Exploring and Evaluating Hallucinations in LLM-Powered Code Generation
2404.00971
0
0
Abstract
The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly advanced many applications on software engineering tasks, particularly in code generation. Despite the promising performance, LLMs are prone to generate hallucinations, which means LLMs might produce outputs that deviate from users' intent, exhibit internal inconsistencies, or misalign with the factual knowledge, making the deployment of LLMs potentially risky in a wide range of applications. Existing work mainly focuses on investing the hallucination in the domain of natural language generation (NLG), leaving a gap in understanding the types and extent of hallucinations in the context of code generation. To bridge the gap, we conducted a thematic analysis of the LLM-generated code to summarize and categorize the hallucinations present in it. Our study established a comprehensive taxonomy of hallucinations in LLM-generated code, encompassing 5 primary categories of hallucinations depending on the conflicting objectives and varying degrees of deviation observed in code generation. Furthermore, we systematically analyzed the distribution of hallucinations, exploring variations among different LLMs and their correlation with code correctness. Based on the results, we proposed HalluCode, a benchmark for evaluating the performance of code LLMs in recognizing hallucinations. Hallucination recognition and mitigation experiments with HalluCode and HumanEval show existing LLMs face great challenges in recognizing hallucinations, particularly in identifying their types, and are hardly able to mitigate hallucinations. We believe our findings will shed light on future research about hallucination evaluation, detection, and mitigation, ultimately paving the way for building more effective and reliable code LLMs in the future.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the phenomenon of "hallucination" in large language models (LLMs) used for code generation.
- Hallucination refers to the generation of content that appears plausible but is factually incorrect or nonsensical.
- The researchers investigate the prevalence and characteristics of hallucinations in LLM-powered code generation, and propose methods to detect and mitigate them.
Plain English Explanation
The paper is about a problem that can occur when using large language models (LLMs) to generate code. LLMs are AI systems that are trained on massive amounts of text data, which allows them to generate human-like text on a wide range of topics. However, sometimes these models can produce text that seems coherent and believable, but is actually incorrect or doesn't make sense. This is called "hallucination."
The researchers in this paper wanted to better understand hallucination in the context of code generation. They looked at how often LLMs produce hallucinated code, what kinds of hallucinations are common, and how we can detect and prevent these issues. The goal is to make LLM-powered code generation more reliable and trustworthy.
Technical Explanation
The paper first provides background on hallucination in LLMs and related work on hallucination in other AI systems. It then describes the researchers' approach to studying hallucination in LLM-powered code generation.
The key elements of the study include:
- Dataset: The researchers compiled a dataset of programming tasks and prompts to evaluate LLM code generation.
- LLM Models: They tested several popular LLM models, including GPT-3 and CodeT5, on the dataset.
- Hallucination Detection: The team developed techniques to automatically detect hallucinated code, including static code analysis and semantic consistency checks.
- Mitigation Strategies: They explored methods to reduce hallucination, such as prompting strategies and fine-tuning the LLMs on high-quality code.
The paper presents detailed results and insights from the experiments, including the prevalence of different types of hallucinations and the effectiveness of the detection and mitigation approaches.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their work. For example, the dataset and LLM models used may not be fully representative of real-world code generation tasks and systems. Additionally, the hallucination detection methods, while promising, may still have room for improvement in terms of accuracy and robustness.
One potential area for further research would be to investigate [how hallucination in LLM-powered code generation compares to hallucination in other LLM applications, such as text summarization or multimodal generation. This could help provide a more comprehensive understanding of the hallucination problem and potential solutions.
Additionally, the researchers could explore the ethical implications of hallucination in code generation, particularly in safety-critical domains or applications that could have significant real-world consequences.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution to understanding and addressing the issue of hallucination in LLM-powered code generation. By quantifying the prevalence of hallucinations, identifying common types, and proposing detection and mitigation strategies, the researchers have taken a crucial step towards making LLM-based code generation more reliable and trustworthy. As LLMs continue to be integrated into a wide range of applications, addressing hallucination will be a critical challenge for the AI research community.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌿
CodeHalu: Code Hallucinations in LLMs Driven by Execution-based Verification
Yuchen Tian, Weixiang Yan, Qian Yang, Qian Chen, Wen Wang, Ziyang Luo, Lei Ma
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant progress in code generation, providing developers with unprecedented automated programming support. However, LLMs often generate code that is syntactically correct and even semantically plausible but may not execute as expected or meet specified requirements. This phenomenon of hallucinations in the code domain has not been systematically explored. To enhance the community's understanding and research on this issue, we introduce the concept of code hallucinations and propose a classification method for code hallucination based on execution verification. We classify code hallucinations into four main types: mapping, naming, resource, and logic hallucinations, with each category further divided into different subcategories to understand and address the unique challenges faced by LLMs in code generation with finer granularity. Additionally, we develop a dynamic detection algorithm named CodeHalu to quantify code hallucinations and establish the CodeHaluEval benchmark, which includes 8,883 samples from 699 tasks to systematically and quantitatively evaluate code hallucinations. By evaluating 17 popular LLMs on this benchmark, we reveal significant differences in their accuracy and reliability in code generation and provide detailed insights for further improving the code generation capabilities of LLMs. The CodeHalu benchmark and code are publicly available at https://github.com/yuchen814/CodeHalu.
6/28/2024
We Have a Package for You! A Comprehensive Analysis of Package Hallucinations by Code Generating LLMs
Joseph Spracklen, Raveen Wijewickrama, A H M Nazmus Sakib, Anindya Maiti, Murtuza Jadliwala
0
0
The reliance of popular programming languages such as Python and JavaScript on centralized package repositories and open-source software, combined with the emergence of code-generating Large Language Models (LLMs), has created a new type of threat to the software supply chain: package hallucinations. These hallucinations, which arise from fact-conflicting errors when generating code using LLMs, represent a novel form of package confusion attack that poses a critical threat to the integrity of the software supply chain. This paper conducts a rigorous and comprehensive evaluation of package hallucinations across different programming languages, settings, and parameters, exploring how different configurations of LLMs affect the likelihood of generating erroneous package recommendations and identifying the root causes of this phenomena. Using 16 different popular code generation models, across two programming languages and two unique prompt datasets, we collect 576,000 code samples which we analyze for package hallucinations. Our findings reveal that 19.7% of generated packages across all the tested LLMs are hallucinated, including a staggering 205,474 unique examples of hallucinated package names, further underscoring the severity and pervasiveness of this threat. We also implemented and evaluated mitigation strategies based on Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), self-detected feedback, and supervised fine-tuning. These techniques demonstrably reduced package hallucinations, with hallucination rates for one model dropping below 3%. While the mitigation efforts were effective in reducing hallucination rates, our study reveals that package hallucinations are a systemic and persistent phenomenon that pose a significant challenge for code generating LLMs.
6/18/2024
💬
Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey
Zechen Bai, Pichao Wang, Tianjun Xiao, Tong He, Zongbo Han, Zheng Zhang, Mike Zheng Shou
0
0
This survey presents a comprehensive analysis of the phenomenon of hallucination in multimodal large language models (MLLMs), also known as Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), which have demonstrated significant advancements and remarkable abilities in multimodal tasks. Despite these promising developments, MLLMs often generate outputs that are inconsistent with the visual content, a challenge known as hallucination, which poses substantial obstacles to their practical deployment and raises concerns regarding their reliability in real-world applications. This problem has attracted increasing attention, prompting efforts to detect and mitigate such inaccuracies. We review recent advances in identifying, evaluating, and mitigating these hallucinations, offering a detailed overview of the underlying causes, evaluation benchmarks, metrics, and strategies developed to address this issue. Additionally, we analyze the current challenges and limitations, formulating open questions that delineate potential pathways for future research. By drawing the granular classification and landscapes of hallucination causes, evaluation benchmarks, and mitigation methods, this survey aims to deepen the understanding of hallucinations in MLLMs and inspire further advancements in the field. Through our thorough and in-depth review, we contribute to the ongoing dialogue on enhancing the robustness and reliability of MLLMs, providing valuable insights and resources for researchers and practitioners alike. Resources are available at: https://github.com/showlab/Awesome-MLLM-Hallucination.
4/30/2024
A Survey on Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models
Hanchao Liu, Wenyuan Xue, Yifei Chen, Dapeng Chen, Xiutian Zhao, Ke Wang, Liping Hou, Rongjun Li, Wei Peng
0
0
Recent development of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) has attracted growing attention within the AI landscape for its practical implementation potential. However, ``hallucination'', or more specifically, the misalignment between factual visual content and corresponding textual generation, poses a significant challenge of utilizing LVLMs. In this comprehensive survey, we dissect LVLM-related hallucinations in an attempt to establish an overview and facilitate future mitigation. Our scrutiny starts with a clarification of the concept of hallucinations in LVLMs, presenting a variety of hallucination symptoms and highlighting the unique challenges inherent in LVLM hallucinations. Subsequently, we outline the benchmarks and methodologies tailored specifically for evaluating hallucinations unique to LVLMs. Additionally, we delve into an investigation of the root causes of these hallucinations, encompassing insights from the training data and model components. We also critically review existing methods for mitigating hallucinations. The open questions and future directions pertaining to hallucinations within LVLMs are discussed to conclude this survey.
5/7/2024