CogErgLLM: Exploring Large Language Model Systems Design Perspective Using Cognitive Ergonomics
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Explores the design of large language model (LLM) systems from a cognitive ergonomics perspective
- Examines the user experience and interactions with LLMs to improve their effectiveness and accessibility
- Proposes a framework for designing LLM systems that consider the cognitive needs and limitations of users
Plain English Explanation
This paper looks at how large language model (LLM) systems, like chatbots and AI assistants, can be designed to be more user-friendly and effective. The authors use the field of cognitive ergonomics to understand how people interact with and perceive these AI systems.
The goal is to create LLM systems that are better aligned with how humans think, learn, and process information. This could involve improving the way information is presented, making the interactions more intuitive, and accounting for cognitive biases and limitations.
By taking a human-centered design approach, the authors believe LLMs can be made more accessible and useful for a wider range of users. This could be particularly important as LLMs become more integrated into research workflows and as ethical considerations around LLM usage become more prominent.
Overall, the paper aims to provide a framework for designing LLM systems that better account for human factors and improve the user experience.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the concept of "CogErgLLM," which stands for Cognitive Ergonomics of Large Language Models. This framework examines LLM systems from the perspective of cognitive ergonomics, a field that studies the interaction between humans and technological systems.
The authors first establish the conceptual foundations, drawing on theories of cognitive load, mental models, and user experience design. They then propose a set of design principles and guidelines for creating LLM systems that better align with human cognitive capabilities and limitations.
Key elements of the CogErgLLM framework include:
- Modeling the user's mental representation of the LLM system and how it evolves over time
- Analyzing the cognitive demands placed on users during LLM interactions
- Designing LLM interfaces and interactions to minimize cognitive overhead and support natural information processing
- Incorporating user feedback and contextual factors to continuously improve the user experience
The authors also discuss potential applications of the CogErgLLM framework, such as enhancing the usability of LLM-powered research assistants and improving the transparency and trustworthiness of LLM systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful and well-grounded approach to designing LLM systems with the user in mind. The authors acknowledge the limitations of their framework, noting that it may not capture all the nuances of human-LLM interaction and that further empirical validation is needed.
One potential area for further research is the impact of individual differences, such as cognitive styles and prior experience, on the effectiveness of the CogErgLLM approach. Additionally, the framework could be expanded to consider the social and ethical implications of LLM design, such as how these systems can be made more inclusive and equitable.
Overall, the CogErgLLM framework offers a valuable perspective for improving the usability and accessibility of LLM systems and can serve as a foundation for future research in this area.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to designing large language model (LLM) systems from a cognitive ergonomics perspective. By considering the cognitive needs and limitations of users, the CogErgLLM framework aims to create LLM interactions that are more intuitive, effective, and accessible.
The proposed design principles and guidelines have the potential to enhance the user experience of LLM-powered applications, particularly as these systems become more integrated into research workflows and everyday life. While further validation and refinement are needed, this work represents an important step towards designing AI systems that better serve human needs.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
CogErgLLM: Exploring Large Language Model Systems Design Perspective Using Cognitive Ergonomics
Azmine Toushik Wasi
Integrating cognitive ergonomics with LLMs is essential for enhancing safety, reliability, and user satisfaction in human-AI interactions. Current LLM design often lacks this integration, leading to systems that may not fully align with human cognitive capabilities and limitations. Insufficient focus on incorporating cognitive science methods exacerbates biases in LLM outputs, while inconsistent application of user-centered design principles results in sub-optimal user experiences. To address these challenges, our position paper explores the critical integration of cognitive ergonomics principles into LLM design, aiming to provide a comprehensive framework and practical guidelines for ethical LLM development. Through our contributions, we seek to advance understanding and practice in integrating cognitive ergonomics into LLM systems, fostering safer, more reliable, and ethically sound human-AI interactions.
Read more8/20/2024
0
Large Language Models and Cognitive Science: A Comprehensive Review of Similarities, Differences, and Challenges
Qian Niu, Junyu Liu, Ziqian Bi, Pohsun Feng, Benji Peng, Keyu Chen, Ming Li
This comprehensive review explores the intersection of Large Language Models (LLMs) and cognitive science, examining similarities and differences between LLMs and human cognitive processes. We analyze methods for evaluating LLMs cognitive abilities and discuss their potential as cognitive models. The review covers applications of LLMs in various cognitive fields, highlighting insights gained for cognitive science research. We assess cognitive biases and limitations of LLMs, along with proposed methods for improving their performance. The integration of LLMs with cognitive architectures is examined, revealing promising avenues for enhancing artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities. Key challenges and future research directions are identified, emphasizing the need for continued refinement of LLMs to better align with human cognition. This review provides a balanced perspective on the current state and future potential of LLMs in advancing our understanding of both artificial and human intelligence.
Read more9/14/2024
💬
0
Cognitive LLMs: Towards Integrating Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models for Manufacturing Decision-making
Siyu Wu, Alessandro Oltramari, Jonathan Francis, C. Lee Giles, Frank E. Ritter
Resolving the dichotomy between the human-like yet constrained reasoning processes of Cognitive Architectures and the broad but often noisy inference behavior of Large Language Models (LLMs) remains a challenging but exciting pursuit, for enabling reliable machine reasoning capabilities in production systems. Because Cognitive Architectures are famously developed for the purpose of modeling the internal mechanisms of human cognitive decision-making at a computational level, new investigations consider the goal of informing LLMs with the knowledge necessary for replicating such processes, e.g., guided perception, memory, goal-setting, and action. Previous approaches that use LLMs for grounded decision-making struggle with complex reasoning tasks that require slower, deliberate cognition over fast and intuitive inference -- reporting issues related to the lack of sufficient grounding, as in hallucination. To resolve these challenges, we introduce LLM-ACTR, a novel neuro-symbolic architecture that provides human-aligned and versatile decision-making by integrating the ACT-R Cognitive Architecture with LLMs. Our framework extracts and embeds knowledge of ACT-R's internal decision-making process as latent neural representations, injects this information into trainable LLM adapter layers, and fine-tunes the LLMs for downstream prediction. Our experiments on novel Design for Manufacturing tasks show both improved task performance as well as improved grounded decision-making capability of our approach, compared to LLM-only baselines that leverage chain-of-thought reasoning strategies.
Read more8/20/2024
📈
0
A New Era in Human Factors Engineering: A Survey of the Applications and Prospects of Large Multimodal Models
Li Fan, Lee Ching-Hung, Han Su, Feng Shanshan, Jiang Zhuoxuan, Sun Zhu
In recent years, the potential applications of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) in fields such as healthcare, social psychology, and industrial design have attracted wide research attention, providing new directions for human factors research. For instance, LMM-based smart systems have become novel research subjects of human factors studies, and LMM introduces new research paradigms and methodologies to this field. Therefore, this paper aims to explore the applications, challenges, and future prospects of LMM in the domain of human factors and ergonomics through an expert-LMM collaborated literature review. Specifically, a novel literature review method is proposed, and research studies of LMM-based accident analysis, human modelling and intervention design are introduced. Subsequently, the paper discusses future trends of the research paradigm and challenges of human factors and ergonomics studies in the era of LMMs. It is expected that this study can provide a valuable perspective and serve as a reference for integrating human factors with artificial intelligence.
Read more5/24/2024