Cognitive LLMs: Towards Integrating Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models for Manufacturing Decision-making

Read original: arXiv:2408.09176 - Published 8/20/2024 by Siyu Wu, Alessandro Oltramari, Jonathan Francis, C. Lee Giles, Frank E. Ritter

💬

Overview

This paper explores a novel approach to integrating the strengths of Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models (LLMs) for reliable machine reasoning.
Cognitive Architectures are known for modeling human-like decision-making processes, while LLMs excel at broad, but sometimes noisy, inference.
The goal is to leverage the internal decision-making knowledge of Cognitive Architectures to inform and improve the reasoning capabilities of LLMs.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new system called LLM-ACTR that combines the benefits of Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models. Cognitive Architectures are computer models that try to mimic how the human mind works, including things like perception, memory, and decision-making. Large Language Models are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text, but they sometimes struggle with complex reasoning tasks that require careful, deliberate thinking.

The key idea behind LLM-ACTR is to take the internal decision-making knowledge from a Cognitive Architecture called ACT-R and use it to train and improve the reasoning capabilities of an LLM. The researchers extract this knowledge as latent neural representations and inject it into the LLM, allowing it to make more grounded and reliable decisions, especially on tasks that require slower, more deliberate reasoning.

Technical Explanation

The researchers introduce a neuro-symbolic architecture called LLM-ACTR that integrates the ACT-R Cognitive Architecture with LLMs. ACT-R is a well-known model of human cognition that provides a detailed computational account of internal decision-making processes.

The key components of LLM-ACTR are:

Knowledge Extraction: The researchers extract and embed the knowledge of ACT-R's internal decision-making process as latent neural representations.
Knowledge Injection: These latent representations are then injected into trainable LLM adapter layers, effectively informing the LLM with ACT-R's decision-making knowledge.
Fine-tuning: The LLM is then fine-tuned on downstream prediction tasks, leveraging the integrated ACT-R knowledge for improved reasoning and decision-making.

The researchers evaluate LLM-ACTR on novel Design for Manufacturing tasks, demonstrating improved performance and more grounded decision-making compared to LLM-only baselines that use chain-of-thought reasoning.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to combining the strengths of Cognitive Architectures and LLMs, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:

The experiments are conducted on a specific set of Design for Manufacturing tasks, and the researchers suggest exploring the approach on a wider range of applications and domains.
The integration of ACT-R knowledge is currently limited to the adapter layers, and the researchers suggest exploring more seamless integration into the core LLM architecture.
The paper does not address the potential challenges of scaling the neuro-symbolic approach to larger and more complex LLMs, which may require new techniques for efficient knowledge extraction and injection.

Overall, the paper makes a compelling case for the potential of leveraging Cognitive Architectures to enhance the reasoning capabilities of LLMs, but further research is needed to fully realize this potential and address the identified limitations.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach, called LLM-ACTR, that integrates the strengths of Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models to enable more reliable and grounded machine reasoning. By extracting and injecting the internal decision-making knowledge of the ACT-R Cognitive Architecture into LLMs, the researchers demonstrate improved performance and decision-making on complex reasoning tasks.

The work highlights the potential of combining human-like cognitive models with the broad language understanding of LLMs, opening up new avenues for developing robust and trustworthy AI systems that can tackle a wide range of real-world problems. As the field of AI continues to evolve, the integration of Cognitive Architectures and LLMs remains an exciting and promising area of research.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Cognitive LLMs: Towards Integrating Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models for Manufacturing Decision-making

Siyu Wu, Alessandro Oltramari, Jonathan Francis, C. Lee Giles, Frank E. Ritter

Resolving the dichotomy between the human-like yet constrained reasoning processes of Cognitive Architectures and the broad but often noisy inference behavior of Large Language Models (LLMs) remains a challenging but exciting pursuit, for enabling reliable machine reasoning capabilities in production systems. Because Cognitive Architectures are famously developed for the purpose of modeling the internal mechanisms of human cognitive decision-making at a computational level, new investigations consider the goal of informing LLMs with the knowledge necessary for replicating such processes, e.g., guided perception, memory, goal-setting, and action. Previous approaches that use LLMs for grounded decision-making struggle with complex reasoning tasks that require slower, deliberate cognition over fast and intuitive inference -- reporting issues related to the lack of sufficient grounding, as in hallucination. To resolve these challenges, we introduce LLM-ACTR, a novel neuro-symbolic architecture that provides human-aligned and versatile decision-making by integrating the ACT-R Cognitive Architecture with LLMs. Our framework extracts and embeds knowledge of ACT-R's internal decision-making process as latent neural representations, injects this information into trainable LLM adapter layers, and fine-tunes the LLMs for downstream prediction. Our experiments on novel Design for Manufacturing tasks show both improved task performance as well as improved grounded decision-making capability of our approach, compared to LLM-only baselines that leverage chain-of-thought reasoning strategies.

8/20/2024

Predicting and Understanding Human Action Decisions: Insights from Large Language Models and Cognitive Instance-Based Learning

Thuy Ngoc Nguyen, Kasturi Jamale, Cleotilde Gonzalez

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their capabilities across various tasks, from language translation to complex reasoning. Understanding and predicting human behavior and biases are crucial for artificial intelligence (AI) assisted systems to provide useful assistance, yet it remains an open question whether these models can achieve this. This paper addresses this gap by leveraging the reasoning and generative capabilities of the LLMs to predict human behavior in two sequential decision-making tasks. These tasks involve balancing between exploitative and exploratory actions and handling delayed feedback, both essential for simulating real-life decision processes. We compare the performance of LLMs with a cognitive instance-based learning (IBL) model, which imitates human experiential decision-making. Our findings indicate that LLMs excel at rapidly incorporating feedback to enhance prediction accuracy. In contrast, the cognitive IBL model better accounts for human exploratory behaviors and effectively captures loss aversion bias, i.e., the tendency to choose a sub-optimal goal with fewer step-cost penalties rather than exploring to find the optimal choice, even with limited experience. The results highlight the benefits of integrating LLMs with cognitive architectures, suggesting that this synergy could enhance the modeling and understanding of complex human decision-making patterns.

7/15/2024

Large Language Models and Cognitive Science: A Comprehensive Review of Similarities, Differences, and Challenges

Qian Niu, Junyu Liu, Ziqian Bi, Pohsun Feng, Benji Peng, Keyu Chen, Ming Li

This comprehensive review explores the intersection of Large Language Models (LLMs) and cognitive science, examining similarities and differences between LLMs and human cognitive processes. We analyze methods for evaluating LLMs cognitive abilities and discuss their potential as cognitive models. The review covers applications of LLMs in various cognitive fields, highlighting insights gained for cognitive science research. We assess cognitive biases and limitations of LLMs, along with proposed methods for improving their performance. The integration of LLMs with cognitive architectures is examined, revealing promising avenues for enhancing artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities. Key challenges and future research directions are identified, emphasizing the need for continued refinement of LLMs to better align with human cognition. This review provides a balanced perspective on the current state and future potential of LLMs in advancing our understanding of both artificial and human intelligence.

9/14/2024

Building Decision Making Models Through Language Model Regime

Yu Zhang, Haoxiang Liu, Feijun Jiang, Weihua Luo, Kaifu Zhang

We propose a novel approach for decision making problems leveraging the generalization capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Traditional methods such as expert systems, planning algorithms, and reinforcement learning often exhibit limited generalization, typically requiring the training of new models for each unique task. In contrast, LLMs demonstrate remarkable success in generalizing across varied language tasks, inspiring a new strategy for training decision making models. Our approach, referred to as Learning then Using (LTU), entails a two-stage process. Initially, the textit{learning} phase develops a robust foundational decision making model by integrating diverse knowledge from various domains and decision making contexts. The subsequent textit{using} phase refines this foundation model for specific decision making scenarios. Distinct from other studies that employ LLMs for decision making through supervised learning, our LTU method embraces a versatile training methodology that combines broad pre-training with targeted fine-tuning. Experiments in e-commerce domains such as advertising and search optimization have shown that LTU approach outperforms traditional supervised learning regimes in decision making capabilities and generalization. The LTU approach is the first practical training architecture for both single-step and multi-step decision making tasks combined with LLMs, which can be applied beyond game and robot domains. It provides a robust and adaptable framework for decision making, enhances the effectiveness and flexibility of various systems in tackling various challenges.

8/13/2024