COKE: A Cognitive Knowledge Graph for Machine Theory of Mind

Read original: arXiv:2305.05390 - Published 5/21/2024 by Jincenzi Wu, Zhuang Chen, Jiawen Deng, Sahand Sabour, Helen Meng, Minlie Huang
Total Score

0

🛸

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Humans have the ability to understand and infer the desires, beliefs, and intentions of others, known as theory of mind (ToM).
  • ToM is crucial for social intelligence, but current AI and NLP systems lack this ability as they cannot access the human mental state and cognitive processes behind the training data.
  • The paper proposes COKE, the first cognitive knowledge graph for machine theory of mind, to empower AI systems with ToM abilities and narrow the gap between them and humans.

Plain English Explanation

Humans have a remarkable ability to understand and predict the thoughts and feelings of other people. This is called theory of mind (ToM). It's a crucial skill for navigating the social world and interacting with others. However, current AI and natural language processing (NLP) systems don't have this same capacity. They can only work with the information they're trained on, without access to the underlying human thought processes.

To help bridge this gap, the researchers developed COKE, a comprehensive database of over 45,000 cognitive chains. These chains describe how humans might think and feel in specific social situations and how they might respond. By giving AI systems access to this cognitive knowledge, the researchers aim to empower them with ToM abilities, allowing them to better understand and interact with humans.

The researchers also created a powerful language model called COLM, which can use the COKE knowledge to engage in cognitive reasoning and generate more human-like responses. Through extensive testing, they demonstrated that COLM has impressive ToM capabilities, outperforming other models and showing promise for enhancing social applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes COKE, the first cognitive knowledge graph for machine theory of mind (ToM). COKE formalizes ToM as a collection of over 45,000 manually verified "cognitive chains" that characterize human mental activities and subsequent behavioral/affective responses in specific social circumstances.

To build COKE, the researchers leveraged large language models (LLMs) and a novel conceptualization process to generalize the cognitive knowledge. They then developed COLM, a powerful generation model tailored for cognitive reasoning, which can use the COKE knowledge to engage in ToM-based inference and produce more human-like responses.

The researchers conducted both automatic and human evaluations to assess the quality of COKE and the ToM abilities of COLM. The results demonstrated the high-quality of COKE and the superior ToM performance of COLM compared to other models, highlighting its potential to significantly enhance social applications.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to empowering AI systems with theory of mind (ToM) capabilities, a crucial skill for social intelligence. The COKE knowledge graph and the COLM generation model represent significant advancements in this area.

However, the paper does not address potential limitations or caveats of the proposed approach. For instance, it's unclear how the manually curated cognitive chains in COKE can be scaled to cover the full breadth of human social cognition, or how the system would handle the inherent complexity and context-dependence of real-world social interactions.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into potential ethical considerations or challenges associated with delegating ToM reasoning to language models. As these systems become more advanced, it will be crucial to carefully consider issues of bias, privacy, and the responsible development of self-evaluation capabilities in AI.

Overall, the research represents an important step forward in bridging the gap between AI and human social intelligence. However, further investigation into the limitations, ethical implications, and long-term feasibility of this approach will be necessary to fully understand its impact and potential.

Conclusion

The proposed COKE and COLM system represents a significant advancement in empowering AI with theory of mind (ToM) capabilities, which are essential for social intelligence and human-like interaction. By formalizing ToM as a comprehensive knowledge graph and developing a powerful cognitive reasoning model, the researchers have demonstrated the potential to narrow the gap between AI and human social cognition.

While further research is needed to address the limitations and ethical considerations of this approach, the findings presented in this paper have exciting implications for the development of more socially intelligent AI systems that can better understand and interact with humans in a wide range of applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛸

Total Score

0

COKE: A Cognitive Knowledge Graph for Machine Theory of Mind

Jincenzi Wu, Zhuang Chen, Jiawen Deng, Sahand Sabour, Helen Meng, Minlie Huang

Theory of mind (ToM) refers to humans' ability to understand and infer the desires, beliefs, and intentions of others. The acquisition of ToM plays a key role in humans' social cognition and interpersonal relations. Though indispensable for social intelligence, ToM is still lacking for modern AI and NLP systems since they cannot access the human mental state and cognitive process beneath the training corpus. To empower AI systems with the ToM ability and narrow the gap between them and humans, in this paper, we propose COKE: the first cognitive knowledge graph for machine theory of mind. Specifically, COKE formalizes ToM as a collection of 45k+ manually verified cognitive chains that characterize human mental activities and subsequent behavioral/affective responses when facing specific social circumstances. In addition, we further generalize COKE using LLMs and build a powerful generation model COLM tailored for cognitive reasoning. Experimental results in both automatic and human evaluation demonstrate the high quality of COKE, the superior ToM ability of COLM, and its potential to significantly enhance social applications.

Read more

5/21/2024

📉

Total Score

0

Cognitive Insights and Stable Coalition Matching for Fostering Multi-Agent Cooperation

Jiaqi Shao, Tianjun Yuan, Tao Lin, Xuanyu Cao, Bing Luo

Cognitive abilities, such as Theory of Mind (ToM), play a vital role in facilitating cooperation in human social interactions. However, our study reveals that agents with higher ToM abilities may not necessarily exhibit better cooperative behavior compared to those with lower ToM abilities. To address this challenge, we propose a novel matching coalition mechanism that leverages the strengths of agents with different ToM levels by explicitly considering belief alignment and specialized abilities when forming coalitions. Our proposed matching algorithm seeks to find stable coalitions that maximize the potential for cooperative behavior and ensure long-term viability. By incorporating cognitive insights into the design of multi-agent systems, our work demonstrates the potential of leveraging ToM to create more sophisticated and human-like coordination strategies that foster cooperation and improve overall system performance.

Read more

5/29/2024

Total Score

0

Mutual Theory of Mind for Human-AI Communication

Qiaosi Wang (Georgia Institute of Technology), Ashok K. Goel (Georgia Institute of Technology)

New developments are enabling AI systems to perceive, recognize, and respond with social cues based on inferences made from humans' explicit or implicit behavioral and verbal cues. These AI systems, equipped with an equivalent of human's Theory of Mind (ToM) capability, are currently serving as matchmakers on dating platforms, assisting student learning as teaching assistants, and enhancing productivity as work partners. They mark a new era in human-AI interaction (HAI) that diverges from traditional human-computer interaction (HCI), where computers are commonly seen as tools instead of social actors. Designing and understanding the human perceptions and experiences in this emerging HAI era becomes an urgent and critical issue for AI systems to fulfill human needs and mitigate risks across social contexts. In this paper, we posit the Mutual Theory of Mind (MToM) framework, inspired by our capability of ToM in human-human communications, to guide this new generation of HAI research by highlighting the iterative and mutual shaping nature of human-AI communication. We discuss the motivation of the MToM framework and its three key components that iteratively shape the human-AI communication in three stages. We then describe two empirical studies inspired by the MToM framework to demonstrate the power of MToM in guiding the design and understanding of human-AI communication. Finally, we discuss future research opportunities in human-AI interaction through the lens of MToM.

Read more

5/28/2024

👀

Total Score

0

Limits of Theory of Mind Modelling in Dialogue-Based Collaborative Plan Acquisition

Matteo Bortoletto, Constantin Ruhdorfer, Adnen Abdessaied, Lei Shi, Andreas Bulling

Recent work on dialogue-based collaborative plan acquisition (CPA) has suggested that Theory of Mind (ToM) modelling can improve missing knowledge prediction in settings with asymmetric skill-sets and knowledge. Although ToM was claimed to be important for effective collaboration, its real impact on this novel task remains under-explored. By representing plans as graphs and by exploiting task-specific constraints we show that, as performance on CPA nearly doubles when predicting one's own missing knowledge, the improvements due to ToM modelling diminish. This phenomenon persists even when evaluating existing baseline methods. To better understand the relevance of ToM for CPA, we report a principled performance comparison of models with and without ToM features. Results across different models and ablations consistently suggest that learned ToM features are indeed more likely to reflect latent patterns in the data with no perceivable link to ToM. This finding calls for a deeper understanding of the role of ToM in CPA and beyond, as well as new methods for modelling and evaluating mental states in computational collaborative agents.

Read more

5/30/2024