Acquiring and Modelling Abstract Commonsense Knowledge via Conceptualization

Read original: arXiv:2206.01532 - Published 5/21/2024 by Mutian He, Tianqing Fang, Weiqi Wang, Yangqiu Song
Total Score

0

๐Ÿงช

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper examines the role of conceptualization in commonsense reasoning, a vital component of human intelligence.
  • Current approaches to modeling commonsense knowledge, such as neural language models and commonsense knowledge graphs (CKGs), are limited in their ability to cover the vast diversity of real-world entities and situations.
  • The researchers propose a framework to replicate human conceptual induction, acquiring abstract knowledge about events and higher-level inferences.
  • They apply this framework to the ATOMIC CKG, annotating a dataset on the validity of contextualized conceptualizations and training models to generate and verify abstract knowledge.
  • The resulting pipeline produces a large abstract CKG that can be used to improve commonsense inference and zero-shot commonsense question-answering.

Plain English Explanation

Conceptualization, or the process of viewing things as instances of abstract ideas, is a crucial part of how humans use common sense to reason about the world. Even though recent advancements in AI, like neural language models and commonsense knowledge graphs, have helped capture some commonsense knowledge, they still struggle to cover the incredible diversity of real-world entities and situations.

To address this, the researchers in this paper developed a new framework that tries to mimic how humans acquire abstract knowledge about events and use that to draw higher-level conclusions. They applied this framework to a commonsense knowledge graph called ATOMIC, using a taxonomy called Probase to help identify abstract concepts.

First, they had people annotate a dataset to evaluate how well the conceptualizations in ATOMIC matched the real-world context. Then, they used machine learning models to automatically generate and verify this abstract knowledge. The result is a large, abstract commonsense knowledge graph that can be used to improve AI's ability to reason about new, unseen situations using common sense, like answering commonsense questions that require going beyond the information provided.

Technical Explanation

The researchers start by highlighting the importance of conceptualization - the ability to view entities and situations as instances of abstract concepts - in human commonsense reasoning. However, they note that current approaches to modeling commonsense knowledge, such as neural language models and commonsense knowledge graphs (CKGs), fall short in capturing the vast diversity of real-world entities and situations.

To address this, the researchers propose a framework to replicate human conceptual induction. This involves acquiring abstract knowledge about events and higher-level inferences, and then applying it to the ATOMIC CKG. They use the Probase taxonomy to help identify abstract concepts.

The framework consists of several key components:

  1. Annotation of a dataset to evaluate the validity of contextualized conceptualizations in ATOMIC at both the event and triple levels.
  2. Development of heuristic rules based on linguistic features to generate abstract knowledge.
  3. Training of neural models to both generate and verify the abstract knowledge.

These components are then integrated into a pipeline that induces a large abstract CKG upon ATOMIC. The researchers show that augmenting CKGs with this abstract knowledge can improve performance on tasks like commonsense inference and zero-shot commonsense question-answering.

Critical Analysis

The researchers have made a valuable contribution by highlighting the importance of conceptualization in commonsense reasoning and proposing a framework to address the limitations of current approaches. By acquiring abstract knowledge about events and higher-level inferences, they have expanded the scope of commonsense knowledge that can be captured and utilized by AI systems.

However, the paper does not fully address the challenges of scaling this approach to the vast diversity of real-world entities and situations. The reliance on human annotation and heuristic rules, while effective in this study, may not be feasible for large-scale deployment. Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential biases or blindspots that may arise from the way the abstract knowledge is generated and verified.

Furthermore, the paper does not delve into the explainability and interpretability of the abstract knowledge produced by the framework. Understanding the reasoning behind the generated conceptualizations and inferences would be crucial for building trust and transparency in AI systems that rely on this type of commonsense knowledge.

Future research could focus on developing more scalable and automated approaches to acquiring abstract knowledge, as well as investigating methods to ensure the reliability, fairness, and interpretability of the resulting commonsense knowledge graphs. Exploring the integration of this framework with other commonsense reasoning techniques, such as concept induction using large language models or automated construction of theme-specific knowledge graphs, could also lead to further advancements in this important area of AI research.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel framework for replicating human conceptual induction to address the limitations of current approaches to modeling commonsense knowledge. By acquiring abstract knowledge about events and higher-level inferences, and applying it to a commonsense knowledge graph like ATOMIC, the researchers have demonstrated the potential to improve AI's ability to reason about the real world using common sense.

While the framework has shown promising results, there are still challenges to be addressed, such as scalability, bias, and interpretability. Continued research in this direction, potentially integrating it with other commonsense reasoning techniques, could lead to significant advancements in the field of artificial intelligence and its ability to understand and interact with the world in a more human-like manner.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on ๐• โ†’

Related Papers

๐Ÿงช

Total Score

0

Acquiring and Modelling Abstract Commonsense Knowledge via Conceptualization

Mutian He, Tianqing Fang, Weiqi Wang, Yangqiu Song

Conceptualization, or viewing entities and situations as instances of abstract concepts in mind and making inferences based on that, is a vital component in human intelligence for commonsense reasoning. Despite recent progress in artificial intelligence to acquire and model commonsense attributed to neural language models and commonsense knowledge graphs (CKGs), conceptualization is yet to be introduced thoroughly, making current approaches ineffective to cover knowledge about countless diverse entities and situations in the real world. To address the problem, we thoroughly study the role of conceptualization in commonsense reasoning, and formulate a framework to replicate human conceptual induction by acquiring abstract knowledge about events regarding abstract concepts, as well as higher-level triples or inferences upon them. We then apply the framework to ATOMIC, a large-scale human-annotated CKG, aided by the taxonomy Probase. We annotate a dataset on the validity of contextualized conceptualizations from ATOMIC on both event and triple levels, develop a series of heuristic rules based on linguistic features, and train a set of neural models to generate and verify abstract knowledge. Based on these components, a pipeline to acquire abstract knowledge is built. A large abstract CKG upon ATOMIC is then induced, ready to be instantiated to infer about unseen entities or situations. Finally, we empirically show the benefits of augmenting CKGs with abstract knowledge in downstream tasks like commonsense inference and zero-shot commonsense QA.

Read more

5/21/2024

On the Role of Entity and Event Level Conceptualization in Generalizable Reasoning: A Survey of Tasks, Methods, Applications, and Future Directions
Total Score

0

On the Role of Entity and Event Level Conceptualization in Generalizable Reasoning: A Survey of Tasks, Methods, Applications, and Future Directions

Weiqi Wang, Tianqing Fang, Haochen Shi, Baixuan Xu, Wenxuan Ding, Liyu Zhang, Wei Fan, Jiaxin Bai, Haoran Li, Xin Liu, Yangqiu Song

Entity- and event-level conceptualization, as fundamental elements of human cognition, plays a pivotal role in generalizable reasoning. This process involves abstracting specific instances into higher-level concepts and forming abstract knowledge that can be applied in unfamiliar or novel situations, which can enhance models' inferential capabilities and support the effective transfer of knowledge across various domains. Despite its significance, there is currently a lack of a systematic overview that comprehensively examines existing works in the definition, execution, and application of conceptualization to enhance reasoning tasks. In this paper, we address this gap by presenting the first comprehensive survey of 150+ papers, categorizing various definitions, resources, methods, and downstream applications related to conceptualization into a unified taxonomy, with a focus on the entity and event levels. Furthermore, we shed light on potential future directions in this field and hope to garner more attention from the community.

Read more

6/18/2024

Reasoning about concepts with LLMs: Inconsistencies abound
Total Score

0

Reasoning about concepts with LLMs: Inconsistencies abound

Rosario Uceda-Sosa, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, Maria Chang, Moninder Singh

The ability to summarize and organize knowledge into abstract concepts is key to learning and reasoning. Many industrial applications rely on the consistent and systematic use of concepts, especially when dealing with decision-critical knowledge. However, we demonstrate that, when methodically questioned, large language models (LLMs) often display and demonstrate significant inconsistencies in their knowledge. Computationally, the basic aspects of the conceptualization of a given domain can be represented as Is-A hierarchies in a knowledge graph (KG) or ontology, together with a few properties or axioms that enable straightforward reasoning. We show that even simple ontologies can be used to reveal conceptual inconsistencies across several LLMs. We also propose strategies that domain experts can use to evaluate and improve the coverage of key domain concepts in LLMs of various sizes. In particular, we have been able to significantly enhance the performance of LLMs of various sizes with openly available weights using simple knowledge-graph (KG) based prompting strategies.

Read more

5/31/2024

CANDLE: Iterative Conceptualization and Instantiation Distillation from Large Language Models for Commonsense Reasoning
Total Score

0

CANDLE: Iterative Conceptualization and Instantiation Distillation from Large Language Models for Commonsense Reasoning

Weiqi Wang, Tianqing Fang, Chunyang Li, Haochen Shi, Wenxuan Ding, Baixuan Xu, Zhaowei Wang, Jiaxin Bai, Xin Liu, Jiayang Cheng, Chunkit Chan, Yangqiu Song

The sequential process of conceptualization and instantiation is essential to generalizable commonsense reasoning as it allows the application of existing knowledge to unfamiliar scenarios. However, existing works tend to undervalue the step of instantiation and heavily rely on pre-built concept taxonomies and human annotations to collect both types of knowledge, resulting in a lack of instantiated knowledge to complete reasoning, high cost, and limited scalability. To tackle these challenges, we introduce CANDLE, a distillation framework that iteratively performs contextualized conceptualization and instantiation over commonsense knowledge bases by instructing large language models to generate both types of knowledge with critic filtering. By applying CANDLE to ATOMIC, we construct a comprehensive knowledge base comprising six million conceptualizations and instantiated commonsense knowledge triples. Both types of knowledge are firmly rooted in the original ATOMIC dataset, and intrinsic evaluations demonstrate their exceptional quality and diversity. Empirical results indicate that distilling CANDLE on student models provides benefits across four downstream tasks. Our code, data, and models are publicly available at https://github.com/HKUST-KnowComp/CANDLE.

Read more

5/24/2024