Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores combining AI control systems and human decision support to improve robustness and criticality in autonomous systems.
- The authors propose a framework that leverages the strengths of both AI and human decision-making to enhance the safety and reliability of autonomous systems.
- The research investigates how AI control systems and human decision support can be integrated to achieve greater robustness and better handle critical situations.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a way to combine the capabilities of AI control systems and human decision-making to create more reliable and trustworthy autonomous systems. The researchers suggest that by integrating these two approaches, they can take advantage of the strengths of both AI and human intelligence to improve the overall performance and safety of autonomous systems.
The key idea is that AI control systems can handle routine tasks and decision-making very efficiently, but they may struggle with rare or highly critical situations. In contrast, humans can often better recognize and respond to these types of complex or unexpected scenarios. By having the AI and human decision-making work together, the researchers believe they can create a more robust and reliable autonomous system that can handle a wider range of situations.
The explainable AI and human-AI interaction aspects of this approach are particularly important, as they aim to ensure that the human operator can understand and trust the decisions made by the AI system. This could lead to better task performance and more effective human-AI collaboration.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a framework for combining AI control systems and human decision support to achieve greater robustness and criticality in autonomous systems. The key elements of this approach include:
-
AI Control System: The AI control system is responsible for handling routine tasks and decision-making in the autonomous system. It is designed to be highly efficient and reliable in normal operating conditions.
-
Human Decision Support: The human decision support component is designed to monitor the AI control system and intervene when necessary, particularly in rare or critical situations that the AI may struggle with. The human operator can override the AI's decisions or provide additional guidance.
-
Robustness and Criticality: The integration of the AI control system and human decision support aims to create a more robust and reliable autonomous system that can handle a wider range of scenarios, including those that are highly critical or unexpected. The explainable nature of the system is crucial for ensuring that the human operator can understand and trust the decisions made by the AI.
The authors describe the design and implementation of this framework, as well as the results of experiments and simulations that demonstrate its effectiveness in improving the overall performance and safety of autonomous systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach for combining AI control systems and human decision support to enhance the robustness and criticality of autonomous systems. However, there are several potential limitations and areas for further research that could be explored:
-
Practical Challenges: Integrating AI and human decision-making in a seamless and effective way may prove challenging in real-world deployments. Ensuring smooth communication, efficient coordination, and appropriate task allocation between the AI and human operator will be crucial but may be difficult to achieve.
-
Ethical Considerations: The paper does not delve deeply into the ethical implications of this approach, such as the responsibility and liability concerns when AI and human decision-making are combined. These issues will need to be carefully addressed to ensure the ethical and responsible development of such systems.
-
Scalability and Generalizability: The paper focuses on a specific autonomous system application, and it is unclear whether the proposed framework can be easily scaled or adapted to other domains. Further research may be needed to explore the generalizability of this approach.
-
Human Factors: The paper does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the human factors involved in this human-AI collaboration, such as the cognitive load on the human operator, the training and skill requirements, and the potential for human bias or error to be introduced.
Overall, the paper presents an interesting and potentially valuable approach to enhancing the robustness and criticality of autonomous systems, but additional research and consideration of the practical, ethical, and human factors involved will be crucial for realizing the full potential of this framework.
Conclusion
This paper explores a novel approach to combining AI control systems and human decision support to improve the robustness and criticality of autonomous systems. The key idea is to leverage the strengths of both AI and human intelligence to create a more reliable and trustworthy autonomous system that can handle a wider range of scenarios, including rare or critical situations.
The proposed framework integrates the AI control system, which is designed to handle routine tasks efficiently, with a human decision support component that can intervene and provide additional guidance when necessary. This approach aims to ensure that the autonomous system can maintain a high level of performance and safety, even in complex or unexpected situations.
The research presented in this paper has the potential to contribute to the development of more explainable, trustworthy, and collaborative autonomous systems that can work seamlessly with human operators. However, further research is needed to address the practical, ethical, and human factors challenges that may arise in the implementation of this framework.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality
Walt Woods, Alexander Grushin, Simon Khan, Alvaro Velasquez
AI-enabled capabilities are reaching the requisite level of maturity to be deployed in the real world, yet do not always make correct or safe decisions. One way of addressing these concerns is to leverage AI control systems alongside and in support of human decisions, relying on the AI control system in safe situations while calling on a human co-decider for critical situations. We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks, including MuZero. Multiple improvements to the base agent architecture are proposed. We demonstrate how this technology has two applications: for intelligent decision tools and to enhance training / learning frameworks. In a decision support context, adversarial explanations help a user make the correct decision by highlighting those contextual factors that would need to change for a different AI-recommended decision. As another benefit of adversarial explanations, we show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering. Additionally, we supplement AE by introducing strategically similar autoencoders (SSAs) to help users identify and understand all salient factors being considered by the AI system. In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction. Finally, to identify when AI decisions would most benefit from human oversight, we tie this combined system to our prior art on statistically verified analyses of the criticality of decisions at any point in time.
Read more7/4/2024
🤖
0
Explainable AI for Safe and Trustworthy Autonomous Driving: A Systematic Review
Anton Kuznietsov, Balint Gyevnar, Cheng Wang, Steven Peters, Stefano V. Albrecht
Artificial Intelligence (AI) shows promising applications for the perception and planning tasks in autonomous driving (AD) due to its superior performance compared to conventional methods. However, inscrutable AI systems exacerbate the existing challenge of safety assurance of AD. One way to mitigate this challenge is to utilize explainable AI (XAI) techniques. To this end, we present the first comprehensive systematic literature review of explainable methods for safe and trustworthy AD. We begin by analyzing the requirements for AI in the context of AD, focusing on three key aspects: data, model, and agency. We find that XAI is fundamental to meeting these requirements. Based on this, we explain the sources of explanations in AI and describe a taxonomy of XAI. We then identify five key contributions of XAI for safe and trustworthy AI in AD, which are interpretable design, interpretable surrogate models, interpretable monitoring, auxiliary explanations, and interpretable validation. Finally, we propose a modular framework called SafeX to integrate these contributions, enabling explanation delivery to users while simultaneously ensuring the safety of AI models.
Read more7/4/2024
0
Explainable AI improves task performance in human-AI collaboration
Julian Senoner, Simon Schallmoser, Bernhard Kratzwald, Stefan Feuerriegel, Torbj{o}rn Netland
Artificial intelligence (AI) provides considerable opportunities to assist human work. However, one crucial challenge of human-AI collaboration is that many AI algorithms operate in a black-box manner where the way how the AI makes predictions remains opaque. This makes it difficult for humans to validate a prediction made by AI against their own domain knowledge. For this reason, we hypothesize that augmenting humans with explainable AI as a decision aid improves task performance in human-AI collaboration. To test this hypothesis, we analyze the effect of augmenting domain experts with explainable AI in the form of visual heatmaps. We then compare participants that were either supported by (a) black-box AI or (b) explainable AI, where the latter supports them to follow AI predictions when the AI is accurate or overrule the AI when the AI predictions are wrong. We conducted two preregistered experiments with representative, real-world visual inspection tasks from manufacturing and medicine. The first experiment was conducted with factory workers from an electronics factory, who performed $N=9,600$ assessments of whether electronic products have defects. The second experiment was conducted with radiologists, who performed $N=5,650$ assessments of chest X-ray images to identify lung lesions. The results of our experiments with domain experts performing real-world tasks show that task performance improves when participants are supported by explainable AI instead of black-box AI. For example, in the manufacturing setting, we find that augmenting participants with explainable AI (as opposed to black-box AI) leads to a five-fold decrease in the median error rate of human decisions, which gives a significant improvement in task performance.
Read more6/13/2024
0
Explainable Human-AI Interaction: A Planning Perspective
Sarath Sreedharan, Anagha Kulkarni, Subbarao Kambhampati
From its inception, AI has had a rather ambivalent relationship with humans -- swinging between their augmentation and replacement. Now, as AI technologies enter our everyday lives at an ever increasing pace, there is a greater need for AI systems to work synergistically with humans. One critical requirement for such synergistic human-AI interaction is that the AI systems be explainable to the humans in the loop. To do this effectively, AI agents need to go beyond planning with their own models of the world, and take into account the mental model of the human in the loop. Drawing from several years of research in our lab, we will discuss how the AI agent can use these mental models to either conform to human expectations, or change those expectations through explanatory communication. While the main focus of the book is on cooperative scenarios, we will point out how the same mental models can be used for obfuscation and deception. Although the book is primarily driven by our own research in these areas, in every chapter, we will provide ample connections to relevant research from other groups.
Read more5/28/2024