Compact Optimality Verification for Optimization Proxies
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Proposes a compact optimization verification method for large-scale optimization proxies
- Aims to efficiently verify the optimality of solutions obtained using optimization proxies
- Introduces a bilevel optimization approach to find a compact certificate of optimality
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new method for verifying the optimality of solutions found using optimization proxies. Optimization proxies are simplified models that are used to quickly find good solutions to complex optimization problems, but the solutions may not be truly optimal.
The proposed approach uses a bilevel optimization technique to find a compact "certificate" that proves the optimality of the solution obtained from the proxy. This certificate is much smaller and more efficient to check than directly verifying the full optimization problem.
The key insight is to formulate the problem of finding this compact certificate as another optimization problem, where the goal is to minimize the size of the certificate while ensuring it still proves optimality. This allows the method to scale to large-scale optimization problems where directly verifying optimality would be computationally prohibitive.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel bilevel optimization approach to efficiently verify the optimality of solutions obtained using optimization proxies. The outer optimization problem seeks to find the smallest possible certificate of optimality, while the inner problem ensures that the certificate is valid and proves the solution is truly optimal.
The certificate consists of a small set of linear constraints that, when satisfied, guarantee the solution is optimal for the original optimization problem. By formulating the problem of finding this compact certificate as another optimization problem, the method can scale to large-scale optimization problems where directly verifying optimality would be computationally intractable.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on a variety of benchmark optimization problems, including subset-based instance optimality for private estimation and distributed online constrained convex optimization. They show that their method can efficiently verify the optimality of solutions obtained using optimization proxies, even for large-scale problems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach for verifying the optimality of solutions obtained using optimization proxies. The bilevel optimization formulation is a clever way to balance the competing objectives of minimizing the certificate size and ensuring its validity.
One potential limitation of the method is that it assumes the optimization proxy is differentiable, which may not always be the case in practice. Additionally, the authors note that the approach may not be suitable for highly non-convex optimization problems, where finding a compact certificate of optimality may be challenging.
Further research could explore extensions to handle non-differentiable proxies or more general optimization problems, as well as investigate the theoretical limits of the method's performance. Additionally, it would be interesting to see how this approach compares to other verification techniques in terms of computational efficiency and scalability.
Conclusion
The proposed compact optimization verification method provides a novel solution to the challenge of efficiently verifying the optimality of solutions obtained using optimization proxies. By formulating the problem of finding a compact certificate of optimality as a bilevel optimization problem, the method can scale to large-scale optimization problems where direct verification would be computationally prohibitive.
The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach on a range of benchmark optimization problems, suggesting that it could be a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners working with optimization proxies in various domains, such as machine learning, engineering, and operations research.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Compact Optimality Verification for Optimization Proxies
Wenbo Chen, Haoruo Zhao, Mathieu Tanneau, Pascal Van Hentenryck
Recent years have witnessed increasing interest in optimization proxies, i.e., machine learning models that approximate the input-output mapping of parametric optimization problems and return near-optimal feasible solutions. Following recent work by (Nellikkath & Chatzivasileiadis, 2021), this paper reconsiders the optimality verification problem for optimization proxies, i.e., the determination of the worst-case optimality gap over the instance distribution. The paper proposes a compact formulation for optimality verification and a gradient-based primal heuristic that brings substantial computational benefits to the original formulation. The compact formulation is also more general and applies to non-convex optimization problems. The benefits of the compact formulation are demonstrated on large-scale DC Optimal Power Flow and knapsack problems.
Read more6/3/2024
🛠️
0
Scalable Exact Verification of Optimization Proxies for Large-Scale Optimal Power Flow
Rahul Nellikkath, Mathieu Tanneau, Pascal Van Hentenryck, Spyros Chatzivasileiadis
Optimal Power Flow (OPF) is a valuable tool for power system operators, but it is a difficult problem to solve for large systems. Machine Learning (ML) algorithms, especially Neural Networks-based (NN) optimization proxies, have emerged as a promising new tool for solving OPF, by estimating the OPF solution much faster than traditional methods. However, these ML algorithms act as black boxes, and it is hard to assess their worst-case performance across the entire range of possible inputs than an OPF can have. Previous work has proposed a mixed-integer programming-based methodology to quantify the worst-case violations caused by a NN trained to estimate the OPF solution, throughout the entire input domain. This approach, however, does not scale well to large power systems and more complex NN models. This paper addresses these issues by proposing a scalable algorithm to compute worst-case violations of NN proxies used for approximating large power systems within a reasonable time limit. This will help build trust in ML models to be deployed in large industry-scale power grids.
Read more5/13/2024
0
Convex Relaxations of ReLU Neural Networks Approximate Global Optima in Polynomial Time
Sungyoon Kim, Mert Pilanci
In this paper, we study the optimality gap between two-layer ReLU networks regularized with weight decay and their convex relaxations. We show that when the training data is random, the relative optimality gap between the original problem and its relaxation can be bounded by a factor of O(log n^0.5), where n is the number of training samples. A simple application leads to a tractable polynomial-time algorithm that is guaranteed to solve the original non-convex problem up to a logarithmic factor. Moreover, under mild assumptions, we show that local gradient methods converge to a point with low training loss with high probability. Our result is an exponential improvement compared to existing results and sheds new light on understanding why local gradient methods work well.
Read more7/15/2024
🛠️
0
Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization
Haoxian Chen, Henry Lam
Bayesian Optimization is a popular approach for optimizing expensive black-box functions. Its key idea is to use a surrogate model to approximate the objective and, importantly, quantify the associated uncertainty that allows a sequential search of query points that balance exploitation-exploration. Gaussian process (GP) has been a primary candidate for the surrogate model, thanks to its Bayesian-principled uncertainty quantification power and modeling flexibility. However, its challenges have also spurred an array of alternatives whose convergence properties could be more opaque. Motivated by these, we study in this paper an axiomatic framework that elicits the minimal requirements to guarantee black-box optimization convergence that could apply beyond GP-based methods. Moreover, we leverage the design freedom in our framework, which we call Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization, to construct empirically superior algorithms. In particular, we show how using simple local regression, and a suitable randomized prior construction to quantify uncertainty, not only guarantees convergence but also consistently outperforms state-of-the-art benchmarks in examples ranging from high-dimensional synthetic experiments to realistic hyperparameter tuning and robotic applications.
Read more6/21/2024