Comparative Analysis of Different Efficient Fine Tuning Methods of Large Language Models (LLMs) in Low-Resource Setting
2405.13181
0
0
💬
Abstract
In the domain of large language models (LLMs), arXiv:2305.16938 showed that few-shot full-model fine-tuning -- namely Vanilla Fine Tuning (FT) and Pattern-Based Fine Tuning (PBFT) --, and In-Context Learning (ICL) generalize similarly on Out-Of-Domain (OOD) datasets, but vary in terms of task adaptation. However, they both pose challenges, especially in term of memory requirements. In this paper, we further try to push the understanding of different fine-tuning strategies for LLM and aim to bring a myriad of these on the same pedestal for an elaborate comparison with full-model fine-tuning on two diverse datasets. To that end, we conducted a series of experiments, beginning with state-of-the-art methods like vanilla fine-tuning and Pattern-Based Fine-Tuning (PBFT) on pre-trained models across two datasets, COLA and MNLI. We then investigate adaptive fine-tuning and the efficiency of LoRA adapters in a few-shot setting. Finally, we also compare an alternative approach that has gained recent popularity -- context distillation -- with the vanilla FT and PBFT with and without few-shot setup. Our findings suggest that these alternative strategies that we explored can exhibit out-of-domain generalization comparable to that of vanilla FT and PBFT. PBFT under-performs Vanilla FT on out-of-domain (OOD) data, emphasizing the need for effective prompts. Further, our adaptive-fine tuning and LoRA experiments perform comparable or slightly worse than the standard fine-tunings as anticipated, since standard fine-tunings involve tuning the entire model. Finally, our context distillation experiments out-perform the standard fine-tuning methods. These findings underscore that eventually the choice of an appropriate fine-tuning method depends on the available resources (memory, compute, data) and task adaptability.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores different fine-tuning strategies for large language models (LLMs) and how they compare in terms of out-of-domain (OOD) generalization and task adaptation.
- The strategies examined include Vanilla Fine Tuning (FT), Pattern-Based Fine Tuning (PBFT), In-Context Learning (ICL), adaptive fine-tuning, LoRA adapters, and context distillation.
- The researchers conducted experiments on two diverse datasets, COLA and MNLI, to compare the performance and characteristics of these fine-tuning strategies.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looked at different ways to fine-tune or adapt large language models to specific tasks. Fine-tuning means taking a pre-trained model and adjusting its parameters to work well on a new task, like answering questions or generating text. The researchers compared several fine-tuning approaches to see how they perform on new, unfamiliar datasets.
Some of the techniques they tested were Vanilla Fine Tuning, where you update the entire model, and Pattern-Based Fine Tuning, which uses special prompts to guide the model. They also looked at In-Context Learning, which doesn't update the model's parameters but instead relies on the input prompts.
Additionally, the researchers explored adaptive fine-tuning methods, like LoRA adapters, that only update a small part of the model instead of the whole thing. This can be more efficient in terms of memory and computation. Finally, they tested context distillation, which is a different approach that extracts key information from the model without directly fine-tuning it.
The key finding was that these alternative fine-tuning strategies can perform comparably to the standard full-model fine-tuning approaches in terms of generalization to new, unseen data. However, the choice of which method to use depends on the available resources, like memory and compute power, as well as the specific requirements of the task.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by noting that while Vanilla Fine Tuning (FT) and Pattern-Based Fine Tuning (PBFT) have similar out-of-domain (OOD) generalization performance to In-Context Learning (ICL), they differ in their task adaptation capabilities. However, both full-model fine-tuning approaches come with challenges, particularly in terms of memory requirements.
To further understand these fine-tuning strategies, the researchers conducted a series of experiments. They started with state-of-the-art methods like Vanilla FT and PBFT on pre-trained models across two datasets, COLA and MNLI. They then investigated adaptive fine-tuning and the efficiency of LoRA adapters in a few-shot setting.
Finally, the researchers also compared an alternative approach called context distillation with the Vanilla FT and PBFT methods, both with and without few-shot setups.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive comparison of various fine-tuning strategies for large language models, which is valuable for researchers and practitioners in the field. However, it is worth noting that the experiments were conducted on only two datasets, COLA and MNLI, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the nuances of how the different fine-tuning approaches impact the model's internal representations or decision-making processes. Further research could explore these mechanisms to gain a deeper understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each method.
It would also be interesting to see how these fine-tuning strategies perform on a wider range of tasks, including more complex and open-ended ones, to better assess their real-world applicability and limitations.
Conclusion
The paper presents a thorough investigation into the trade-offs between different fine-tuning strategies for large language models. The key takeaway is that alternative approaches, such as adaptive fine-tuning and context distillation, can exhibit OOD generalization comparable to standard full-model fine-tuning, while potentially requiring fewer resources.
These findings suggest that the choice of fine-tuning method should be tailored to the specific constraints and requirements of the task at hand, considering factors like available memory, compute power, and the need for task adaptation. As the field of large language models continues to evolve, this research contributes to a better understanding of the nuances and trade-offs in fine-tuning strategies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Fine-Tuning or Fine-Failing? Debunking Performance Myths in Large Language Models
Scott Barnett, Zac Brannelly, Stefanus Kurniawan, Sheng Wong
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have the unique capability to understand and generate human-like text from input queries. When fine-tuned, these models show enhanced performance on domain-specific queries. OpenAI highlights the process of fine-tuning, stating: To fine-tune a model, you are required to provide at least 10 examples. We typically see clear improvements from fine-tuning on 50 to 100 training examples, but the right number varies greatly based on the exact use case. This study extends this concept to the integration of LLMs within Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines, which aim to improve accuracy and relevance by leveraging external corpus data for information retrieval. However, RAG's promise of delivering optimal responses often falls short in complex query scenarios. This study aims to specifically examine the effects of fine-tuning LLMs on their ability to extract and integrate contextual data to enhance the performance of RAG systems across multiple domains. We evaluate the impact of fine-tuning on the LLMs' capacity for data extraction and contextual understanding by comparing the accuracy and completeness of fine-tuned models against baseline performances across datasets from multiple domains. Our findings indicate that fine-tuning resulted in a decline in performance compared to the baseline models, contrary to the improvements observed in standalone LLM applications as suggested by OpenAI. This study highlights the need for vigorous investigation and validation of fine-tuned models for domain-specific tasks.
7/2/2024
An Empirical Study on Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for MultiModal Large Language Models
Xiongtao Zhou, Jie He, Yuhua Ke, Guangyao Zhu, V'ictor Guti'errez-Basulto, Jeff Z. Pan
0
0
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) fine-tuned with multimodal instruction datasets have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in multimodal tasks. However, fine-tuning all parameters of MLLMs has become challenging as they usually contain billions of parameters. To address this issue, we study parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods for MLLMs. We aim to identify effective methods for enhancing the performance of MLLMs in scenarios where only a limited number of parameters are trained. This paper conducts empirical studies using four popular PEFT methods to fine-tune the LLM component of open-source MLLMs. We present a comprehensive analysis that encompasses various aspects, including the impact of PEFT methods on various models, parameters and location of the PEFT module, size of fine-tuning data, model stability based on PEFT methods, MLLM's generalization, and hallucination. We evaluated four PEFT methods on seven datasets from two different categories: unseen and seen datasets. Across all experiments, we show that the adapter is the best-performing PEFT method. At the same time, fine-tuning the connector layers leads to improved performance in most MLLMs. Code and data are available at https://github.com/alenai97/PEFT-MLLM.git.
6/10/2024
🏷️
Comparison between parameter-efficient techniques and full fine-tuning: A case study on multilingual news article classification
Olesya Razuvayevskaya, Ben Wu, Joao A. Leite, Freddy Heppell, Ivan Srba, Carolina Scarton, Kalina Bontcheva, Xingyi Song
0
0
Adapters and Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) are parameter-efficient fine-tuning techniques designed to make the training of language models more efficient. Previous results demonstrated that these methods can even improve performance on some classification tasks. This paper complements the existing research by investigating how these techniques influence the classification performance and computation costs compared to full fine-tuning when applied to multilingual text classification tasks (genre, framing, and persuasion techniques detection; with different input lengths, number of predicted classes and classification difficulty), some of which have limited training data. In addition, we conduct in-depth analyses of their efficacy across different training scenarios (training on the original multilingual data; on the translations into English; and on a subset of English-only data) and different languages. Our findings provide valuable insights into the applicability of the parameter-efficient fine-tuning techniques, particularly to complex multilingual and multilabel classification tasks.
4/9/2024
Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of LLaMA for the Clinical Domain
Aryo Pradipta Gema, Pasquale Minervini, Luke Daines, Tom Hope, Beatrice Alex
0
0
Adapting pretrained language models to novel domains, such as clinical applications, traditionally involves retraining their entire set of parameters. Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) techniques for fine-tuning language models significantly reduce computational requirements by selectively fine-tuning small subsets of parameters. In this study, we propose a two-step PEFT framework and evaluate it in the clinical domain. Our approach combines a specialised PEFT adapter layer designed for clinical domain adaptation with another adapter specialised for downstream tasks. We evaluate the framework on multiple clinical outcome prediction datasets, comparing it to clinically trained language models. Our framework achieves a better AUROC score averaged across all clinical downstream tasks compared to clinical language models. In particular, we observe large improvements of 4-5% AUROC in large-scale multilabel classification tasks, such as diagnoses and procedures classification. To our knowledge, this study is the first to provide an extensive empirical analysis of the interplay between PEFT techniques and domain adaptation in an important real-world domain of clinical applications.
6/11/2024