A Systematic Survey of Text Summarization: From Statistical Methods to Large Language Models
2406.11289
0
0
Abstract
Text summarization research has undergone several significant transformations with the advent of deep neural networks, pre-trained language models (PLMs), and recent large language models (LLMs). This survey thus provides a comprehensive review of the research progress and evolution in text summarization through the lens of these paradigm shifts. It is organized into two main parts: (1) a detailed overview of datasets, evaluation metrics, and summarization methods before the LLM era, encompassing traditional statistical methods, deep learning approaches, and PLM fine-tuning techniques, and (2) the first detailed examination of recent advancements in benchmarking, modeling, and evaluating summarization in the LLM era. By synthesizing existing literature and presenting a cohesive overview, this survey also discusses research trends, open challenges, and proposes promising research directions in summarization, aiming to guide researchers through the evolving landscape of summarization research.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive survey of text summarization techniques, covering statistical methods and the latest developments in large language models (LLMs).
- It traces the evolution of text summarization from early approaches to the current state-of-the-art, highlighting the major advancements and challenges in the field.
- The paper explores the capabilities of modern LLMs and how they have transformed the landscape of text summarization, outperforming traditional statistical methods in many tasks.
- It also discusses the evaluation of text summarization systems, addressing the complexities and limitations of current evaluation metrics.
Plain English Explanation
Text summarization is the process of taking a long piece of text, like an article or a book, and condensing it down to the key points and essential information. This paper looks at the different ways researchers have tackled this problem over the years.
The paper covers the history of text summarization, starting with early statistical methods that tried to identify important sentences or words. As technology advanced, the field moved towards more sophisticated deep learning models, culminating in the recent breakthroughs with large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3.
These powerful LLMs can now generate human-like summaries that are often better than what traditional approaches could produce. The paper explains how LLMs work and how they've transformed text summarization, allowing computers to understand context and meaning in ways they couldn't before.
The paper also discusses the challenges of evaluating text summarization systems. It's not always easy to determine if a summary is "good" or not, and the paper looks at the pros and cons of different evaluation metrics used by researchers.
Overall, this paper provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution of text summarization, from its early beginnings to the cutting-edge developments powered by large language models. It's a valuable resource for anyone interested in understanding how computers are getting better at extracting the key points from large amounts of text.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by tracing the history of text summarization, starting with early statistical approaches that focused on identifying important sentences or words based on features like word frequency and position in the text. As machine learning and deep learning techniques advanced, researchers developed more sophisticated models that could better capture the semantic and syntactic relationships in text.
The paper then delves into the recent breakthroughs in text summarization enabled by large language models (LLMs). These powerful models, trained on vast amounts of text data, can now generate human-like summaries that often outperform traditional approaches. The paper explains the key architectural features and training strategies that allow LLMs to excel at text summarization tasks.
The paper also addresses the challenges of evaluating text summarization systems. Measuring the quality of a summary is complex, as it involves subjective judgments of relevance, coherence, and informativeness. The paper critically examines the strengths and limitations of commonly used evaluation metrics, such as ROUGE and BERTScore, and discusses potential avenues for improving summarization evaluation.
Finally, the paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current state-of-the-art in text summarization, highlighting the major advancements and remaining research challenges. It underscores the transformative impact of large language models and the potential for further improvements in summarization quality, as well as the need for more robust and reliable evaluation frameworks.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-researched survey of text summarization, covering both the historical developments and the most recent advancements enabled by large language models. The authors do an excellent job of highlighting the key milestones and the significant breakthroughs that have shaped the field.
One of the strengths of the paper is its balanced approach, acknowledging both the successes and the limitations of current text summarization techniques. The authors rightly point out the complexities and challenges involved in evaluating the quality of summaries, and they underscore the need for more robust and reliable evaluation metrics.
However, the paper could have delved deeper into some of the potential biases and ethical concerns associated with large language models, particularly in the context of text summarization. As these models become more powerful and influential, it will be crucial to address issues such as the amplification of societal biases, the potential for misinformation, and the impact on human labor and employment.
Overall, this paper serves as an invaluable resource for researchers and practitioners working in the field of text summarization. It provides a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art and offers a solid foundation for understanding the challenges and opportunities in this rapidly evolving domain.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive survey of text summarization, tracing its evolution from early statistical methods to the latest advancements enabled by large language models. It highlights the significant progress made in the field, with LLMs now capable of generating human-like summaries that often outperform traditional approaches.
The paper also critically examines the complexities and limitations of current evaluation metrics, underscoring the need for more robust and reliable frameworks to assess the quality of summarization systems. As large language models continue to push the boundaries of what's possible in text summarization, it will be crucial to address the ethical and societal implications of these powerful technologies.
Overall, this paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and anyone interested in understanding the past, present, and future of text summarization. It provides a comprehensive overview of the field and offers insights into the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
New!A Comparative Study of Quality Evaluation Methods for Text Summarization
Huyen Nguyen, Haihua Chen, Lavanya Pobbathi, Junhua Ding
0
0
Evaluating text summarization has been a challenging task in natural language processing (NLP). Automatic metrics which heavily rely on reference summaries are not suitable in many situations, while human evaluation is time-consuming and labor-intensive. To bridge this gap, this paper proposes a novel method based on large language models (LLMs) for evaluating text summarization. We also conducts a comparative study on eight automatic metrics, human evaluation, and our proposed LLM-based method. Seven different types of state-of-the-art (SOTA) summarization models were evaluated. We perform extensive experiments and analysis on datasets with patent documents. Our results show that LLMs evaluation aligns closely with human evaluation, while widely-used automatic metrics such as ROUGE-2, BERTScore, and SummaC do not and also lack consistency. Based on the empirical comparison, we propose a LLM-powered framework for automatically evaluating and improving text summarization, which is beneficial and could attract wide attention among the community.
7/2/2024
💬
Can Large Language Model Summarizers Adapt to Diverse Scientific Communication Goals?
Marcio Fonseca, Shay B. Cohen
0
0
In this work, we investigate the controllability of large language models (LLMs) on scientific summarization tasks. We identify key stylistic and content coverage factors that characterize different types of summaries such as paper reviews, abstracts, and lay summaries. By controlling stylistic features, we find that non-fine-tuned LLMs outperform humans in the MuP review generation task, both in terms of similarity to reference summaries and human preferences. Also, we show that we can improve the controllability of LLMs with keyword-based classifier-free guidance (CFG) while achieving lexical overlap comparable to strong fine-tuned baselines on arXiv and PubMed. However, our results also indicate that LLMs cannot consistently generate long summaries with more than 8 sentences. Furthermore, these models exhibit limited capacity to produce highly abstractive lay summaries. Although LLMs demonstrate strong generic summarization competency, sophisticated content control without costly fine-tuning remains an open problem for domain-specific applications.
6/28/2024
A Comprehensive Survey of Scientific Large Language Models and Their Applications in Scientific Discovery
Yu Zhang, Xiusi Chen, Bowen Jin, Sheng Wang, Shuiwang Ji, Wei Wang, Jiawei Han
0
0
In many scientific fields, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the way with which text and other modalities of data (e.g., molecules and proteins) are dealt, achieving superior performance in various applications and augmenting the scientific discovery process. Nevertheless, previous surveys on scientific LLMs often concentrate on one to two fields or a single modality. In this paper, we aim to provide a more holistic view of the research landscape by unveiling cross-field and cross-modal connections between scientific LLMs regarding their architectures and pre-training techniques. To this end, we comprehensively survey over 250 scientific LLMs, discuss their commonalities and differences, as well as summarize pre-training datasets and evaluation tasks for each field and modality. Moreover, we investigate how LLMs have been deployed to benefit scientific discovery. Resources related to this survey are available at https://github.com/yuzhimanhua/Awesome-Scientific-Language-Models.
6/18/2024
LaMSUM: A Novel Framework for Extractive Summarization of User Generated Content using LLMs
Garima Chhikara, Anurag Sharma, V. Gurucharan, Kripabandhu Ghosh, Abhijnan Chakraborty
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance across a wide range of NLP tasks, including summarization. Inherently LLMs produce abstractive summaries, and the task of achieving extractive summaries through LLMs still remains largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, in this work, we propose a novel framework LaMSUM to generate extractive summaries through LLMs for large user-generated text by leveraging voting algorithms. Our evaluation on three popular open-source LLMs (Llama 3, Mixtral and Gemini) reveal that the LaMSUM outperforms state-of-the-art extractive summarization methods. We further attempt to provide the rationale behind the output summary produced by LLMs. Overall, this is one of the early attempts to achieve extractive summarization for large user-generated text by utilizing LLMs, and likely to generate further interest in the community.
6/26/2024