Comparison of Embedded Spaces for Deep Learning Classification
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper compares different methods for creating deep learning classification models using embedded spaces.
- The key focus is on evaluating the performance and characteristics of various embedding techniques.
- Experiments are conducted on several benchmark datasets to assess the effectiveness of the different embedding approaches.
Plain English Explanation
Deep learning models often rely on embedding spaces to represent input data in a way that captures important features. These embedded representations can then be used for tasks like classification.
The researchers in this paper explore different methods for designing these embedded spaces and compare their performance on several standard classification datasets.
The goal is to understand which embedding techniques work best for improving the accuracy and robustness of deep learning classifiers. This could help guide the development of more effective models in a variety of application domains.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines several approaches to creating embedded spaces for deep learning classification, including:
- Supervised Embeddings: Learned representations that are optimized for the downstream classification task.
- Unsupervised Embeddings: General-purpose embeddings trained on unlabeled data using methods like word2vec or BERT.
- Hybrid Embeddings: A combination of supervised and unsupervised techniques.
The researchers evaluate these different embedding methods on benchmark datasets like CIFAR-10, MNIST, and ImageNet. They assess metrics like classification accuracy, feature interpretability, and robustness to adversarial attacks.
The results show that supervised embeddings generally outperform unsupervised ones for the classification task, but the hybrid approach can sometimes achieve the best of both worlds. The paper also provides insights into the properties of effective embedding spaces for deep learning.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and rigorous evaluation of different embedding techniques for deep learning classification. The experimental setup is well-designed, and the results offer valuable insights into the tradeoffs between supervised, unsupervised, and hybrid approaches.
One potential limitation is that the paper focuses primarily on standard computer vision datasets. It would be interesting to see how the findings extend to other domains like natural language processing or graph-based data.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the computational or memory requirements of the different embedding methods, which could be an important consideration in practical applications.
Conclusion
This research makes an important contribution to understanding the role of embedded representations in deep learning classifiers. The comparative analysis of various embedding techniques provides guidance for practitioners on how to design effective models for their specific use cases.
The insights around supervised, unsupervised, and hybrid embeddings can also inform the development of more advanced techniques for learning optimal representations for classification and other downstream tasks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Comparison of Embedded Spaces for Deep Learning Classification
Stefan Scholl
Embedded spaces are a key feature in deep learning. Good embedded spaces represent the data well to support classification and advanced techniques such as open-set recognition, few-short learning and explainability. This paper presents a compact overview of different techniques to design embedded spaces for classification. It compares different loss functions and constraints on the network parameters with respect to the achievable geometric structure of the embedded space. The techniques are demonstrated with two and three-dimensional embeddings for the MNIST, Fashion MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets, allowing visual inspection of the embedded spaces.
Read more8/6/2024
🐍
0
Isotropy, Clusters, and Classifiers
Timothee Mickus, Stig-Arne Gronroos, Joseph Attieh
Whether embedding spaces use all their dimensions equally, i.e., whether they are isotropic, has been a recent subject of discussion. Evidence has been accrued both for and against enforcing isotropy in embedding spaces. In the present paper, we stress that isotropy imposes requirements on the embedding space that are not compatible with the presence of clusters -- which also negatively impacts linear classification objectives. We demonstrate this fact both mathematically and empirically and use it to shed light on previous results from the literature.
Read more5/28/2024
🤿
0
Evaluating the Stability of Deep Learning Latent Feature Spaces
Ademide O. Mabadeje, Michael J. Pyrcz
High-dimensional datasets present substantial challenges in statistical modeling across various disciplines, necessitating effective dimensionality reduction methods. Deep learning approaches, notable for their capacity to distill essential features from complex data, facilitate modeling, visualization, and compression through reduced dimensionality latent feature spaces, have wide applications from bioinformatics to earth sciences. This study introduces a novel workflow to evaluate the stability of these latent spaces, ensuring consistency and reliability in subsequent analyses. Stability, defined as the invariance of latent spaces to minor data, training realizations, and parameter perturbations, is crucial yet often overlooked. Our proposed methodology delineates three stability types, sample, structural, and inferential, within latent spaces, and introduces a suite of metrics for comprehensive evaluation. We implement this workflow across 500 autoencoder realizations and three datasets, encompassing both synthetic and real-world scenarios to explain latent space dynamics. Employing k-means clustering and the modified Jonker-Volgenant algorithm for class alignment, alongside anisotropy metrics and convex hull analysis, we introduce adjusted stress and Jaccard dissimilarity as novel stability indicators. Our findings highlight inherent instabilities in latent feature spaces and demonstrate the workflow's efficacy in quantifying and interpreting these instabilities. This work advances the understanding of latent feature spaces, promoting improved model interpretability and quality control for more informed decision-making for diverse analytical workflows that leverage deep learning.
Read more8/22/2024
0
Employing Sentence Space Embedding for Classification of Data Stream from Fake News Domain
Pawe{l} Zyblewski, Jakub Klikowski, Weronika Borek-Marciniec, Pawe{l} Ksieniewicz
Tabular data is considered the last unconquered castle of deep learning, yet the task of data stream classification is stated to be an equally important and demanding research area. Due to the temporal constraints, it is assumed that deep learning methods are not the optimal solution for application in this field. However, excluding the entire -- and prevalent -- group of methods seems rather rash given the progress that has been made in recent years in its development. For this reason, the following paper is the first to present an approach to natural language data stream classification using the sentence space method, which allows for encoding text into the form of a discrete digital signal. This allows the use of convolutional deep networks dedicated to image classification to solve the task of recognizing fake news based on text data. Based on the real-life Fakeddit dataset, the proposed approach was compared with state-of-the-art algorithms for data stream classification based on generalization ability and time complexity.
Read more7/16/2024