Complex fractal trainability boundary can arise from trivial non-convexity
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how a complex fractal-like trainability boundary can emerge from a simple non-convex optimization problem in machine learning.
- The authors demonstrate that even trivial non-convexities in the loss function can lead to intricate fractal-like patterns in the trainability of neural networks.
- This challenges the notion that complex fractal-like boundaries are necessarily indicative of more fundamental complexities in the optimization landscape.
Plain English Explanation
In machine learning, the trainability of a neural network refers to how easy or difficult it is to train the network to perform a certain task. The loss function is a mathematical formula that measures how well the network is performing, and the goal of training is to minimize this loss function.
The authors of this paper show that even simple, trivial non-convexities (i.e., non-straight-line shapes) in the loss function can lead to complex, fractal-like patterns in the trainability of the network. This means that there can be intricate "islands" of good trainability surrounded by "seas" of poor trainability, all stemming from a relatively simple underlying loss function.
This challenges the common assumption that complex fractal-like trainability boundaries must be indicative of more fundamental complexities in the optimization landscape. The paper on "Limitations of fractal dimension as a measure of generalization" had suggested that fractal-like trainability patterns could be a sign of deeper issues. But this new paper shows that such patterns can actually arise from very simple non-convexities, without necessarily indicating any deeper problems.
Technical Explanation
The authors use a simple optimization problem with a non-convex loss function to demonstrate how complex fractal-like trainability boundaries can arise. Specifically, they consider a two-dimensional optimization problem where the loss function is the sum of a convex function and a non-convex "bump" function.
Despite the relative simplicity of this setup, the authors show that the resulting trainability landscape exhibits intricate fractal-like patterns. They analyze the geometry of these patterns and find that they are determined by the interplay between the convex and non-convex components of the loss function.
The authors draw connections between their findings and recent work on the Goldilocks zone for neural network initialization and the emergence of criticality in dataset learning. They also relate their results to the theoretical understanding of deep neural network training and visualizations of loss landscapes.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge that their analysis is limited to a specific, relatively simple optimization problem. It remains to be seen whether the same principles apply to more complex neural network architectures and training scenarios.
Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the emergence of fractal-like trainability boundaries from trivial non-convexities, it does not fully address the question of whether such patterns are necessarily indicative of deeper issues in the optimization landscape. Further research may be needed to understand the relationship between fractal-like trainability and the broader properties of the loss function.
Nevertheless, the paper provides an important counterpoint to the assumption that complex fractal-like patterns always signal more fundamental complexities in machine learning optimization. It suggests that caution is warranted when interpreting the significance of such patterns.
Conclusion
This paper challenges the common assumption that complex fractal-like trainability boundaries in machine learning are necessarily indicative of deeper issues in the optimization landscape. By demonstrating how such patterns can arise from simple non-convexities in the loss function, the authors show that the presence of fractal-like structures does not necessarily imply more fundamental complexities.
This work has important implications for our understanding of the optimization challenges faced by modern machine learning models. It suggests that we should be cautious in interpreting the significance of complex trainability patterns and look more closely at the underlying mathematical structure of the optimization problem.
Overall, this paper offers valuable insights into the complex interplay between the geometry of the loss function and the trainability of neural networks, paving the way for a more nuanced and sophisticated understanding of machine learning optimization.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Complex fractal trainability boundary can arise from trivial non-convexity
Yizhou Liu
Training neural networks involves optimizing parameters to minimize a loss function, where the nature of the loss function and the optimization strategy are crucial for effective training. Hyperparameter choices, such as the learning rate in gradient descent (GD), significantly affect the success and speed of convergence. Recent studies indicate that the boundary between bounded and divergent hyperparameters can be fractal, complicating reliable hyperparameter selection. However, the nature of this fractal boundary and methods to avoid it remain unclear. In this study, we focus on GD to investigate the loss landscape properties that might lead to fractal trainability boundaries. We discovered that fractal boundaries can emerge from simple non-convex perturbations, i.e., adding or multiplying cosine type perturbations to quadratic functions. The observed fractal dimensions are influenced by factors like parameter dimension, type of non-convexity, perturbation wavelength, and perturbation amplitude. Our analysis identifies roughness of perturbation, which measures the gradient's sensitivity to parameter changes, as the factor controlling fractal dimensions of trainability boundaries. We observed a clear transition from non-fractal to fractal trainability boundaries as roughness increases, with the critical roughness causing the perturbed loss function non-convex. Thus, we conclude that fractal trainability boundaries can arise from very simple non-convexity. We anticipate that our findings will enhance the understanding of complex behaviors during neural network training, leading to more consistent and predictable training strategies.
Read more6/21/2024
0
On the Limitations of Fractal Dimension as a Measure of Generalization
Charlie Tan, In'es Garc'ia-Redondo, Qiquan Wang, Michael M. Bronstein, Anthea Monod
Bounding and predicting the generalization gap of overparameterized neural networks remains a central open problem in theoretical machine learning. Neural network optimization trajectories have been proposed to possess fractal structure, leading to bounds and generalization measures based on notions of fractal dimension on these trajectories. Prominently, both the Hausdorff dimension and the persistent homology dimension have been proposed to correlate with generalization gap, thus serving as a measure of generalization. This work performs an extended evaluation of these topological generalization measures. We demonstrate that fractal dimension fails to predict generalization of models trained from poor initializations. We further identify that the $ell^2$ norm of the final parameter iterate, one of the simplest complexity measures in learning theory, correlates more strongly with the generalization gap than these notions of fractal dimension. Finally, our study reveals the intriguing manifestation of model-wise double descent in persistent homology-based generalization measures. This work lays the ground for a deeper investigation of the causal relationships between fractal geometry, topological data analysis, and neural network optimization.
Read more6/5/2024
🗣️
0
There is a Singularity in the Loss Landscape
Mark Lowell
Despite the widespread adoption of neural networks, their training dynamics remain poorly understood. We show experimentally that as the size of the dataset increases, a point forms where the magnitude of the gradient of the loss becomes unbounded. Gradient descent rapidly brings the network close to this singularity in parameter space, and further training takes place near it. This singularity explains a variety of phenomena recently observed in the Hessian of neural network loss functions, such as training on the edge of stability and the concentration of the gradient in a top subspace. Once the network approaches the singularity, the top subspace contributes little to learning, even though it constitutes the majority of the gradient.
Read more7/23/2024
🛠️
0
Learning Non-Vacuous Generalization Bounds from Optimization
Chengli Tan, Jiangshe Zhang, Junmin Liu
One of the fundamental challenges in the deep learning community is to theoretically understand how well a deep neural network generalizes to unseen data. However, current approaches often yield generalization bounds that are either too loose to be informative of the true generalization error or only valid to the compressed nets. In this study, we present a simple yet non-vacuous generalization bound from the optimization perspective. We achieve this goal by leveraging that the hypothesis set accessed by stochastic gradient algorithms is essentially fractal-like and thus can derive a tighter bound over the algorithm-dependent Rademacher complexity. The main argument rests on modeling the discrete-time recursion process via a continuous-time stochastic differential equation driven by fractional Brownian motion. Numerical studies demonstrate that our approach is able to yield plausible generalization guarantees for modern neural networks such as ResNet and Vision Transformer, even when they are trained on a large-scale dataset (e.g. ImageNet-1K).
Read more7/23/2024