Comprehensive AI Assessment Framework: Enhancing Educational Evaluation with Ethical AI Integration
0
🤖
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines the integration of generative AI (GenAI) tools into education
- Presents the Comprehensive AI Assessment Framework (CAIAF) to guide the ethical use of AI in educational assessments
- CAIAF is an evolved version of the AI Assessment Scale (AIAS) that incorporates ethical guidelines, educational level distinctions, and advanced AI capabilities
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses how the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools in education has created both new opportunities and challenges. To help address these issues, the authors have developed the Comprehensive AI Assessment Framework (CAIAF), which builds upon an earlier framework called the AI Assessment Scale (AIAS).
The key difference with CAIAF is that it places a strong emphasis on ethical considerations. It provides clear guidelines on how to use AI responsibly in educational assessments, taking into account different educational levels and the advanced capabilities of AI, such as real-time interactions and personalized assistance.
The framework is designed to be user-friendly, with a color gradient system that makes it easy to understand. It was developed through an extensive literature review and practical insights, making it a dynamic tool that can be used in various educational settings.
The goal of the CAIAF is to help ensure better learning outcomes, maintain academic integrity, and promote the responsible use of AI in education. This is crucial as AI is becoming increasingly prevalent in educational measurement and assessment.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents the Comprehensive AI Assessment Framework (CAIAF), which is an evolved version of the AI Assessment Scale (AIAS) developed by Perkins, Furze, Roe, and MacVaugh. The CAIAF is specifically designed to guide the ethical integration of AI into educational assessments.
The key differences between CAIAF and AIAS are:
- Ethical guidelines: CAIAF incorporates stringent ethical guidelines to ensure the responsible use of AI in educational settings.
- Educational level distinctions: The framework makes clear distinctions based on different educational levels (e.g., primary, secondary, tertiary).
- Advanced AI capabilities: CAIAF considers the advanced capabilities of AI, such as real-time interactions and personalized assistance.
The framework is highly intuitive, using a color gradient system to enhance user-friendliness. The development of the CAIAF was informed by a thorough literature review and practical insights, making it a dynamic tool that can be applied in various educational contexts.
The goal of the CAIAF is to promote better learning outcomes, uphold academic integrity, and encourage the responsible use of AI in modern educational practices.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and well-researched framework for the ethical integration of AI into educational assessments. The authors have addressed key concerns, such as the need for ethical guidelines, educational level distinctions, and the consideration of advanced AI capabilities.
However, the paper does not delve deeply into potential limitations or areas for further research. For example, it would be useful to explore how the CAIAF can be implemented in practice, the challenges that may arise, and how to address potential issues that may emerge.
Additionally, the paper could have explored the broader implications of AI in education, such as the impact on teaching and learning methodologies, the need for educator training and development, and the potential risks of AI-driven assessment on student well-being and equity.
Overall, the CAIAF is a promising framework that addresses an important and timely issue in the field of AI-powered educational research and assessment. Further research and practical applications of the framework could provide valuable insights and refinements.
Conclusion
The paper presents the Comprehensive AI Assessment Framework (CAIAF), which is an evolved version of the AI Assessment Scale (AIAS) designed to guide the ethical integration of AI into educational assessments. The CAIAF incorporates stringent ethical guidelines, educational level distinctions, and advanced AI capabilities, making it a comprehensive and user-friendly framework.
The development of the CAIAF is a significant contribution to the field of AI-powered education, as it addresses the growing need to ensure that the use of AI in assessments is responsible, ethical, and aligned with educational goals. By promoting better learning outcomes, upholding academic integrity, and encouraging the responsible use of AI, the CAIAF can play a crucial role in shaping the future of educational practices in the age of artificial intelligence.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
0
Comprehensive AI Assessment Framework: Enhancing Educational Evaluation with Ethical AI Integration
Selc{c}uk K{i}l{i}nc{c}
The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools into education has been a game-changer for teaching and assessment practices, bringing new opportunities, but also novel challenges which need to be dealt with. This paper presents the Comprehensive AI Assessment Framework (CAIAF), an evolved version of the AI Assessment Scale (AIAS) by Perkins, Furze, Roe, and MacVaugh, targeted toward the ethical integration of AI into educational assessments. This is where the CAIAF differs, as it incorporates stringent ethical guidelines, with clear distinctions based on educational levels, and advanced AI capabilities of real-time interactions and personalized assistance. The framework developed herein has a very intuitive use, mainly through the use of a color gradient that enhances the user-friendliness of the framework. Methodologically, the framework has been developed through the huge support of a thorough literature review and practical insight into the topic, becoming a dynamic tool to be used in different educational settings. The framework will ensure better learning outcomes, uphold academic integrity, and promote responsible use of AI, hence the need for this framework in modern educational practice.
Read more7/25/2024
🚀
0
Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research: Authentic Research Education Framework
Sergey V Samsonau, Aziza Kurbonova, Lu Jiang, Hazem Lashen, Jiamu Bai, Theresa Merchant, Ruoxi Wang, Laiba Mehnaz, Zecheng Wang, Ishita Patil
We report a framework that enables the wide adoption of authentic research educational methodology at various schools by addressing common barriers. The guiding principles we present were applied to implement a program in which teams of students with complementary skills develop useful artificial intelligence (AI) solutions for researchers in natural sciences. To accomplish this, we work with research laboratories that reveal/specify their needs, and then our student teams work on the discovery, design, and development of an AI solution for unique problems using a consulting-like arrangement. To date, our group has been operating at New York University (NYU) for seven consecutive semesters, has engaged more than a hundred students, ranging from first-year college students to master's candidates, and has worked with more than twenty projects and collaborators. While creating education benefits for students, our approach also directly benefits scientists, who get an opportunity to evaluate the usefulness of machine learning for their specific needs.
Read more7/9/2024
0
Integrating ESG and AI: A Comprehensive Responsible AI Assessment Framework
Sung Une Lee, Harsha Perera, Yue Liu, Boming Xia, Qinghua Lu, Liming Zhu, Jessica Cairns, Moana Nottage
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a widely developed and adopted technology across entire industry sectors. Integrating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations with AI investments is crucial for ensuring ethical and sustainable technological advancement. Particularly from an investor perspective, this integration not only mitigates risks but also enhances long-term value creation by aligning AI initiatives with broader societal goals. Yet, this area has been less explored in both academia and industry. To bridge the gap, we introduce a novel ESG-AI framework, which is developed based on insights from engagements with 28 companies and comprises three key components. The framework provides a structured approach to this integration, developed in collaboration with industry practitioners. The ESG-AI framework provides an overview of the environmental and social impacts of AI applications, helping users such as investors assess the materiality of AI use. Moreover, it enables investors to evaluate a company's commitment to responsible AI through structured engagements and thorough assessment of specific risk areas. We have publicly released the framework and toolkit in April 2024, which has received significant attention and positive feedback from the investment community. This paper details each component of the framework, demonstrating its applicability in real-world contexts and its potential to guide ethical AI investments.
Read more8/7/2024
🤖
0
Crafting Tomorrow's Evaluations: Assessment Design Strategies in the Era of Generative AI
Rajan Kadel, Bhupesh Kumar Mishra, Samar Shailendra, Samia Abid, Maneeha Rani, Shiva Prasad Mahato
GenAI has gained the attention of a myriad of users in almost every profession. Its advancement has had an intense impact on education, significantly disrupting the assessment design and evaluation methodologies. Despite the potential benefits and possibilities of GenAI in the education sector, there are several concerns primarily centred around academic integrity, authenticity, equity of access, assessment evaluation methodology, and feedback. Consequently, academia is encountering challenges in assessment design that are essential to retaining academic integrity in the age of GenAI. In this article, we discuss the challenges, and opportunities that need to be addressed for the assessment design and evaluation. The article also highlights the importance of clear policy about the usage of GenAI in completing assessment tasks, and also in design approaches to ensure academic integrity and subject learning. Additionally, this article also provides assessment categorisation based on the use of GenAI to cultivate knowledge among students and academic professionals. It also provides information on the skills necessary to formulate and articulate problems and evaluate the task, enabling students and academics to effectively utilise GenAI tools.
Read more5/6/2024