Integrating ESG and AI: A Comprehensive Responsible AI Assessment Framework
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a comprehensive framework for assessing the responsible development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems.
- The framework integrates environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles with key considerations for responsible AI.
- The authors aim to provide a structured approach to evaluating the ethical, inclusive, and sustainable implementation of AI in organizations.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a framework that combines ESG principles with important factors for developing and using AI responsibly. The goal is to give organizations a systematic way to assess whether their AI systems are being designed and deployed in an ethical, inclusive, and sustainable manner.
The framework covers a wide range of topics, such as:
- Ensuring AI systems respect human rights and avoid bias
- Making AI accessible and beneficial to diverse populations
- Minimizing the environmental impact of AI development and use
- Maintaining transparency and accountability around AI decision-making
By using this framework, organizations can identify potential issues or risks with their AI initiatives and take steps to address them. This can help foster public trust in AI and ensure the technology is deployed in a way that benefits society as a whole.
Technical Explanation
The paper first provides a background review of current frameworks and guidelines for responsible AI. It then proposes a new comprehensive assessment framework that integrates ESG factors with key considerations for ethical, inclusive, and sustainable AI.
The framework is structured around five main dimensions:
- Ethical AI: Ensuring AI systems respect human rights, avoid bias, and are transparent in their decision-making.
- Inclusive AI: Promoting accessibility and equitable benefits of AI for diverse populations.
- Sustainable AI: Minimizing the environmental impact of AI development and deployment.
- Governance: Maintaining strong oversight, accountability, and stakeholder engagement around AI.
- Capability Building: Developing the necessary skills and knowledge to implement responsible AI.
For each dimension, the framework provides detailed assessment criteria and guiding questions to help organizations evaluate the maturity of their AI practices. The authors also discuss how the framework can be applied in the context of educational institutions and their AI-based evaluation systems.
Critical Analysis
The framework presented in this paper is comprehensive and covers many important aspects of responsible AI development and deployment. However, the authors acknowledge that fully implementing such a framework would be a significant undertaking for most organizations.
One potential limitation is the subjective nature of some of the assessment criteria, which may make it challenging to consistently evaluate an organization's performance. The authors suggest further research is needed to refine the framework and provide more quantitative and objective measures.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the practical challenges organizations may face when trying to address identified issues or gaps in their AI practices. More guidance on overcoming organizational, technological, or regulatory barriers would be valuable.
Despite these minor caveats, the proposed framework represents a significant step forward in integrating ESG principles with responsible AI development. By providing a structured approach, the framework can help organizations navigate the complex landscape of ethical, inclusive, and sustainable AI.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive framework for assessing the responsible development and deployment of AI systems. By integrating ESG principles with key considerations for ethical, inclusive, and sustainable AI, the framework offers a structured approach for organizations to evaluate and improve their AI practices.
The framework's holistic perspective, covering a wide range of technical, social, and governance factors, makes it a valuable tool for fostering public trust and ensuring AI is implemented in a way that benefits society as a whole. As organizations continue to grapple with the challenges of responsible AI, this framework can serve as a valuable guide to help navigate this complex landscape.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Integrating ESG and AI: A Comprehensive Responsible AI Assessment Framework
Sung Une Lee, Harsha Perera, Yue Liu, Boming Xia, Qinghua Lu, Liming Zhu, Jessica Cairns, Moana Nottage
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a widely developed and adopted technology across entire industry sectors. Integrating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations with AI investments is crucial for ensuring ethical and sustainable technological advancement. Particularly from an investor perspective, this integration not only mitigates risks but also enhances long-term value creation by aligning AI initiatives with broader societal goals. Yet, this area has been less explored in both academia and industry. To bridge the gap, we introduce a novel ESG-AI framework, which is developed based on insights from engagements with 28 companies and comprises three key components. The framework provides a structured approach to this integration, developed in collaboration with industry practitioners. The ESG-AI framework provides an overview of the environmental and social impacts of AI applications, helping users such as investors assess the materiality of AI use. Moreover, it enables investors to evaluate a company's commitment to responsible AI through structured engagements and thorough assessment of specific risk areas. We have publicly released the framework and toolkit in April 2024, which has received significant attention and positive feedback from the investment community. This paper details each component of the framework, demonstrating its applicability in real-world contexts and its potential to guide ethical AI investments.
Read more8/7/2024
🤖
0
Comprehensive AI Assessment Framework: Enhancing Educational Evaluation with Ethical AI Integration
Selc{c}uk K{i}l{i}nc{c}
The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools into education has been a game-changer for teaching and assessment practices, bringing new opportunities, but also novel challenges which need to be dealt with. This paper presents the Comprehensive AI Assessment Framework (CAIAF), an evolved version of the AI Assessment Scale (AIAS) by Perkins, Furze, Roe, and MacVaugh, targeted toward the ethical integration of AI into educational assessments. This is where the CAIAF differs, as it incorporates stringent ethical guidelines, with clear distinctions based on educational levels, and advanced AI capabilities of real-time interactions and personalized assistance. The framework developed herein has a very intuitive use, mainly through the use of a color gradient that enhances the user-friendliness of the framework. Methodologically, the framework has been developed through the huge support of a thorough literature review and practical insight into the topic, becoming a dynamic tool to be used in different educational settings. The framework will ensure better learning outcomes, uphold academic integrity, and promote responsible use of AI, hence the need for this framework in modern educational practice.
Read more7/25/2024
0
Towards an Ethical and Inclusive Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Organizations: A Multidimensional Framework
Ernesto Giralt Hern'andez
This article analyzes the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on contemporary society and the importance of adopting an ethical approach to its development and implementation within organizations. It examines the technocritical perspective of some philosophers and researchers, who warn of the risks of excessive technologization that could undermine human autonomy. However, the article also acknowledges the active role that various actors, such as governments, academics, and civil society, can play in shaping the development of AI aligned with human and social values. A multidimensional approach is proposed that combines ethics with regulation, innovation, and education. It highlights the importance of developing detailed ethical frameworks, incorporating ethics into the training of professionals, conducting ethical impact audits, and encouraging the participation of stakeholders in the design of AI. In addition, four fundamental pillars are presented for the ethical implementation of AI in organizations: 1) Integrated values, 2) Trust and transparency, 3) Empowering human growth, and 4) Identifying strategic factors. These pillars encompass aspects such as alignment with the company's ethical identity, governance and accountability, human-centered design, continuous training, and adaptability to technological and market changes. The conclusion emphasizes that ethics must be the cornerstone of any organization's strategy that seeks to incorporate AI, establishing a solid framework that ensures that technology is developed and used in a way that respects and promotes human values.
Read more5/6/2024
0
Balancing Progress and Responsibility: A Synthesis of Sustainability Trade-Offs of AI-Based Systems
Apoorva Nalini Pradeep Kumar, Justus Bogner, Markus Funke, Patricia Lago
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities have increased the eagerness of companies to integrate AI into software systems. While AI can be used to have a positive impact on several dimensions of sustainability, this is often overshadowed by its potential negative influence. While many studies have explored sustainability factors in isolation, there is insufficient holistic coverage of potential sustainability benefits or costs that practitioners need to consider during decision-making for AI adoption. We therefore aim to synthesize trade-offs related to sustainability in the context of integrating AI into software systems. We want to make the sustainability benefits and costs of integrating AI more transparent and accessible for practitioners. The study was conducted in collaboration with a Dutch financial organization. We first performed a rapid review that led to the inclusion of 151 research papers. Afterward, we conducted six semi-structured interviews to enrich the data with industry perspectives. The combined results showcase the potential sustainability benefits and costs of integrating AI. The labels synthesized from the review regarding potential sustainability benefits were clustered into 16 themes, with energy management being the most frequently mentioned one. 11 themes were identified in the interviews, with the top mentioned theme being employee wellbeing. Regarding sustainability costs, the review discovered seven themes, with deployment issues being the most popular one, followed by ethics & society. Environmental issues was the top theme from the interviews. Our results provide valuable insights to organizations and practitioners for understanding the potential sustainability implications of adopting AI.
Read more4/8/2024