Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research: Authentic Research Education Framework

Read original: arXiv:2210.08966 - Published 7/9/2024 by Sergey V Samsonau, Aziza Kurbonova, Lu Jiang, Hazem Lashen, Jiamu Bai, Theresa Merchant, Ruoxi Wang, Laiba Mehnaz, Zecheng Wang, Ishita Patil
Total Score

0

🚀

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Presents a framework for implementing authentic research-based education methodology in schools
  • Focuses on enabling students to develop useful artificial intelligence (AI) solutions for researchers in natural sciences
  • Involves collaborating with research laboratories to identify their needs and having student teams work on developing AI solutions

Plain English Explanation

This paper describes a framework that aims to make research-based education more widely available in schools. The key idea is to have teams of students with diverse skills work on developing AI solutions for real problems faced by researchers in the natural sciences.

The process works as follows: The researchers in the natural sciences share their specific needs with the program. Then, student teams investigate the problem, design an AI-based solution, and develop it, similar to a consulting arrangement. This provides valuable experience for the students while also directly benefiting the scientists, who get to evaluate how machine learning could be useful for their work.

The program has been running for seven consecutive semesters at New York University, involving over a hundred students from various levels and more than twenty projects and collaborators. This shows the potential for integrating AI into higher education in a way that benefits both students and researchers.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a framework that enables the widespread adoption of authentic research-based education methodology in schools. The key principles of this framework were applied to implement a program where student teams with complementary skills develop useful AI solutions for researchers in the natural sciences.

The program works by collaborating with research laboratories to understand their specific needs. The student teams then go through a discovery, design, and development process to create AI-based solutions for these unique problems, similar to a consulting arrangement.

Over the course of seven semesters at New York University, the program has engaged more than a hundred students, ranging from first-year undergraduates to master's candidates, and has worked on over twenty projects with various collaborators. This approach directly benefits the scientists, who get to evaluate the usefulness of machine learning for their specific needs, while also providing valuable educational benefits for the students.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling framework for implementing authentic research-based education at scale, with a focus on empowering students to develop real-world AI solutions for researchers. The program's success over seven consecutive semesters suggests that this model can be effectively replicated in other educational settings.

However, the paper does not delve into potential challenges or limitations of the approach. For example, it would be interesting to understand how the program ensures the quality and robustness of the AI solutions developed by the student teams, as well as how it addresses any ethical considerations around the use of AI in research.

Additionally, the paper could benefit from a more detailed analysis of the specific learning outcomes and skills developed by the students through this program, which could help further validate its educational impact.

Conclusion

This paper presents a promising framework for enabling the widespread adoption of authentic research-based education, with a focus on empowering students to develop useful AI solutions for researchers in the natural sciences. The program's success over multiple semesters at New York University suggests that this model has the potential to be replicated in other educational institutions, providing valuable experiences for students while also directly benefiting the scientific community.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🚀

Total Score

0

Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research: Authentic Research Education Framework

Sergey V Samsonau, Aziza Kurbonova, Lu Jiang, Hazem Lashen, Jiamu Bai, Theresa Merchant, Ruoxi Wang, Laiba Mehnaz, Zecheng Wang, Ishita Patil

We report a framework that enables the wide adoption of authentic research educational methodology at various schools by addressing common barriers. The guiding principles we present were applied to implement a program in which teams of students with complementary skills develop useful artificial intelligence (AI) solutions for researchers in natural sciences. To accomplish this, we work with research laboratories that reveal/specify their needs, and then our student teams work on the discovery, design, and development of an AI solution for unique problems using a consulting-like arrangement. To date, our group has been operating at New York University (NYU) for seven consecutive semesters, has engaged more than a hundred students, ranging from first-year college students to master's candidates, and has worked with more than twenty projects and collaborators. While creating education benefits for students, our approach also directly benefits scientists, who get an opportunity to evaluate the usefulness of machine learning for their specific needs.

Read more

7/9/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Comprehensive AI Assessment Framework: Enhancing Educational Evaluation with Ethical AI Integration

Selc{c}uk K{i}l{i}nc{c}

The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools into education has been a game-changer for teaching and assessment practices, bringing new opportunities, but also novel challenges which need to be dealt with. This paper presents the Comprehensive AI Assessment Framework (CAIAF), an evolved version of the AI Assessment Scale (AIAS) by Perkins, Furze, Roe, and MacVaugh, targeted toward the ethical integration of AI into educational assessments. This is where the CAIAF differs, as it incorporates stringent ethical guidelines, with clear distinctions based on educational levels, and advanced AI capabilities of real-time interactions and personalized assistance. The framework developed herein has a very intuitive use, mainly through the use of a color gradient that enhances the user-friendliness of the framework. Methodologically, the framework has been developed through the huge support of a thorough literature review and practical insight into the topic, becoming a dynamic tool to be used in different educational settings. The framework will ensure better learning outcomes, uphold academic integrity, and promote responsible use of AI, hence the need for this framework in modern educational practice.

Read more

7/25/2024

A University Framework for the Responsible use of Generative AI in Research
Total Score

0

A University Framework for the Responsible use of Generative AI in Research

Shannon Smith, Melissa Tate, Keri Freeman, Anne Walsh, Brian Ballsun-Stanton, Mark Hooper, Murray Lane

Generative Artificial Intelligence (generative AI) poses both opportunities and risks for the integrity of research. Universities must guide researchers in using generative AI responsibly, and in navigating a complex regulatory landscape subject to rapid change. By drawing on the experiences of two Australian universities, we propose a framework to help institutions promote and facilitate the responsible use of generative AI. We provide guidance to help distil the diverse regulatory environment into a principles-based position statement. Further, we explain how a position statement can then serve as a foundation for initiatives in training, communications, infrastructure, and process change. Despite the growing body of literature about AI's impact on academic integrity for undergraduate students, there has been comparatively little attention on the impacts of generative AI for research integrity, and the vital role of institutions in helping to address those challenges. This paper underscores the urgency for research institutions to take action in this area and suggests a practical and adaptable framework for so doing.

Read more

5/1/2024

🔍

Total Score

0

Artificial Intelligence in Everyday Life 2.0: Educating University Students from Different Majors

Maria Kasinidou (Open University of Cyprus), Styliani Kleanthous (CYENS Centre of Excellence, Open University of Cyprus), Matteo Busso (University of Trento), Marcelo Rodas (University of Trento, Fondazione Bruno Kessler), Jahna Otterbacher (Open University of Cyprus, CYENS Centre of Excellence), Fausto Giunchiglia (University of Trento)

With the surge in data-centric AI and its increasing capabilities, AI applications have become a part of our everyday lives. However, misunderstandings regarding their capabilities, limitations, and associated advantages and disadvantages are widespread. Consequently, in the university setting, there is a crucial need to educate not only computer science majors but also students from various disciplines about AI. In this experience report, we present an overview of an introductory course that we offered to students coming from different majors. Moreover, we discuss the assignments and quizzes of the course, which provided students with a firsthand experience of AI processes and insights into their learning patterns. Additionally, we provide a summary of the course evaluation, as well as students' performance. Finally, we present insights gained from teaching this course and elaborate on our future plans.

Read more

6/19/2024