A Comprehensive Survey of Bias in LLMs: Current Landscape and Future Directions
0
✨
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced natural language processing (NLP) capabilities.
- However, there are growing concerns about biases embedded within these models.
- This paper presents a comprehensive survey on biases in LLMs, exploring their types, sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies.
- The survey aims to provide a foundational resource for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to address and understand biases in LLMs.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models are powerful AI systems that can generate, translate, and understand human language with unprecedented accuracy. These models have revolutionized many applications, from chatbots to clinical decision support systems. However, as these models become more widely used, researchers have discovered that they can also reflect and amplify biases present in the data they were trained on.
This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the different types of biases found in LLMs, where these biases come from, and how they can impact real-world applications. The researchers categorize these biases into several key dimensions, such as gender, race, and socioeconomic status.
The paper also examines various techniques that have been developed to mitigate these biases and make LLMs more fair and equitable. Additionally, the researchers identify areas for future research to further enhance the fairness and inclusiveness of these powerful language models.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive survey of biases in large language models (LLMs), which are AI systems that excel at generating, translating, and understanding human language. The researchers systematically categorize the different types of biases found in LLMs, including biases related to gender, race, age, and socioeconomic status.
The paper explores the sources of these biases, which can stem from the training data used to develop the models, as well as the architectural choices and algorithms employed. The researchers also examine the real-world impacts of these biases, which can lead to unfair and discriminatory outcomes when LLMs are deployed in various applications.
In addition, the paper reviews the current state of bias mitigation techniques, such as data curation, model fine-tuning, and post-processing methods. The researchers critically assess the effectiveness and limitations of these approaches, and propose future research directions to further enhance the fairness and equity of LLMs.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and insightful overview of the biases present in large language models, which is a crucial issue as these models become more widely adopted. The researchers have done an excellent job of systematically categorizing the different types of biases and exploring their sources and impacts.
One potential limitation of the paper is that it focuses primarily on biases in the context of LLMs, and does not necessarily address biases that may be present in other types of AI systems. Additionally, while the paper reviews current bias mitigation techniques, it does not provide a detailed evaluation of their effectiveness or practical implementation challenges.
Furthermore, the paper could have explored the ethical and societal implications of biases in LLMs more deeply, considering how these biases can perpetuate and amplify existing inequalities in society. This could have led to a more robust discussion of the broader responsibility of researchers, developers, and policymakers in addressing these issues.
Overall, the paper serves as an important and timely contribution to the field, providing a solid foundation for further research and development in the pursuit of more fair and equitable language models.
Conclusion
This comprehensive survey on biases in large language models (LLMs) highlights the critical importance of addressing these issues as these powerful AI systems become more widely deployed. The researchers have provided a thorough analysis of the different types of biases, their sources, and their real-world impacts.
By synthesizing current research findings and proposing future research directions, this paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers who are committed to enhancing the fairness and inclusiveness of LLMs. As these models continue to shape our interactions with technology, it is crucial that we work to mitigate biases and ensure these systems are designed and used in a way that promotes equity and justice.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
✨
0
A Comprehensive Survey of Bias in LLMs: Current Landscape and Future Directions
Rajesh Ranjan, Shailja Gupta, Surya Narayan Singh
Large Language Models(LLMs) have revolutionized various applications in natural language processing (NLP) by providing unprecedented text generation, translation, and comprehension capabilities. However, their widespread deployment has brought to light significant concerns regarding biases embedded within these models. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of biases in LLMs, aiming to provide an extensive review of the types, sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies related to these biases. We systematically categorize biases into several dimensions. Our survey synthesizes current research findings and discusses the implications of biases in real-world applications. Additionally, we critically assess existing bias mitigation techniques and propose future research directions to enhance fairness and equity in LLMs. This survey serves as a foundational resource for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers concerned with addressing and understanding biases in LLMs.
Read more9/26/2024
💬
0
Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey
Isabel O. Gallegos, Ryan A. Rossi, Joe Barrow, Md Mehrab Tanjim, Sungchul Kim, Franck Dernoncourt, Tong Yu, Ruiyi Zhang, Nesreen K. Ahmed
Rapid advancements of large language models (LLMs) have enabled the processing, understanding, and generation of human-like text, with increasing integration into systems that touch our social sphere. Despite this success, these models can learn, perpetuate, and amplify harmful social biases. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of bias evaluation and mitigation techniques for LLMs. We first consolidate, formalize, and expand notions of social bias and fairness in natural language processing, defining distinct facets of harm and introducing several desiderata to operationalize fairness for LLMs. We then unify the literature by proposing three intuitive taxonomies, two for bias evaluation, namely metrics and datasets, and one for mitigation. Our first taxonomy of metrics for bias evaluation disambiguates the relationship between metrics and evaluation datasets, and organizes metrics by the different levels at which they operate in a model: embeddings, probabilities, and generated text. Our second taxonomy of datasets for bias evaluation categorizes datasets by their structure as counterfactual inputs or prompts, and identifies the targeted harms and social groups; we also release a consolidation of publicly-available datasets for improved access. Our third taxonomy of techniques for bias mitigation classifies methods by their intervention during pre-processing, in-training, intra-processing, and post-processing, with granular subcategories that elucidate research trends. Finally, we identify open problems and challenges for future work. Synthesizing a wide range of recent research, we aim to provide a clear guide of the existing literature that empowers researchers and practitioners to better understand and prevent the propagation of bias in LLMs.
Read more7/16/2024
🌀
0
Bias patterns in the application of LLMs for clinical decision support: A comprehensive study
Raphael Poulain, Hamed Fayyaz, Rahmatollah Beheshti
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful candidates to inform clinical decision-making processes. While these models play an increasingly prominent role in shaping the digital landscape, two growing concerns emerge in healthcare applications: 1) to what extent do LLMs exhibit social bias based on patients' protected attributes (like race), and 2) how do design choices (like architecture design and prompting strategies) influence the observed biases? To answer these questions rigorously, we evaluated eight popular LLMs across three question-answering (QA) datasets using clinical vignettes (patient descriptions) standardized for bias evaluations. We employ red-teaming strategies to analyze how demographics affect LLM outputs, comparing both general-purpose and clinically-trained models. Our extensive experiments reveal various disparities (some significant) across protected groups. We also observe several counter-intuitive patterns such as larger models not being necessarily less biased and fined-tuned models on medical data not being necessarily better than the general-purpose models. Furthermore, our study demonstrates the impact of prompt design on bias patterns and shows that specific phrasing can influence bias patterns and reflection-type approaches (like Chain of Thought) can reduce biased outcomes effectively. Consistent with prior studies, we call on additional evaluations, scrutiny, and enhancement of LLMs used in clinical decision support applications.
Read more4/24/2024
💬
0
Fairness in Large Language Models: A Taxonomic Survey
Zhibo Chu, Zichong Wang, Wenbin Zhang
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success across various domains. However, despite their promising performance in numerous real-world applications, most of these algorithms lack fairness considerations. Consequently, they may lead to discriminatory outcomes against certain communities, particularly marginalized populations, prompting extensive study in fair LLMs. On the other hand, fairness in LLMs, in contrast to fairness in traditional machine learning, entails exclusive backgrounds, taxonomies, and fulfillment techniques. To this end, this survey presents a comprehensive overview of recent advances in the existing literature concerning fair LLMs. Specifically, a brief introduction to LLMs is provided, followed by an analysis of factors contributing to bias in LLMs. Additionally, the concept of fairness in LLMs is discussed categorically, summarizing metrics for evaluating bias in LLMs and existing algorithms for promoting fairness. Furthermore, resources for evaluating bias in LLMs, including toolkits and datasets, are summarized. Finally, existing research challenges and open questions are discussed.
Read more4/3/2024