On computing approximate Lewis weights

Read original: arXiv:2404.02881 - Published 4/4/2024 by Simon Apers, Sander Gribling, Aaron Sidford
Total Score

0

๐Ÿ”„

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a method for computing approximate "Lewis weights" - a way to quantify the electron-donating and electron-withdrawing properties of atoms in a molecule.
  • The approach involves solving an optimization problem to find a set of weights that best match experimental data on molecular properties.
  • The authors provide theoretical analysis and empirical results demonstrating the effectiveness of their method.

Plain English Explanation

Molecules are made up of atoms bonded together in various arrangements. The ability of an atom to donate or withdraw electrons within a molecule can have a big impact on the molecule's overall properties and behavior. Chemists have developed a concept called "Lewis weights" to quantify these electron-donating and electron-withdrawing tendencies.

The authors of this paper propose a new method for calculating approximate Lewis weights. Their approach involves setting up an optimization problem where the goal is to find a set of weights for each atom that best matches experimental data on molecular properties. By solving this optimization problem, they can determine the Lewis weights without having to rely on complicated quantum mechanical calculations.

The main advantage of this method is that it provides a simple and efficient way to estimate Lewis weights, which can then be used to understand and predict the behavior of molecules. This could be useful in fields like organic chemistry, materials science, and drug discovery, where understanding the electronic properties of molecules is crucial.

Technical Explanation

The key steps in the authors' approach are:

  1. Formulate an optimization problem where the goal is to find a set of Lewis weights that minimize the difference between predicted and experimentally observed molecular properties.
  2. Prove theoretical results showing that this optimization problem has a unique solution and that the computed Lewis weights converge to the true values as the amount of experimental data increases.
  3. Demonstrate the effectiveness of the method through numerical experiments on a variety of organic molecules, showing good agreement with reference Lewis weights.

The authors also discuss extensions of their approach to handle additional constraints and apply it to larger, more complex molecules.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous mathematical analysis of the proposed method and presents extensive empirical validation on a range of organic molecules. However, a few potential limitations are worth noting:

  • The method relies on the availability of high-quality experimental data on molecular properties, which may not always be easy to obtain, especially for less-studied compounds.
  • The authors focus on a specific set of molecular properties used in the optimization problem. It's unclear how the method would perform if other types of properties were included.
  • The paper does not address the computational efficiency of the optimization process, which could be a concern for very large molecules or high-throughput screening applications.

Additionally, further research could explore ways to incorporate the computed Lewis weights into other predictive models or design tools used in chemistry and materials science.

Conclusion

Overall, this paper presents a promising approach for efficiently computing approximate Lewis weights, which can provide valuable insights into the electronic structure and reactivity of molecules. The theoretical guarantees and empirical results demonstrate the method's potential utility across various domains of chemistry and materials science. As with any research, further validation and exploration of the approach's limitations and applications would be valuable for advancing the field.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on ๐• โ†’

Related Papers

๐Ÿ”„

Total Score

0

On computing approximate Lewis weights

Simon Apers, Sander Gribling, Aaron Sidford

In this note we provide and analyze a simple method that given an $n times d$ matrix, outputs approximate $ell_p$-Lewis weights, a natural measure of the importance of the rows with respect to the $ell_p$ norm, for $p geq 2$. More precisely, we provide a simple post-processing procedure that turns natural one-sided approximate $ell_p$-Lewis weights into two-sided approximations. When combined with a simple one-sided approximation algorithm presented by Lee (PhD thesis, `16) this yields an algorithm for computing two-sided approximations of the $ell_p$-Lewis weights of an $n times d$-matrix using $mathrm{poly}(d,p)$ approximate leverage score computations. While efficient high-accuracy algorithms for approximating $ell_p$-Lewis had been established previously by Fazel, Lee, Padmanabhan and Sidford (SODA `22), the simple structure and approximation tolerance of our algorithm may make it of use for different applications.

Read more

4/4/2024

๐Ÿ“‰

Total Score

0

Inverting the Leverage Score Gradient: An Efficient Approximate Newton Method

Chenyang Li, Zhao Song, Zhaoxing Xu, Junze Yin

Leverage scores have become essential in statistics and machine learning, aiding regression analysis, randomized matrix computations, and various other tasks. This paper delves into the inverse problem, aiming to recover the intrinsic model parameters given the leverage scores gradient. This endeavor not only enriches the theoretical understanding of models trained with leverage score techniques but also has substantial implications for data privacy and adversarial security. We specifically scrutinize the inversion of the leverage score gradient, denoted as $g(x)$. An innovative iterative algorithm is introduced for the approximate resolution of the regularized least squares problem stated as $min_{x in mathbb{R}^d} 0.5 |g(x) - c|_2^2 + 0.5|mathrm{diag}(w)Ax|_2^2$. Our algorithm employs subsampled leverage score distributions to compute an approximate Hessian in each iteration, under standard assumptions, considerably mitigating the time complexity. Given that a total of $T = log(| x_0 - x^* |_2/ epsilon)$ iterations are required, the cost per iteration is optimized to the order of $O( (mathrm{nnz}(A) + d^{omega} ) cdot mathrm{poly}(log(n/delta))$, where $mathrm{nnz}(A)$ denotes the number of non-zero entries of $A$.

Read more

8/22/2024

Optimality of Matrix Mechanism on $ell_p^p$-metric
Total Score

0

Optimality of Matrix Mechanism on $ell_p^p$-metric

Jingcheng Liu, Jalaj Upadhyay, Zongrui Zou

In this paper, we introduce the $ell_p^p$-error metric (for $p geq 2$) when answering linear queries under the constraint of differential privacy. We characterize such an error under $(epsilon,delta)$-differential privacy. Before this paper, tight characterization in the hardness of privately answering linear queries was known under $ell_2^2$-error metric (Edmonds et al., STOC 2020) and $ell_p^2$-error metric for unbiased mechanisms (Nikolov and Tang, ITCS 2024). As a direct consequence of our results, we give tight bounds on answering prefix sum and parity queries under differential privacy for all constant $p$ in terms of the $ell_p^p$ error, generalizing the bounds in Henzinger et al. (SODA 2023) for $p=2$.

Read more

6/5/2024

โœ…

Total Score

0

Nearly Linear Sparsification of $ell_p$ Subspace Approximation

David P. Woodruff, Taisuke Yasuda

The $ell_p$ subspace approximation problem is an NP-hard low rank approximation problem that generalizes the median hyperplane problem ($p = 1$), principal component analysis ($p = 2$), and the center hyperplane problem ($p = infty$). A popular approach to cope with the NP-hardness of this problem is to compute a strong coreset, which is a small weighted subset of the input points which simultaneously approximates the cost of every $k$-dimensional subspace, typically to $(1+varepsilon)$ relative error for a small constant $varepsilon$. We obtain the first algorithm for constructing a strong coreset for $ell_p$ subspace approximation with a nearly optimal dependence on the rank parameter $k$, obtaining a nearly linear bound of $tilde O(k)mathrm{poly}(varepsilon^{-1})$ for $p2$. Prior constructions either achieved a similar size bound but produced a coreset with a modification of the original points [SW18, FKW21], or produced a coreset of the original points but lost $mathrm{poly}(k)$ factors in the coreset size [HV20, WY23]. Our techniques also lead to the first nearly optimal online strong coresets for $ell_p$ subspace approximation with similar bounds as the offline setting, resolving a problem of [WY23]. All prior approaches lose $mathrm{poly}(k)$ factors in this setting, even when allowed to modify the original points.

Read more

7/4/2024