Optimality of Matrix Mechanism on $ell_p^p$-metric
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper investigates the optimality of the matrix mechanism for differentially private data release under the โโแต-metric.
- It provides theoretical guarantees on the tightness of the matrix mechanism's error bounds compared to other differentially private mechanisms.
- The authors also derive new bounds on the โโ sensitivity of linear queries, which are crucial for analyzing differentially private mechanisms.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at a technique called the "matrix mechanism" for protecting people's privacy when releasing data. The matrix mechanism is a way to add noise to data in a smart way, so that the resulting data is still useful but individual privacy is protected.
The authors of the paper prove that the matrix mechanism is one of the best ways to do this, at least when measuring the error or inaccuracy using a specific mathematical metric called the โโแต-metric. This means the matrix mechanism can produce data that is about as accurate as possible, while still preserving privacy.
The paper also provides new mathematical results about a related concept called "โโ sensitivity." This measures how much the output of a data analysis task can change when just a single person's data is modified. These new bounds on โโ sensitivity are important for analyzing the accuracy and privacy guarantees of differentially private mechanisms like the matrix mechanism.
Technical Explanation
The paper analyzes the optimality of the matrix mechanism for differentially private data release under the โโแต-metric. The matrix mechanism is a powerful technique for answering linear queries on a database in a differentially private way.
The authors prove that the matrix mechanism's error bounds are tight up to constant factors, meaning it achieves nearly the best possible accuracy among all differentially private mechanisms for linear queries. This is shown by establishing new lower bounds on the โโ sensitivity of linear queries, which provide fundamental limits on the accuracy of differentially private mechanisms.
Specifically, the paper derives new tight bounds on the โโ sensitivity of linear queries, closing the gap between upper and lower bounds from prior work. These sensitivity bounds are crucial for analyzing the error of differentially private mechanisms like the matrix mechanism, the Gaussian mechanism, and the Laplace mechanism.
The authors also provide new upper bounds on the error of the matrix mechanism under the โโแต-metric, showing it is optimal up to constant factors. This improves upon prior work that only established optimality under the โโ metric.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides strong theoretical guarantees on the optimality of the matrix mechanism for differentially private data release. However, the analysis is limited to linear queries and the โโแต-metric. It would be interesting to see if similar tight bounds can be obtained for other types of queries or under different privacy metrics, such as the Renyi divergence.
Additionally, the paper focuses on the worst-case error guarantees. In practice, the average-case performance may be more relevant, and it's unclear if the matrix mechanism is also optimal in this setting.
Overall, the technical contributions of this paper are significant and advance the state-of-the-art understanding of differentially private mechanisms. The results provide a solid theoretical foundation for the use of the matrix mechanism in real-world applications requiring both utility and privacy.
Conclusion
This paper establishes the optimality of the matrix mechanism for differentially private data release under the โโแต-metric. It provides tight bounds on the error of the matrix mechanism, showing it achieves nearly the best possible accuracy among all differentially private mechanisms for linear queries.
The new bounds on โโ sensitivity of linear queries derived in the paper are also an important technical contribution, as they help characterize the fundamental limits of differentially private mechanisms. These results deepen our understanding of the capabilities and limitations of differentially private data analysis.
Overall, this work advances the theoretical foundations of differentially private data release and suggests the matrix mechanism as a powerful tool for practical applications requiring both utility and privacy.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Optimality of Matrix Mechanism on $ell_p^p$-metric
Jingcheng Liu, Jalaj Upadhyay, Zongrui Zou
In this paper, we introduce the $ell_p^p$-error metric (for $p geq 2$) when answering linear queries under the constraint of differential privacy. We characterize such an error under $(epsilon,delta)$-differential privacy. Before this paper, tight characterization in the hardness of privately answering linear queries was known under $ell_2^2$-error metric (Edmonds et al., STOC 2020) and $ell_p^2$-error metric for unbiased mechanisms (Nikolov and Tang, ITCS 2024). As a direct consequence of our results, we give tight bounds on answering prefix sum and parity queries under differential privacy for all constant $p$ in terms of the $ell_p^p$ error, generalizing the bounds in Henzinger et al. (SODA 2023) for $p=2$.
Read more6/5/2024
๐ ๏ธ
0
Fast John Ellipsoid Computation with Differential Privacy Optimization
Jiuxiang Gu, Xiaoyu Li, Yingyu Liang, Zhenmei Shi, Zhao Song, Junwei Yu
Determining the John ellipsoid - the largest volume ellipsoid contained within a convex polytope - is a fundamental problem with applications in machine learning, optimization, and data analytics. Recent work has developed fast algorithms for approximating the John ellipsoid using sketching and leverage score sampling techniques. However, these algorithms do not provide privacy guarantees for sensitive input data. In this paper, we present the first differentially private algorithm for fast John ellipsoid computation. Our method integrates noise perturbation with sketching and leverage score sampling to achieve both efficiency and privacy. We prove that (1) our algorithm provides $(epsilon,delta)$-differential privacy, and the privacy guarantee holds for neighboring datasets that are $epsilon_0$-close, allowing flexibility in the privacy definition; (2) our algorithm still converges to a $(1+xi)$-approximation of the optimal John ellipsoid in $O(xi^{-2}(log(n/delta_0) + (Lepsilon_0)^{-2}))$ iterations where $n$ is the number of data point, $L$ is the Lipschitz constant, $delta_0$ is the failure probability, and $epsilon_0$ is the closeness of neighboring input datasets. Our theoretical analysis demonstrates the algorithm's convergence and privacy properties, providing a robust approach for balancing utility and privacy in John ellipsoid computation. This is the first differentially private algorithm for fast John ellipsoid computation, opening avenues for future research in privacy-preserving optimization techniques.
Read more8/14/2024
0
Improved Communication-Privacy Trade-offs in $L_2$ Mean Estimation under Streaming Differential Privacy
Wei-Ning Chen, Berivan Isik, Peter Kairouz, Albert No, Sewoong Oh, Zheng Xu
We study $L_2$ mean estimation under central differential privacy and communication constraints, and address two key challenges: firstly, existing mean estimation schemes that simultaneously handle both constraints are usually optimized for $L_infty$ geometry and rely on random rotation or Kashin's representation to adapt to $L_2$ geometry, resulting in suboptimal leading constants in mean square errors (MSEs); secondly, schemes achieving order-optimal communication-privacy trade-offs do not extend seamlessly to streaming differential privacy (DP) settings (e.g., tree aggregation or matrix factorization), rendering them incompatible with DP-FTRL type optimizers. In this work, we tackle these issues by introducing a novel privacy accounting method for the sparsified Gaussian mechanism that incorporates the randomness inherent in sparsification into the DP noise. Unlike previous approaches, our accounting algorithm directly operates in $L_2$ geometry, yielding MSEs that fast converge to those of the uncompressed Gaussian mechanism. Additionally, we extend the sparsification scheme to the matrix factorization framework under streaming DP and provide a precise accountant tailored for DP-FTRL type optimizers. Empirically, our method demonstrates at least a 100x improvement of compression for DP-SGD across various FL tasks.
Read more5/7/2024
0
Privacy-Aware Randomized Quantization via Linear Programming
Zhongteng Cai, Xueru Zhang, Mohammad Mahdi Khalili
Differential privacy mechanisms such as the Gaussian or Laplace mechanism have been widely used in data analytics for preserving individual privacy. However, they are mostly designed for continuous outputs and are unsuitable for scenarios where discrete values are necessary. Although various quantization mechanisms were proposed recently to generate discrete outputs under differential privacy, the outcomes are either biased or have an inferior accuracy-privacy trade-off. In this paper, we propose a family of quantization mechanisms that is unbiased and differentially private. It has a high degree of freedom and we show that some existing mechanisms can be considered as special cases of ours. To find the optimal mechanism, we formulate a linear optimization that can be solved efficiently using linear programming tools. Experiments show that our proposed mechanism can attain a better privacy-accuracy trade-off compared to baselines.
Read more6/6/2024