Inverting the Leverage Score Gradient: An Efficient Approximate Newton Method

Read original: arXiv:2408.11267 - Published 8/22/2024 by Chenyang Li, Zhao Song, Zhaoxing Xu, Junze Yin
Total Score

0

📉

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Leverage scores have become crucial in statistics and machine learning for tasks like regression analysis and randomized matrix computations.
  • This paper focuses on the inverse problem of recovering the intrinsic model parameters from the leverage score gradient.
  • This research provides theoretical insights and has implications for data privacy and adversarial security.

Plain English Explanation

Leverage scores are a way of measuring the influence or importance of each data point in a machine learning model. They have become an essential tool in statistics and machine learning, helping with tasks like regression analysis and randomized matrix computations.

This paper looks at the inverse problem - can we figure out the original model parameters if we're only given the leverage score gradient? Solving this problem doesn't just deepen our theoretical understanding of models that use leverage scores, but it also has important implications for data privacy and adversarial security.

The key focus is on inverting the leverage score gradient, denoted as g(x). The paper introduces a new algorithm that can approximately solve this problem efficiently, using techniques like subsampled leverage score distributions to compute an approximate Hessian. This approach helps keep the computational cost manageable.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the inverse problem of recovering the intrinsic model parameters given the leverage score gradient. This endeavor not only enriches the theoretical understanding of models trained with leverage score techniques but also has substantial implications for data privacy and adversarial security.

Specifically, the authors scrutinize the inversion of the leverage score gradient, denoted as g(x). They introduce an innovative iterative algorithm for the approximate resolution of the regularized least squares problem stated as:

min_{x in mathbb{R}^d} 0.5 |g(x) - c|_2^2 + 0.5|mathrm{diag}(w)Ax|_2^2

The algorithm employs subsampled leverage score distributions to compute an approximate Hessian in each iteration, under standard assumptions. This approach considerably mitigates the time complexity, with the cost per iteration optimized to the order of O( (mathrm{nnz}(A) + d^{omega} ) cdot mathrm{poly}(log(n/delta)), where mathrm{nnz}(A) denotes the number of non-zero entries of A.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and efficient algorithm for inverting the leverage score gradient, which has important theoretical and practical implications. However, the authors acknowledge certain caveats and limitations of their approach.

One potential concern is the reliance on standard assumptions, such as the availability of subsampled leverage score distributions. In real-world scenarios, these assumptions may not always hold, and the algorithm's performance may be affected.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential downsides or misuse of the proposed technique, particularly with regards to data privacy and adversarial security. Further research may be needed to fully understand the implications and mitigate any unintended consequences.

Conclusion

This paper makes a significant contribution to the field of leverage score analysis by introducing a new algorithm for inverting the leverage score gradient. The findings not only deepen our theoretical understanding of models trained with leverage score techniques but also have important implications for data privacy and adversarial security.

The efficient and approximate nature of the algorithm suggests that it could be a valuable tool for various machine learning and statistical applications. However, the potential limitations and unintended consequences of this approach warrant further investigation and discussion within the research community.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📉

Total Score

0

Inverting the Leverage Score Gradient: An Efficient Approximate Newton Method

Chenyang Li, Zhao Song, Zhaoxing Xu, Junze Yin

Leverage scores have become essential in statistics and machine learning, aiding regression analysis, randomized matrix computations, and various other tasks. This paper delves into the inverse problem, aiming to recover the intrinsic model parameters given the leverage scores gradient. This endeavor not only enriches the theoretical understanding of models trained with leverage score techniques but also has substantial implications for data privacy and adversarial security. We specifically scrutinize the inversion of the leverage score gradient, denoted as $g(x)$. An innovative iterative algorithm is introduced for the approximate resolution of the regularized least squares problem stated as $min_{x in mathbb{R}^d} 0.5 |g(x) - c|_2^2 + 0.5|mathrm{diag}(w)Ax|_2^2$. Our algorithm employs subsampled leverage score distributions to compute an approximate Hessian in each iteration, under standard assumptions, considerably mitigating the time complexity. Given that a total of $T = log(| x_0 - x^* |_2/ epsilon)$ iterations are required, the cost per iteration is optimized to the order of $O( (mathrm{nnz}(A) + d^{omega} ) cdot mathrm{poly}(log(n/delta))$, where $mathrm{nnz}(A)$ denotes the number of non-zero entries of $A$.

Read more

8/22/2024

🔄

Total Score

0

How to Inverting the Leverage Score Distribution?

Zhihang Li, Zhao Song, Weixin Wang, Junze Yin, Zheng Yu

Leverage score is a fundamental problem in machine learning and theoretical computer science. It has extensive applications in regression analysis, randomized algorithms, and neural network inversion. Despite leverage scores are widely used as a tool, in this paper, we study a novel problem, namely the inverting leverage score problem. We analyze to invert the leverage score distributions back to recover model parameters. Specifically, given a leverage score $sigma in mathbb{R}^n$, the matrix $A in mathbb{R}^{n times d}$, and the vector $b in mathbb{R}^n$, we analyze the non-convex optimization problem of finding $x in mathbb{R}^d$ to minimize $| mathrm{diag}( sigma ) - I_n circ (A(x) (A(x)^top A(x) )^{-1} A(x)^top ) |_F$, where $A(x):= S(x)^{-1} A in mathbb{R}^{n times d} $, $S(x) := mathrm{diag}(s(x)) in mathbb{R}^{n times n}$ and $s(x) : = Ax - b in mathbb{R}^n$. Our theoretical studies include computing the gradient and Hessian, demonstrating that the Hessian matrix is positive definite and Lipschitz, and constructing first-order and second-order algorithms to solve this regression problem. Our work combines iterative shrinking and the induction hypothesis to ensure global convergence rates for the Newton method, as well as the properties of Lipschitz and strong convexity to guarantee the performance of gradient descent. This important study on inverting statistical leverage opens up numerous new applications in interpretation, data recovery, and security.

Read more

4/23/2024

Revisit, Extend, and Enhance Hessian-Free Influence Functions
Total Score

0

Revisit, Extend, and Enhance Hessian-Free Influence Functions

Ziao Yang, Han Yue, Jian Chen, Hongfu Liu

Influence functions serve as crucial tools for assessing sample influence in model interpretation, subset training set selection, noisy label detection, and more. By employing the first-order Taylor extension, influence functions can estimate sample influence without the need for expensive model retraining. However, applying influence functions directly to deep models presents challenges, primarily due to the non-convex nature of the loss function and the large size of model parameters. This difficulty not only makes computing the inverse of the Hessian matrix costly but also renders it non-existent in some cases. Various approaches, including matrix decomposition, have been explored to expedite and approximate the inversion of the Hessian matrix, with the aim of making influence functions applicable to deep models. In this paper, we revisit a specific, albeit naive, yet effective approximation method known as TracIn. This method substitutes the inverse of the Hessian matrix with an identity matrix. We provide deeper insights into why this simple approximation method performs well. Furthermore, we extend its applications beyond measuring model utility to include considerations of fairness and robustness. Finally, we enhance TracIn through an ensemble strategy. To validate its effectiveness, we conduct experiments on synthetic data and extensive evaluations on noisy label detection, sample selection for large language model fine-tuning, and defense against adversarial attacks.

Read more

5/29/2024

Inverse-Free Fast Natural Gradient Descent Method for Deep Learning
Total Score

0

Inverse-Free Fast Natural Gradient Descent Method for Deep Learning

Xinwei Ou, Ce Zhu, Xiaolin Huang, Yipeng Liu

Second-order optimization techniques have the potential to achieve faster convergence rates compared to first-order methods through the incorporation of second-order derivatives or statistics. However, their utilization in deep learning is limited due to their computational inefficiency. Various approaches have been proposed to address this issue, primarily centered on minimizing the size of the matrix to be inverted. Nevertheless, the necessity of performing the inverse operation iteratively persists. In this work, we present a fast natural gradient descent (FNGD) method that only requires inversion during the first epoch. Specifically, it is revealed that natural gradient descent (NGD) is essentially a weighted sum of per-sample gradients. Our novel approach further proposes to share these weighted coefficients across epochs without affecting empirical performance. Consequently, FNGD exhibits similarities to the average sum in first-order methods, leading to the computational complexity of FNGD being comparable to that of first-order methods. Extensive experiments on image classification and machine translation tasks demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed FNGD. For training ResNet-18 on CIFAR-100, FNGD can achieve a speedup of 2.07$times$ compared with KFAC. For training Transformer on Multi30K, FNGD outperforms AdamW by 24 BLEU score while requiring almost the same training time.

Read more

4/30/2024