Computing Inductive Invariants of Regular Abstraction Frameworks

Read original: arXiv:2404.10752 - Published 7/22/2024 by Philipp Czerner, Javier Esparza, Valentin Krasotin, Christoph Welzel-Mohr
Total Score

0

📉

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Introduction

The paper "Computing Inductive Invariants of Regular Abstraction Frameworks" explores a method for automatically deriving inductive invariants in the context of regular transition systems. Inductive invariants are properties that hold true for all reachable states in a system, and they are crucial for verifying the correctness of a system's behavior.

Preliminaries and Regular Transition Systems

Regular Transition Systems

Regular transition systems are a formalism used to model systems with infinite or unbounded state spaces. They represent states as words over a finite alphabet, and transitions between states as regular relations over these words. This allows for the analysis of systems with complex, potentially infinite state spaces.

Computing Inductive Invariants

The paper presents a technique for automatically computing inductive invariants of regular transition systems. This involves two key steps:

  1. Regular Abstraction: The system is abstracted into a regular transition system, which captures the essential dynamics of the original system while simplifying the state space.
  2. Inductive Invariant Synthesis: An algorithm is used to synthesize an inductive invariant that holds for all reachable states in the regular transition system. This invariant can then be used to verify the correctness of the original system.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through several case studies, including verifying properties of cache coherence protocols and distributed algorithms.

Technical Explanation

The paper formalizes the concept of regular transition systems and introduces a novel algorithm for computing inductive invariants over these systems. The algorithm works by iteratively refining an initial overapproximation of the reachable states until an inductive invariant is found.

The key technical contributions include:

  1. Regular Transition Systems: The authors define regular transition systems as a way to model systems with infinite or unbounded state spaces, using regular languages and relations to represent states and transitions.
  2. Inductive Invariant Synthesis: The paper presents an algorithm that leverages regular language operations to synthesize inductive invariants for regular transition systems. This algorithm is shown to be sound and complete.
  3. Case Studies: The authors demonstrate the practical applicability of their approach by verifying properties of several systems, including cache coherence protocols and distributed algorithms.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and theoretically sound approach for computing inductive invariants of regular transition systems. The authors' use of regular languages and relations to model systems with infinite state spaces is a powerful abstraction that allows for the automated verification of complex systems.

However, the paper does not address the potential scalability issues that may arise when applying this technique to large or complex systems. The computational complexity of the invariant synthesis algorithm may limit its practical applicability in some scenarios.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss the limitations of the regular abstraction framework or the potential sources of imprecision that may arise when approximating the system's behavior using regular languages. Further research may be needed to understand the extent to which this approach can be applied to a wider range of systems.

Conclusion

The "Computing Inductive Invariants of Regular Abstraction Frameworks" paper introduces a novel technique for automatically verifying the correctness of systems with infinite or unbounded state spaces. By leveraging the power of regular languages and relations, the authors have developed a method for synthesizing inductive invariants that can be used to prove the safety of complex systems.

This work represents an important step forward in the field of formal verification, as it provides a systematic way to analyze systems that are beyond the reach of traditional model checking techniques. The authors' case studies demonstrate the practical applicability of their approach, and future research may further extend the capabilities of this framework to address scalability and precision challenges.

Overall, this paper contributes a valuable tool for ensuring the reliability and correctness of a wide range of systems, from cache coherence protocols to distributed algorithms, with significant implications for the development of secure and dependable software.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📉

Total Score

0

Computing Inductive Invariants of Regular Abstraction Frameworks

Philipp Czerner, Javier Esparza, Valentin Krasotin, Christoph Welzel-Mohr

Regular transition systems (RTS) are a popular formalism for modeling infinite-state systems in general, and parameterised systems in particular. In a CONCUR 22 paper, Esparza et al. introduce a novel approach to the verification of RTS, based on inductive invariants. The approach computes the intersection of all inductive invariants of a given RTS that can be expressed as CNF formulas with a bounded number of clauses, and uses it to construct an automaton recognising an overapproximation of the reachable configurations. The paper shows that the problem of deciding if the language of this automaton intersects a given regular set of unsafe configurations is in $textsf{EXPSPACE}$ and $textsf{PSPACE}$-hard. We introduce $textit{regular abstraction frameworks}$, a generalisation of the approach of Esparza et al., very similar to the regular abstractions of Hong and Lin. A framework consists of a regular language of $textit{constraints}$, and a transducer, called the $textit{interpretation}$, that assigns to each constraint the set of configurations of the RTS satisfying it. Examples of regular abstraction frameworks include the formulas of Esparza et al., octagons, bounded difference matrices, and views. We show that the generalisation of the decision problem above to regular abstraction frameworks remains in $textsf{EXPSPACE}$, and prove a matching (non-trivial) $textsf{EXPSPACE}$-hardness bound. $textsf{EXPSPACE}$-hardness implies that, in the worst case, the automaton recognising the overapproximation of the reachable configurations has a double-exponential number of states. We introduce a learning algorithm that computes this automaton in a lazy manner, stopping whenever the current hypothesis is already strong enough to prove safety. We report on an implementation and show that our experimental results improve on those of Esparza et al.

Read more

7/22/2024

📈

Total Score

0

Regular Model Checking Upside-Down: An Invariant-Based Approach

Javier Esparza, Mikhail Raskin, Christoph Welzel-Mohr

Regular model checking is a well-established technique for the verification of infinite-state systems whose configurations can be represented as finite words over a suitable alphabet. It applies to systems whose set of initial configurations is regular, and whose transition relation is captured by a length-preserving transducer. To verify safety properties, regular model checking iteratively computes automata recognizing increasingly larger regular sets of reachable configurations, and checks if they contain unsafe configurations. Since this procedure often does not terminate, acceleration, abstraction, and widening techniques have been developed to compute a regular superset of the set of reachable configurations. In this paper we develop a complementary approach. Instead of approaching the set of reachable configurations from below, we start with the set of all configurations and compute increasingly smaller regular supersets of it. We use that the set of reachable configurations is equal to the intersection of all inductive invariants of the system. Since the intersection is in general non-regular, we introduce $b$-bounded invariants, defined as those representable by CNF-formulas with at most $b$ clauses. We prove that, for every $b geq 0$, the intersection of all $b$-bounded inductive invariants is regular, and show how to construct an automaton recognizing it. We study the complexity of deciding if this automaton accepts some unsafe configuration. We show that the problem is in textsc{EXPSPACE} for every $b geq 0$, and textsc{PSPACE}-complete for $b=1$. Finally, we study how large must $b$ be to prove safety properties of a number of benchmarks.

Read more

7/31/2024

📊

Total Score

0

A HAT Trick: Automatically Verifying Representation Invariants Using Symbolic Finite Automata

Zhe Zhou, Qianchuan Ye, Benjamin Delaware, Suresh Jagannathan

Functional programs typically interact with stateful libraries that hide state behind typed abstractions. One particularly important class of applications are data structure implementations that rely on such libraries to provide a level of efficiency and scalability that may be otherwise difficult to achieve. However, because the specifications of the methods provided by these libraries are necessarily general and rarely specialized to the needs of any specific client, any required application-level invariants must often be expressed in terms of additional constraints on the (often) opaque state maintained by the library. In this paper, we consider the specification and verification of such representation invariants using symbolic finite automata (SFA). We show that SFAs can be used to succinctly and precisely capture fine-grained temporal and data-dependent histories of interactions between functional clients and stateful libraries. To facilitate modular and compositional reasoning, we integrate SFAs into a refinement type system to qualify stateful computations resulting from such interactions. The particular instantiation we consider, Hoare Automata Types (HATs), allows us to both specify and automatically type-check the representation invariants of a datatype, even when its implementation depends on stateful library methods that operate over hidden state. We also develop a new bidirectional type checking algorithm that implements an efficient subtyping inclusion check over HATs, enabling their translation into a form amenable for SMT-based automated verification. We present extensive experimental results on an implementation of this algorithm that demonstrates the feasibility of type-checking complex and sophisticated HAT-specified OCaml data structure implementations.

Read more

4/3/2024

On-the-fly Synthesis for LTL over Finite Traces: An Efficient Approach that Counts
Total Score

0

On-the-fly Synthesis for LTL over Finite Traces: An Efficient Approach that Counts

Shengping Xiao, Yongkang Li, Shufang Zhu, Jun Sun, Jianwen Li, Geguang Pu, Moshe Y. Vardi

We present an on-the-fly synthesis framework for Linear Temporal Logic over finite traces (LTLf) based on top-down deterministic automata construction. Existing approaches rely on constructing a complete Deterministic Finite Automaton (DFA) corresponding to the LTLf specification, a process with doubly exponential complexity relative to the formula size in the worst case. In this case, the synthesis procedure cannot be conducted until the entire DFA is constructed. This inefficiency is the main bottleneck of existing approaches. To address this challenge, we first present a method for converting LTLf into Transition-based DFA (TDFA) by directly leveraging LTLf semantics, incorporating intermediate results as direct components of the final automaton to enable parallelized synthesis and automata construction. We then explore the relationship between LTLf synthesis and TDFA games and subsequently develop an algorithm for performing LTLf synthesis using on-the-fly TDFA game solving. This algorithm traverses the state space in a global forward manner combined with a local backward method, along with the detection of strongly connected components. Moreover, we introduce two optimization techniques -- model-guided synthesis and state entailment -- to enhance the practical efficiency of our approach. Experimental results demonstrate that our on-the-fly approach achieves the best performance on the tested benchmarks and effectively complements existing tools and approaches.

Read more

8/15/2024