Computing Within Limits: An Empirical Study of Energy Consumption in ML Training and Inference
2406.14328
0
0
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) has seen tremendous advancements, but its environmental footprint remains a concern. Acknowledging the growing environmental impact of ML this paper investigates Green ML, examining various model architectures and hyperparameters in both training and inference phases to identify energy-efficient practices. Our study leverages software-based power measurements for ease of replication across diverse configurations, models and datasets. In this paper, we examine multiple models and hardware configurations to identify correlations across the various measurements and metrics and key contributors to energy reduction. Our analysis offers practical guidelines for constructing sustainable ML operations, emphasising energy consumption and carbon footprint reductions while maintaining performance. As identified, short-lived profiling can quantify the long-term expected energy consumption. Moreover, model parameters can also be used to accurately estimate the expected total energy without the need for extensive experimentation.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Empirical study on energy consumption in machine learning (ML) training and inference
- Aims to understand the environmental impact of ML and provide insights for improving energy efficiency
- Covers various factors that influence energy usage, such as hardware, software, and hyperparameters
Plain English Explanation
This research paper examines the energy consumption of machine learning (ML) models during both the training and inference (deployment) stages. The researchers wanted to understand the environmental impact of ML and identify ways to make it more energy-efficient.
They looked at different factors that can affect how much energy an ML model uses, including the hardware it runs on, the software and algorithms used, and the specific settings or hyperparameters chosen. By carefully measuring the energy usage in various scenarios, the researchers were able to gain insights into the drivers of energy consumption in ML.
These insights could help ML developers and researchers find ways to reduce the environmental footprint of their work, whether it's by optimizing the hardware, adjusting the software, or fine-tuning the model parameters. Ultimately, the goal is to make machine learning more sustainable and energy-efficient, which could have important implications for the growing cost and energy demands of AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a comprehensive empirical study to analyze the energy consumption of machine learning models during both the training and inference (deployment) stages. They considered various factors that can influence energy usage, including hardware (e.g., CPU, GPU, TPU), software (e.g., deep learning frameworks, optimization techniques), and hyperparameters (e.g., batch size, learning rate, model architecture).
To do this, they developed a custom measurement setup that could accurately track the power consumption of different ML systems. They then ran a series of experiments, training and evaluating various deep learning models on different hardware configurations and with varying hyperparameter settings.
Through their analysis of the experimental data, the researchers were able to identify several key drivers of energy consumption in ML. For example, they found that the choice of hardware, particularly the type of accelerator used (GPU vs. TPU), had a significant impact on energy usage. They also discovered that certain hyperparameter settings, such as batch size and learning rate, could substantially affect the energy efficiency of the training process.
The insights gained from this study could help guide the development of more energy-efficient ML systems and inform strategies for optimizing energy usage at different layers of the ML stack. This is particularly important as the growing demand for AI and machine learning continues to drive up energy costs and environmental impact.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and well-designed empirical study on the energy consumption of machine learning models, which is a valuable contribution to the field. The researchers have carefully considered various factors that can influence energy usage, and their experimental setup and analysis appear to be rigorous.
One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses primarily on deep learning models and may not fully capture the energy characteristics of other types of ML algorithms or architectures. Additionally, the paper does not delve into the energy costs associated with the data and compute requirements of large language models, which could be an important area for further research.
While the paper provides valuable insights, it would be helpful to see more discussion of the practical implications and potential solutions for improving the energy efficiency of ML systems. The researchers could also explore how their findings might apply to different application domains or real-world deployment scenarios.
Overall, this study represents an important step towards understanding and mitigating the environmental impact of machine learning. By continuing to investigate these issues, the research community can help ensure that the benefits of AI and ML are achieved in a sustainable and responsible manner.
Conclusion
This empirical study provides valuable insights into the energy consumption of machine learning models during both training and inference. The researchers have identified several key factors, including hardware, software, and hyperparameters, that can significantly impact the energy efficiency of ML systems.
The findings from this work could help guide the development of more energy-efficient ML models and frameworks, which is crucial as the demand for AI and machine learning continues to grow. By better understanding the energy footprint of ML and focusing on improving its sustainability, researchers and practitioners can work towards more environmentally responsible and cost-effective AI solutions.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Towards Greener LLMs: Bringing Energy-Efficiency to the Forefront of LLM Inference
Jovan Stojkovic, Esha Choukse, Chaojie Zhang, Inigo Goiri, Josep Torrellas
0
0
With the ubiquitous use of modern large language models (LLMs) across industries, the inference serving for these models is ever expanding. Given the high compute and memory requirements of modern LLMs, more and more top-of-the-line GPUs are being deployed to serve these models. Energy availability has come to the forefront as the biggest challenge for data center expansion to serve these models. In this paper, we present the trade-offs brought up by making energy efficiency the primary goal of LLM serving under performance SLOs. We show that depending on the inputs, the model, and the service-level agreements, there are several knobs available to the LLM inference provider to use for being energy efficient. We characterize the impact of these knobs on the latency, throughput, as well as the energy. By exploring these trade-offs, we offer valuable insights into optimizing energy usage without compromising on performance, thereby paving the way for sustainable and cost-effective LLM deployment in data center environments.
4/1/2024
🧠
Toward Cross-Layer Energy Optimizations in Machine Learning Systems
Jae-Won Chung, Mosharaf Chowdhury
0
0
The enormous energy consumption of machine learning (ML) and generative AI workloads shows no sign of waning, taking a toll on operating costs, power delivery, and environmental sustainability. Despite a long line of research on energy-efficient hardware, we found that software plays a critical role in ML energy optimization through two recent works: Zeus and Perseus. This is especially true for large language models (LLMs) because their model sizes and, therefore, energy demands are growing faster than hardware efficiency improvements. Therefore, we advocate for a cross-layer approach for energy optimizations in ML systems, where hardware provides architectural support that pushes energy-efficient software further, while software leverages and abstracts the hardware to develop techniques that bring hardware-agnostic energy-efficiency gains.
4/11/2024
The Power of Training: How Different Neural Network Setups Influence the Energy Demand
Daniel Gei{ss}ler, Bo Zhou, Mengxi Liu, Sungho Suh, Paul Lukowicz
0
0
This work offers a heuristic evaluation of the effects of variations in machine learning training regimes and learning paradigms on the energy consumption of computing, especially HPC hardware with a life-cycle aware perspective. While increasing data availability and innovation in high-performance hardware fuels the training of sophisticated models, it also fosters the fading perception of energy consumption and carbon emission. Therefore, the goal of this work is to raise awareness about the energy impact of general training parameters and processes, from learning rate over batch size to knowledge transfer. Multiple setups with different hyperparameter configurations are evaluated on three different hardware systems. Among many results, we have found out that even with the same model and hardware to reach the same accuracy, improperly set training hyperparameters consume up to 5 times the energy of the optimal setup. We also extensively examined the energy-saving benefits of learning paradigms including recycling knowledge through pretraining and sharing knowledge through multitask training.
5/9/2024
Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment?
Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Yacine Jernite, Emma Strubell
0
0
Recent years have seen a surge in the popularity of commercial AI products based on generative, multi-purpose AI systems promising a unified approach to building machine learning (ML) models into technology. However, this ambition of ``generality'' comes at a steep cost to the environment, given the amount of energy these systems require and the amount of carbon that they emit. In this work, we propose the first systematic comparison of the ongoing inference cost of various categories of ML systems, covering both task-specific (i.e. finetuned models that carry out a single task) and `general-purpose' models, (i.e. those trained for multiple tasks). We measure deployment cost as the amount of energy and carbon required to perform 1,000 inferences on representative benchmark dataset using these models. We find that multi-purpose, generative architectures are orders of magnitude more expensive than task-specific systems for a variety of tasks, even when controlling for the number of model parameters. We conclude with a discussion around the current trend of deploying multi-purpose generative ML systems, and caution that their utility should be more intentionally weighed against increased costs in terms of energy and emissions. All the data from our study can be accessed via an interactive demo to carry out further exploration and analysis.
5/27/2024