The Power of Training: How Different Neural Network Setups Influence the Energy Demand
2401.01851
1
0
Abstract
This work offers a heuristic evaluation of the effects of variations in machine learning training regimes and learning paradigms on the energy consumption of computing, especially HPC hardware with a life-cycle aware perspective. While increasing data availability and innovation in high-performance hardware fuels the training of sophisticated models, it also fosters the fading perception of energy consumption and carbon emission. Therefore, the goal of this work is to raise awareness about the energy impact of general training parameters and processes, from learning rate over batch size to knowledge transfer. Multiple setups with different hyperparameter configurations are evaluated on three different hardware systems. Among many results, we have found out that even with the same model and hardware to reach the same accuracy, improperly set training hyperparameters consume up to 5 times the energy of the optimal setup. We also extensively examined the energy-saving benefits of learning paradigms including recycling knowledge through pretraining and sharing knowledge through multitask training.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates how different neural network setups influence the energy demand during training.
- The researchers conducted experiments to measure the energy consumption of various neural network architectures and training configurations.
- The findings provide insights into strategies for reducing the energy footprint of machine learning models, which is an important consideration as AI systems become more prevalent.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores how the way you set up and train a neural network can affect how much energy it uses. Neural networks are a type of machine learning model that are inspired by the human brain and are very powerful at tasks like image recognition and language processing. However, training these models can be computationally intensive and use a lot of energy, which is an important consideration as AI systems become more widely used.
The researchers ran different experiments to measure the energy consumption of neural networks with various architectures and training configurations. For example, they looked at how the number of layers in the network, the type of activation functions used, and the optimization algorithms employed during training impacted the energy demand.
The results from these experiments provide valuable insights that can help machine learning researchers and engineers make their models more energy-efficient. By understanding the factors that influence energy consumption, they can design neural network setups that are better for the environment and less costly to run, especially as AI becomes more pervasive in our daily lives. [This relates to the paper "Toward Cross-Layer Energy Optimizations for Machine Learning," which explores techniques for reducing the energy usage of AI models.]
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a series of experiments to measure the energy consumption of different neural network setups during training. They tested various network architectures, activation functions, optimization algorithms, and other hyperparameters to understand how these factors influence the energy demand.
The experiment setup involved training the neural networks on a standard image classification task using the CIFAR-10 dataset. The researchers measured the total energy consumed during the training process, as well as the energy used per training iteration and per parameter update.
The results showed that the network architecture had a significant impact on energy consumption. For example, networks with more layers and parameters tended to use more energy, as did those with certain activation functions like ReLU. The choice of optimization algorithm also played a role, with some methods like SGD being more energy-efficient than others like Adam.
Additionally, the researchers found that the energy consumption scaled linearly with the number of training iterations, indicating that techniques to reduce barriers to entry for foundation model training could help lower the overall energy footprint. They also observed that the energy per parameter update remained relatively constant across different setups, suggesting that optimizing for energy-efficient machine learning at the individual component level may be an effective strategy.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the growing body of research on the energy efficiency of machine learning models. By systematically exploring how different neural network setups impact energy consumption, the authors offer insights that can inform the design of more environmentally-friendly AI systems.
However, the study is limited to a single image classification task on the CIFAR-10 dataset. It would be interesting to see if the findings hold true for a wider range of applications and datasets, including more complex and resource-intensive tasks like natural language processing or reinforcement learning. [This relates to the paper "More Compute is What You Need," which discusses the computational demands of large-scale AI models.]
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential trade-offs between energy efficiency and model performance. In some cases, architectural choices or training techniques that reduce energy consumption may also impact the accuracy or capability of the neural network. Exploring this balance would be an important next step in the research.
Finally, the study focuses exclusively on the energy usage during training, but the energy footprint of deploying and running the trained models in production environments is also an important consideration. [This relates to the paper "Data-Driven Building Energy Efficiency Prediction Using Machine Learning," which examines the energy implications of deploying machine learning models in real-world applications.]
Conclusion
This paper provides valuable insights into the factors that influence the energy consumption of neural networks during training. By understanding how architectural choices, hyperparameters, and optimization techniques impact energy demand, the research offers a roadmap for developing more energy-efficient machine learning models.
As AI systems become increasingly ubiquitous, the environmental and economic costs of their energy usage will be an important consideration. The findings from this study can help guide the design of neural networks that are better for the planet, contributing to the broader goal of building more sustainable and responsible AI technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Computing Within Limits: An Empirical Study of Energy Consumption in ML Training and Inference
Ioannis Mavromatis, Kostas Katsaros, Aftab Khan
0
0
Machine learning (ML) has seen tremendous advancements, but its environmental footprint remains a concern. Acknowledging the growing environmental impact of ML this paper investigates Green ML, examining various model architectures and hyperparameters in both training and inference phases to identify energy-efficient practices. Our study leverages software-based power measurements for ease of replication across diverse configurations, models and datasets. In this paper, we examine multiple models and hardware configurations to identify correlations across the various measurements and metrics and key contributors to energy reduction. Our analysis offers practical guidelines for constructing sustainable ML operations, emphasising energy consumption and carbon footprint reductions while maintaining performance. As identified, short-lived profiling can quantify the long-term expected energy consumption. Moreover, model parameters can also be used to accurately estimate the expected total energy without the need for extensive experimentation.
6/21/2024
Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment?
Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Yacine Jernite, Emma Strubell
0
0
Recent years have seen a surge in the popularity of commercial AI products based on generative, multi-purpose AI systems promising a unified approach to building machine learning (ML) models into technology. However, this ambition of ``generality'' comes at a steep cost to the environment, given the amount of energy these systems require and the amount of carbon that they emit. In this work, we propose the first systematic comparison of the ongoing inference cost of various categories of ML systems, covering both task-specific (i.e. finetuned models that carry out a single task) and `general-purpose' models, (i.e. those trained for multiple tasks). We measure deployment cost as the amount of energy and carbon required to perform 1,000 inferences on representative benchmark dataset using these models. We find that multi-purpose, generative architectures are orders of magnitude more expensive than task-specific systems for a variety of tasks, even when controlling for the number of model parameters. We conclude with a discussion around the current trend of deploying multi-purpose generative ML systems, and caution that their utility should be more intentionally weighed against increased costs in terms of energy and emissions. All the data from our study can be accessed via an interactive demo to carry out further exploration and analysis.
5/27/2024
🧠
Toward Cross-Layer Energy Optimizations in Machine Learning Systems
Jae-Won Chung, Mosharaf Chowdhury
0
0
The enormous energy consumption of machine learning (ML) and generative AI workloads shows no sign of waning, taking a toll on operating costs, power delivery, and environmental sustainability. Despite a long line of research on energy-efficient hardware, we found that software plays a critical role in ML energy optimization through two recent works: Zeus and Perseus. This is especially true for large language models (LLMs) because their model sizes and, therefore, energy demands are growing faster than hardware efficiency improvements. Therefore, we advocate for a cross-layer approach for energy optimizations in ML systems, where hardware provides architectural support that pushes energy-efficient software further, while software leverages and abstracts the hardware to develop techniques that bring hardware-agnostic energy-efficiency gains.
4/11/2024
Unveiling Energy Efficiency in Deep Learning: Measurement, Prediction, and Scoring across Edge Devices
Xiaolong Tu, Anik Mallik, Dawei Chen, Kyungtae Han, Onur Altintas, Haoxin Wang, Jiang Xie
0
0
Today, deep learning optimization is primarily driven by research focused on achieving high inference accuracy and reducing latency. However, the energy efficiency aspect is often overlooked, possibly due to a lack of sustainability mindset in the field and the absence of a holistic energy dataset. In this paper, we conduct a threefold study, including energy measurement, prediction, and efficiency scoring, with an objective to foster transparency in power and energy consumption within deep learning across various edge devices. Firstly, we present a detailed, first-of-its-kind measurement study that uncovers the energy consumption characteristics of on-device deep learning. This study results in the creation of three extensive energy datasets for edge devices, covering a wide range of kernels, state-of-the-art DNN models, and popular AI applications. Secondly, we design and implement the first kernel-level energy predictors for edge devices based on our kernel-level energy dataset. Evaluation results demonstrate the ability of our predictors to provide consistent and accurate energy estimations on unseen DNN models. Lastly, we introduce two scoring metrics, PCS and IECS, developed to convert complex power and energy consumption data of an edge device into an easily understandable manner for edge device end-users. We hope our work can help shift the mindset of both end-users and the research community towards sustainability in edge computing, a principle that drives our research. Find data, code, and more up-to-date information at https://amai-gsu.github.io/DeepEn2023.
6/11/2024