Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment?
2311.16863
2
0
Abstract
Recent years have seen a surge in the popularity of commercial AI products based on generative, multi-purpose AI systems promising a unified approach to building machine learning (ML) models into technology. However, this ambition of ``generality'' comes at a steep cost to the environment, given the amount of energy these systems require and the amount of carbon that they emit. In this work, we propose the first systematic comparison of the ongoing inference cost of various categories of ML systems, covering both task-specific (i.e. finetuned models that carry out a single task) and `general-purpose' models, (i.e. those trained for multiple tasks). We measure deployment cost as the amount of energy and carbon required to perform 1,000 inferences on representative benchmark dataset using these models. We find that multi-purpose, generative architectures are orders of magnitude more expensive than task-specific systems for a variety of tasks, even when controlling for the number of model parameters. We conclude with a discussion around the current trend of deploying multi-purpose generative ML systems, and caution that their utility should be more intentionally weighed against increased costs in terms of energy and emissions. All the data from our study can be accessed via an interactive demo to carry out further exploration and analysis.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the power and energy consumption of different neural network setups and their impact on the cost of AI deployment.
- The research examines techniques for improving energy efficiency in machine learning and reducing the carbon footprint of large language models.
- The study provides insights into the tradeoffs between increased compute power and energy efficiency for training and deploying AI models.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses the power and energy requirements of different machine learning models and how that affects the costs of deploying AI systems. It looks at techniques to make AI more energy-efficient and reduce the carbon footprint, especially for large language models that can consume a lot of power.
The research examines the tradeoffs between using more computing power to improve model performance versus optimizing for energy efficiency. This is an important consideration, as the energy costs of running AI systems can be a significant factor in the overall deployment costs.
The paper provides insights that can help organizations make more informed decisions about their AI infrastructure and find the right balance between performance and energy efficiency based on their specific needs and constraints.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an in-depth analysis of the power and energy consumption of various neural network architectures and training setups. The researchers conduct experiments to measure the power draw and energy usage of different model configurations, including variations in model size, hardware, and training techniques.
The study explores methods for improving the energy efficiency of machine learning systems, such as model compression, hardware acceleration, and task-specific optimizations. It also investigates approaches for reducing the carbon footprint of large language models, which can be particularly power-hungry.
The findings reveal the significant impact that power and energy consumption can have on the overall cost of deploying AI systems. The researchers analyze the tradeoffs between increased compute power and energy efficiency, providing guidance on optimizing neural network setups for power-efficient training and inference.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the power and energy implications of AI deployment, but it acknowledges some limitations. For example, the experiments were conducted in a controlled lab setting, and the results may not fully capture the real-world conditions and variability encountered in production environments.
Additionally, the study focuses primarily on the technical aspects of power and energy efficiency, but it does not delve into the broader societal and environmental impacts of AI systems. Factors such as the lifecycle carbon footprint, energy sources, and e-waste management could be further explored to provide a more holistic understanding of the sustainability challenges.
While the paper offers valuable insights, it also highlights the need for continued research and collaboration across disciplines to develop more sustainable and responsible AI practices. Ongoing efforts to optimize energy-efficient AI and reduce the environmental impact of large language models will be crucial as the adoption of AI technologies continues to grow.
Conclusion
This paper provides a detailed examination of the power and energy considerations in the deployment of AI systems. It reveals the significant impact that power consumption can have on the overall cost of AI, highlighting the importance of optimizing for energy efficiency.
The research explores various techniques for improving the power efficiency of machine learning models, including model compression, hardware acceleration, and task-specific optimizations. It also investigates strategies for reducing the carbon footprint of large language models, which are known to be power-hungry.
The findings offer valuable insights for organizations looking to deploy AI in a more sustainable and cost-effective manner. By understanding the tradeoffs between increased compute power and energy efficiency, they can make informed decisions about their AI infrastructure and find the right balance to meet their performance, cost, and environmental goals.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Beyond Efficiency: Scaling AI Sustainably
Carole-Jean Wu, Bilge Acun, Ramya Raghavendra, Kim Hazelwood
0
0
Barroso's seminal contributions in energy-proportional warehouse-scale computing launched an era where modern datacenters have become more energy efficient and cost effective than ever before. At the same time, modern AI applications have driven ever-increasing demands in computing, highlighting the importance of optimizing efficiency across the entire deep learning model development cycle. This paper characterizes the carbon impact of AI, including both operational carbon emissions from training and inference as well as embodied carbon emissions from datacenter construction and hardware manufacturing. We highlight key efficiency optimization opportunities for cutting-edge AI technologies, from deep learning recommendation models to multi-modal generative AI tasks. To scale AI sustainably, we must also go beyond efficiency and optimize across the life cycle of computing infrastructures, from hardware manufacturing to datacenter operations and end-of-life processing for the hardware.
6/26/2024
Computing Within Limits: An Empirical Study of Energy Consumption in ML Training and Inference
Ioannis Mavromatis, Kostas Katsaros, Aftab Khan
0
0
Machine learning (ML) has seen tremendous advancements, but its environmental footprint remains a concern. Acknowledging the growing environmental impact of ML this paper investigates Green ML, examining various model architectures and hyperparameters in both training and inference phases to identify energy-efficient practices. Our study leverages software-based power measurements for ease of replication across diverse configurations, models and datasets. In this paper, we examine multiple models and hardware configurations to identify correlations across the various measurements and metrics and key contributors to energy reduction. Our analysis offers practical guidelines for constructing sustainable ML operations, emphasising energy consumption and carbon footprint reductions while maintaining performance. As identified, short-lived profiling can quantify the long-term expected energy consumption. Moreover, model parameters can also be used to accurately estimate the expected total energy without the need for extensive experimentation.
6/21/2024
The Power of Training: How Different Neural Network Setups Influence the Energy Demand
Daniel Gei{ss}ler, Bo Zhou, Mengxi Liu, Sungho Suh, Paul Lukowicz
0
0
This work offers a heuristic evaluation of the effects of variations in machine learning training regimes and learning paradigms on the energy consumption of computing, especially HPC hardware with a life-cycle aware perspective. While increasing data availability and innovation in high-performance hardware fuels the training of sophisticated models, it also fosters the fading perception of energy consumption and carbon emission. Therefore, the goal of this work is to raise awareness about the energy impact of general training parameters and processes, from learning rate over batch size to knowledge transfer. Multiple setups with different hyperparameter configurations are evaluated on three different hardware systems. Among many results, we have found out that even with the same model and hardware to reach the same accuracy, improperly set training hyperparameters consume up to 5 times the energy of the optimal setup. We also extensively examined the energy-saving benefits of learning paradigms including recycling knowledge through pretraining and sharing knowledge through multitask training.
5/9/2024
🧠
Toward Cross-Layer Energy Optimizations in Machine Learning Systems
Jae-Won Chung, Mosharaf Chowdhury
0
0
The enormous energy consumption of machine learning (ML) and generative AI workloads shows no sign of waning, taking a toll on operating costs, power delivery, and environmental sustainability. Despite a long line of research on energy-efficient hardware, we found that software plays a critical role in ML energy optimization through two recent works: Zeus and Perseus. This is especially true for large language models (LLMs) because their model sizes and, therefore, energy demands are growing faster than hardware efficiency improvements. Therefore, we advocate for a cross-layer approach for energy optimizations in ML systems, where hardware provides architectural support that pushes energy-efficient software further, while software leverages and abstracts the hardware to develop techniques that bring hardware-agnostic energy-efficiency gains.
4/11/2024