Towards Human-AI Complementarity with Predictions Sets
2405.17544
0
0
Abstract
Decision support systems based on prediction sets have proven to be effective at helping human experts solve classification tasks. Rather than providing single-label predictions, these systems provide sets of label predictions constructed using conformal prediction, namely prediction sets, and ask human experts to predict label values from these sets. In this paper, we first show that the prediction sets constructed using conformal prediction are, in general, suboptimal in terms of average accuracy. Then, we show that the problem of finding the optimal prediction sets under which the human experts achieve the highest average accuracy is NP-hard. More strongly, unless P = NP, we show that the problem is hard to approximate to any factor less than the size of the label set. However, we introduce a simple and efficient greedy algorithm that, for a large class of expert models and non-conformity scores, is guaranteed to find prediction sets that provably offer equal or greater performance than those constructed using conformal prediction. Further, using a simulation study with both synthetic and real expert predictions, we demonstrate that, in practice, our greedy algorithm finds near-optimal prediction sets offering greater performance than conformal prediction.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of prediction sets, which provide a range of possible outcomes instead of a single prediction, as a way to foster human-AI complementarity in decision support systems.
- The authors argue that prediction sets can help humans better understand the uncertainty and limitations of AI models, leading to more informed and collaborative decision-making.
- The paper discusses the theoretical foundations of prediction sets, including conformal prediction, and explores their potential applications in various domains.
Plain English Explanation
Traditional AI models often provide a single, precise prediction for a given input. However, this can be problematic in high-stakes decision-making scenarios, where having a sense of the uncertainty and potential range of outcomes is crucial. This paper explores the use of prediction sets as a way to address this issue.
Prediction sets are a type of AI output that provides a range of possible outcomes, rather than a single prediction. This can help humans better understand the limitations and uncertainties of the AI model, allowing them to make more informed decisions. For example, instead of a model simply predicting whether a patient will respond well to a particular treatment, a prediction set might indicate that the patient has a 70% chance of responding well, a 20% chance of a moderate response, and a 10% chance of a poor response.
By incorporating prediction sets into decision support systems, the authors argue that humans and AI can work together more effectively. Humans can use the additional information provided by the prediction set to assess the risks and benefits of a decision, while the AI can provide a more nuanced and transparent view of the potential outcomes. This complementarity between human and AI decision-making can lead to better-informed and more collaborative decisions.
The paper also discusses the theoretical underpinnings of prediction sets, including conformal prediction and information-theoretic perspectives. These technical concepts are explored in more detail in the "Technical Explanation" section.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing the concept of prediction sets, which are a generalization of the more commonly used single-valued predictions. Prediction sets provide a range of possible outcomes, rather than a single point estimate, and can be constructed using various techniques, such as conformal prediction.
The authors then discuss the potential benefits of incorporating prediction sets into decision support systems. By providing a more nuanced and transparent view of the possible outcomes, prediction sets can help humans better understand the limitations and uncertainties of the AI model, leading to more informed and collaborative decision-making.
The paper also explores the theoretical foundations of prediction sets, including the conformal prediction framework and information-theoretic perspectives. These techniques are used to construct prediction sets that are well-calibrated and provide reliable estimates of the uncertainty associated with the predictions.
To demonstrate the practical applications of prediction sets, the authors present several use cases, including natural language processing and online model aggregation. These examples illustrate how prediction sets can be integrated into real-world decision support systems and provide valuable insights for both human and AI decision-makers.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling case for the use of prediction sets in decision support systems, highlighting their potential to foster human-AI complementarity. However, the authors acknowledge several caveats and limitations that should be considered.
One potential concern is the computational and storage requirements of generating and working with prediction sets, which may be more resource-intensive than traditional single-valued predictions. The authors suggest that further research is needed to optimize the efficiency of prediction set methods, particularly in high-stakes, time-sensitive applications.
Another area for further exploration is the interpretation and communication of prediction sets to human decision-makers. While the authors argue that prediction sets can provide more transparent and informative outputs, the effective translation of these complex probabilistic models into actionable insights may require additional user studies and interface design considerations.
Additionally, the authors note that the success of prediction sets in fostering human-AI complementarity will depend on the specific decision-making context and the level of trust and understanding between the human and AI collaborators. Careful consideration of the organizational and social factors that influence human-AI interactions will be crucial for the successful implementation of these systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a compelling vision for the use of prediction sets as a way to enhance human-AI complementarity in decision support systems. By providing a range of possible outcomes instead of a single prediction, prediction sets can help humans better understand the limitations and uncertainties of AI models, leading to more informed and collaborative decision-making.
The authors have laid out the theoretical foundations and practical applications of prediction sets, highlighting their potential to bridge the gap between human and AI decision-makers. While some challenges and limitations remain, the ideas presented in this paper offer a promising direction for the future of human-AI interaction and the development of more transparent and trustworthy decision support systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Conformal Prediction Sets Improve Human Decision Making
Jesse C. Cresswell, Yi Sui, Bhargava Kumar, Noel Vouitsis
0
0
In response to everyday queries, humans explicitly signal uncertainty and offer alternative answers when they are unsure. Machine learning models that output calibrated prediction sets through conformal prediction mimic this human behaviour; larger sets signal greater uncertainty while providing alternatives. In this work, we study the usefulness of conformal prediction sets as an aid for human decision making by conducting a pre-registered randomized controlled trial with conformal prediction sets provided to human subjects. With statistical significance, we find that when humans are given conformal prediction sets their accuracy on tasks improves compared to fixed-size prediction sets with the same coverage guarantee. The results show that quantifying model uncertainty with conformal prediction is helpful for human-in-the-loop decision making and human-AI teams.
6/11/2024
Conformal Prediction for Deep Classifier via Label Ranking
Jianguo Huang, Huajun Xi, Linjun Zhang, Huaxiu Yao, Yue Qiu, Hongxin Wei
0
0
Conformal prediction is a statistical framework that generates prediction sets containing ground-truth labels with a desired coverage guarantee. The predicted probabilities produced by machine learning models are generally miscalibrated, leading to large prediction sets in conformal prediction. To address this issue, we propose a novel algorithm named $textit{Sorted Adaptive Prediction Sets}$ (SAPS), which discards all the probability values except for the maximum softmax probability. The key idea behind SAPS is to minimize the dependence of the non-conformity score on the probability values while retaining the uncertainty information. In this manner, SAPS can produce compact prediction sets and communicate instance-wise uncertainty. Extensive experiments validate that SAPS not only lessens the prediction sets but also broadly enhances the conditional coverage rate of prediction sets.
6/7/2024
A Conformal Prediction Score that is Robust to Label Noise
Coby Penso, Jacob Goldberger
0
0
Conformal Prediction (CP) quantifies network uncertainty by building a small prediction set with a pre-defined probability that the correct class is within this set. In this study we tackle the problem of CP calibration based on a validation set with noisy labels. We introduce a conformal score that is robust to label noise. The noise-free conformal score is estimated using the noisy labeled data and the noise level. In the test phase the noise-free score is used to form the prediction set. We applied the proposed algorithm to several standard medical imaging classification datasets. We show that our method outperforms current methods by a large margin, in terms of the average size of the prediction set, while maintaining the required coverage.
5/22/2024
Controlling Counterfactual Harm in Decision Support Systems Based on Prediction Sets
Eleni Straitouri, Suhas Thejaswi, Manuel Gomez Rodriguez
0
0
Decision support systems based on prediction sets help humans solve multiclass classification tasks by narrowing down the set of potential label values to a subset of them, namely a prediction set, and asking them to always predict label values from the prediction sets. While this type of systems have been proven to be effective at improving the average accuracy of the predictions made by humans, by restricting human agency, they may cause harm$unicode{x2014}$a human who has succeeded at predicting the ground-truth label of an instance on their own may have failed had they used these systems. In this paper, our goal is to control how frequently a decision support system based on prediction sets may cause harm, by design. To this end, we start by characterizing the above notion of harm using the theoretical framework of structural causal models. Then, we show that, under a natural, albeit unverifiable, monotonicity assumption, we can estimate how frequently a system may cause harm using only predictions made by humans on their own. Further, we also show that, under a weaker monotonicity assumption, which can be verified experimentally, we can bound how frequently a system may cause harm again using only predictions made by humans on their own. Building upon these assumptions, we introduce a computational framework to design decision support systems based on prediction sets that are guaranteed to cause harm less frequently than a user-specified value using conformal risk control. We validate our framework using real human predictions from two different human subject studies and show that, in decision support systems based on prediction sets, there is a trade-off between accuracy and counterfactual harm.
6/12/2024