Conformal Prediction for Natural Language Processing: A Survey
2405.01976
0
0
🔮
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of large language models and natural language processing (NLP) applications creates a crucial need for uncertainty quantification to mitigate risks such as hallucinations and to enhance decision-making reliability in critical applications. Conformal prediction is emerging as a theoretically sound and practically useful framework, combining flexibility with strong statistical guarantees. Its model-agnostic and distribution-free nature makes it particularly promising to address the current shortcomings of NLP systems that stem from the absence of uncertainty quantification. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of conformal prediction techniques, their guarantees, and existing applications in NLP, pointing to directions for future research and open challenges.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Large language models and natural language processing (NLP) applications are proliferating rapidly
- This creates a need for uncertainty quantification to mitigate risks like hallucinations and enhance decision-making reliability in critical applications
- Conformal prediction is emerging as a promising framework that combines flexibility with strong statistical guarantees
- It is model-agnostic and distribution-free, making it well-suited to address shortcomings of current NLP systems
Plain English Explanation
As large language models and natural language processing (NLP) technologies become more advanced and widely used, it's crucial to have ways to measure the uncertainty in their outputs. This is important to avoid issues like hallucinations (where the model generates plausible-sounding but factually incorrect information) and to ensure the reliability of these systems, especially in high-stakes applications.
Conformal prediction is a framework that can help address this need. It provides a way to quantify the uncertainty in a model's predictions in a flexible yet statistically rigorous manner. Crucially, conformal prediction is "model-agnostic" - it can work with any type of machine learning model, not just language models. It's also "distribution-free," meaning it doesn't make assumptions about the underlying data distribution. This makes it a promising approach for the current limitations of NLP systems, which often lack good ways to measure and convey the uncertainty in their outputs.
Technical Explanation
This paper provides a comprehensive survey of conformal prediction techniques, their theoretical guarantees, and their applications in the field of natural language processing (NLP). Conformal prediction is a framework that allows for the construction of prediction sets that come with strong statistical guarantees, such as valid coverage probabilities. Unlike traditional machine learning approaches that output a single prediction, conformal prediction produces a set of plausible predictions along with a measure of confidence.
The paper discusses how the model-agnostic and distribution-free nature of conformal prediction makes it well-suited to address the shortcomings of current NLP systems, which often lack reliable uncertainty quantification. It reviews various conformal prediction techniques and their theoretical properties, as well as existing applications of conformal prediction in NLP tasks such as text classification, named entity recognition, and language generation. The paper also highlights directions for future research and open challenges in this area.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of uncertainty quantification in NLP systems and the potential of conformal prediction as a promising framework to address this need. The authors provide a thorough and balanced overview of the topic, covering both the strengths and limitations of conformal prediction.
One potential limitation discussed is the computational overhead of conformal prediction, which may be a concern for real-time or high-throughput NLP applications. The authors also acknowledge that more research is needed to fully understand the performance of conformal prediction on different types of NLP tasks and data distributions.
Additionally, while the paper highlights the model-agnostic nature of conformal prediction, it would be valuable to see more comparisons between conformal prediction and other uncertainty quantification methods, such as Bayesian approaches, to better understand its relative strengths and weaknesses.
Overall, this paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners interested in enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of NLP systems through principled uncertainty quantification techniques.
Conclusion
This paper underscores the critical need for uncertainty quantification in the rapidly growing field of large language models and natural language processing. It presents conformal prediction as a promising framework that can provide strong statistical guarantees while remaining flexible and model-agnostic. By surveying the existing research and highlighting future directions, the paper lays the groundwork for further advancements in this important area, which could have significant implications for the development of more reliable and trustworthy NLP systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Conformal Language Modeling
Victor Quach, Adam Fisch, Tal Schuster, Adam Yala, Jae Ho Sohn, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Regina Barzilay
0
0
We propose a novel approach to conformal prediction for generative language models (LMs). Standard conformal prediction produces prediction sets -- in place of single predictions -- that have rigorous, statistical performance guarantees. LM responses are typically sampled from the model's predicted distribution over the large, combinatorial output space of natural language. Translating this process to conformal prediction, we calibrate a stopping rule for sampling different outputs from the LM that get added to a growing set of candidates until we are confident that the output set is sufficient. Since some samples may be low-quality, we also simultaneously calibrate and apply a rejection rule for removing candidates from the output set to reduce noise. Similar to conformal prediction, we prove that the sampled set returned by our procedure contains at least one acceptable answer with high probability, while still being empirically precise (i.e., small) on average. Furthermore, within this set of candidate responses, we show that we can also accurately identify subsets of individual components -- such as phrases or sentences -- that are each independently correct (e.g., that are not hallucinations), again with statistical guarantees. We demonstrate the promise of our approach on multiple tasks in open-domain question answering, text summarization, and radiology report generation using different LM variants.
6/4/2024
🔮
An Information Theoretic Perspective on Conformal Prediction
Alvaro H. C. Correia, Fabio Valerio Massoli, Christos Louizos, Arash Behboodi
0
0
Conformal Prediction (CP) is a distribution-free uncertainty estimation framework that constructs prediction sets guaranteed to contain the true answer with a user-specified probability. Intuitively, the size of the prediction set encodes a general notion of uncertainty, with larger sets associated with higher degrees of uncertainty. In this work, we leverage information theory to connect conformal prediction to other notions of uncertainty. More precisely, we prove three different ways to upper bound the intrinsic uncertainty, as described by the conditional entropy of the target variable given the inputs, by combining CP with information theoretical inequalities. Moreover, we demonstrate two direct and useful applications of such connection between conformal prediction and information theory: (i) more principled and effective conformal training objectives that generalize previous approaches and enable end-to-end training of machine learning models from scratch, and (ii) a natural mechanism to incorporate side information into conformal prediction. We empirically validate both applications in centralized and federated learning settings, showing our theoretical results translate to lower inefficiency (average prediction set size) for popular CP methods.
5/6/2024
Large language model validity via enhanced conformal prediction methods
John J. Cherian, Isaac Gibbs, Emmanuel J. Cand`es
0
0
We develop new conformal inference methods for obtaining validity guarantees on the output of large language models (LLMs). Prior work in conformal language modeling identifies a subset of the text that satisfies a high-probability guarantee of correctness. These methods work by filtering claims from the LLM's original response if a scoring function evaluated on the claim fails to exceed a threshold calibrated via split conformal prediction. Existing methods in this area suffer from two deficiencies. First, the guarantee stated is not conditionally valid. The trustworthiness of the filtering step may vary based on the topic of the response. Second, because the scoring function is imperfect, the filtering step can remove many valuable and accurate claims. We address both of these challenges via two new conformal methods. First, we generalize the conditional conformal procedure of Gibbs et al. (2023) in order to adaptively issue weaker guarantees when they are required to preserve the utility of the output. Second, we show how to systematically improve the quality of the scoring function via a novel algorithm for differentiating through the conditional conformal procedure. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
6/17/2024
🔮
A comparative study of conformal prediction methods for valid uncertainty quantification in machine learning
Nicolas Dewolf
0
0
In the past decades, most work in the area of data analysis and machine learning was focused on optimizing predictive models and getting better results than what was possible with existing models. To what extent the metrics with which such improvements were measured were accurately capturing the intended goal, whether the numerical differences in the resulting values were significant, or whether uncertainty played a role in this study and if it should have been taken into account, was of secondary importance. Whereas probability theory, be it frequentist or Bayesian, used to be the gold standard in science before the advent of the supercomputer, it was quickly replaced in favor of black box models and sheer computing power because of their ability to handle large data sets. This evolution sadly happened at the expense of interpretability and trustworthiness. However, while people are still trying to improve the predictive power of their models, the community is starting to realize that for many applications it is not so much the exact prediction that is of importance, but rather the variability or uncertainty. The work in this dissertation tries to further the quest for a world where everyone is aware of uncertainty, of how important it is and how to embrace it instead of fearing it. A specific, though general, framework that allows anyone to obtain accurate uncertainty estimates is singled out and analysed. Certain aspects and applications of the framework -- dubbed `conformal prediction' -- are studied in detail. Whereas many approaches to uncertainty quantification make strong assumptions about the data, conformal prediction is, at the time of writing, the only framework that deserves the title `distribution-free'. No parametric assumptions have to be made and the nonparametric results also hold without having to resort to the law of large numbers in the asymptotic regime.
5/6/2024