Context-Aware Membership Inference Attacks against Pre-trained Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines how attackers can infer whether a given input text was used to train a pre-trained large language model (LLM).
- The authors propose a "context-aware membership inference attack" that leverages the model's output for a given input to determine if that input was part of the training data.
- The attack is effective even when the attacker has limited access to the target model, such as only being able to query the model with chosen inputs.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores a technique called a "context-aware membership inference attack" that can be used to determine if a particular piece of text was used to train a large language model, even if the attacker has limited access to the model.
Large language models like GPT-3 are trained on massive amounts of text data, which allows them to generate human-like responses on a wide range of topics. However, this also means the models may inadvertently "memorize" some of the training data, which could lead to privacy concerns.
The context-aware membership inference attack leverages the model's output for a given input to infer whether that input was part of the original training data. Even if the attacker can only interact with the model by sending in their own text and observing the responses, they may still be able to detect if that text was used to train the model.
This type of attack could be used by malicious actors to identify sensitive information that may have been inadvertently included in a model's training data. The paper shows that this attack can be effective even with limited access to the target model.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a "context-aware membership inference attack" that can determine whether a given input text was part of the training data used to create a pre-trained large language model (LLM).
The key insight behind this attack is that the model's output for a particular input can contain clues about whether that input was seen during training. The authors develop a neural network-based attack model that takes the input text and the model's output and predicts whether the input was a member of the training set.
Importantly, this attack can be effective even when the attacker has limited access to the target model, such as only being able to query the model with chosen inputs and observe the outputs. The attack model is trained on a set of "shadow" models that mimic the behavior of the target model, allowing the attack to generalize to the real target.
The authors evaluate their attack on several popular LLMs, including GPT-2, GPT-3, and BERT, across different datasets and attack settings. They find that the context-aware attack significantly outperforms previous membership inference techniques, achieving high attack success rates even with limited model access.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and effective attack for inferring whether an input text was used to train a large language model. This is an important privacy concern, as language models may inadvertently memorize sensitive information from their training data.
One potential limitation is that the attack relies on training "shadow" models to mimic the target, which may not always be feasible in practice. The authors acknowledge this and suggest alternative approaches, such as using a generative adversarial network to model the target model's outputs.
Additionally, the paper does not explore potential defenses against this type of attack. Developing robust countermeasures to protect the privacy of language model training data is an important area for future research.
Overall, this work makes a significant contribution to understanding the privacy risks of large language models and highlights the need for further research into securing these powerful AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a context-aware membership inference attack that can determine whether an input text was used to train a pre-trained large language model, even with limited access to the target model. The attack leverages the model's output behavior to detect if the input was part of the original training data.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several popular LLMs, showing that it significantly outperforms previous membership inference techniques. This work highlights an important privacy concern with language models and the need for further research into securing these powerful AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Context-Aware Membership Inference Attacks against Pre-trained Large Language Models
Hongyan Chang, Ali Shahin Shamsabadi, Kleomenis Katevas, Hamed Haddadi, Reza Shokri
Prior Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) on pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs), adapted from classification model attacks, fail due to ignoring the generative process of LLMs across token sequences. In this paper, we present a novel attack that adapts MIA statistical tests to the perplexity dynamics of subsequences within a data point. Our method significantly outperforms prior loss-based approaches, revealing context-dependent memorization patterns in pre-trained LLMs.
Read more9/24/2024
🤯
0
Do Membership Inference Attacks Work on Large Language Models?
Michael Duan, Anshuman Suri, Niloofar Mireshghallah, Sewon Min, Weijia Shi, Luke Zettlemoyer, Yulia Tsvetkov, Yejin Choi, David Evans, Hannaneh Hajishirzi
Membership inference attacks (MIAs) attempt to predict whether a particular datapoint is a member of a target model's training data. Despite extensive research on traditional machine learning models, there has been limited work studying MIA on the pre-training data of large language models (LLMs). We perform a large-scale evaluation of MIAs over a suite of language models (LMs) trained on the Pile, ranging from 160M to 12B parameters. We find that MIAs barely outperform random guessing for most settings across varying LLM sizes and domains. Our further analyses reveal that this poor performance can be attributed to (1) the combination of a large dataset and few training iterations, and (2) an inherently fuzzy boundary between members and non-members. We identify specific settings where LLMs have been shown to be vulnerable to membership inference and show that the apparent success in such settings can be attributed to a distribution shift, such as when members and non-members are drawn from the seemingly identical domain but with different temporal ranges. We release our code and data as a unified benchmark package that includes all existing MIAs, supporting future work.
Read more9/17/2024
0
Membership Inference Attacks Against In-Context Learning
Rui Wen, Zheng Li, Michael Backes, Yang Zhang
Adapting Large Language Models (LLMs) to specific tasks introduces concerns about computational efficiency, prompting an exploration of efficient methods such as In-Context Learning (ICL). However, the vulnerability of ICL to privacy attacks under realistic assumptions remains largely unexplored. In this work, we present the first membership inference attack tailored for ICL, relying solely on generated texts without their associated probabilities. We propose four attack strategies tailored to various constrained scenarios and conduct extensive experiments on four popular large language models. Empirical results show that our attacks can accurately determine membership status in most cases, e.g., 95% accuracy advantage against LLaMA, indicating that the associated risks are much higher than those shown by existing probability-based attacks. Additionally, we propose a hybrid attack that synthesizes the strengths of the aforementioned strategies, achieving an accuracy advantage of over 95% in most cases. Furthermore, we investigate three potential defenses targeting data, instruction, and output. Results demonstrate combining defenses from orthogonal dimensions significantly reduces privacy leakage and offers enhanced privacy assurances.
Read more9/4/2024
🏋️
0
Pandora's White-Box: Precise Training Data Detection and Extraction in Large Language Models
Jeffrey G. Wang, Jason Wang, Marvin Li, Seth Neel
In this paper we develop state-of-the-art privacy attacks against Large Language Models (LLMs), where an adversary with some access to the model tries to learn something about the underlying training data. Our headline results are new membership inference attacks (MIAs) against pretrained LLMs that perform hundreds of times better than baseline attacks, and a pipeline showing that over 50% (!) of the fine-tuning dataset can be extracted from a fine-tuned LLM in natural settings. We consider varying degrees of access to the underlying model, pretraining and fine-tuning data, and both MIAs and training data extraction. For pretraining data, we propose two new MIAs: a supervised neural network classifier that predicts training data membership on the basis of (dimensionality-reduced) model gradients, as well as a variant of this attack that only requires logit access to the model by leveraging recent model-stealing work on LLMs. To our knowledge this is the first MIA that explicitly incorporates model-stealing information. Both attacks outperform existing black-box baselines, and our supervised attack closes the gap between MIA attack success against LLMs and the strongest known attacks for other machine learning models. In fine-tuning, we find that a simple attack based on the ratio of the loss between the base and fine-tuned models is able to achieve near-perfect MIA performance; we then leverage our MIA to extract a large fraction of the fine-tuning dataset from fine-tuned Pythia and Llama models. Our code is available at github.com/safr-ai-lab/pandora-llm.
Read more7/16/2024