Context Injection Attacks on Large Language Models
2405.20234
1
0
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and Llama-2 have become prevalent in real-world applications, exhibiting impressive text generation performance. LLMs are fundamentally developed from a scenario where the input data remains static and lacks a clear structure. To behave interactively over time, LLM-based chat systems must integrate additional contextual information (i.e., chat history) into their inputs, following a pre-defined structure. This paper identifies how such integration can expose LLMs to misleading context from untrusted sources and fail to differentiate between system and user inputs, allowing users to inject context. We present a systematic methodology for conducting context injection attacks aimed at eliciting disallowed responses by introducing fabricated context. This could lead to illegal actions, inappropriate content, or technology misuse. Our context fabrication strategies, acceptance elicitation and word anonymization, effectively create misleading contexts that can be structured with attacker-customized prompt templates, achieving injection through malicious user messages. Comprehensive evaluations on real-world LLMs such as ChatGPT and Llama-2 confirm the efficacy of the proposed attack with success rates reaching 97%. We also discuss potential countermeasures that can be adopted for attack detection and developing more secure models. Our findings provide insights into the challenges associated with the real-world deployment of LLMs for interactive and structured data scenarios.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines "context injection attacks" on large language models (LLMs) - techniques that can be used to manipulate the output of these AI systems by carefully crafting the input prompts.
- The researchers demonstrate how these attacks can be used to hijack the behavior of LLMs and make them generate harmful or malicious content.
- They also propose potential defenses and mitigation strategies to help protect against such attacks.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text on a wide range of topics. However, researchers have found that these models can be vulnerable to "context injection attacks" - where the input prompts are carefully crafted to manipulate the model's behavior and make it produce unintended or harmful outputs.
Imagine you're asking a language model to write a story. Normally, it would generate a coherent narrative based on the prompt. But attackers could insert subtle cues or instructions into the prompt that hijack the model, causing it to generate content promoting violence, hate, or other harmful themes instead. This is the core idea behind context injection attacks.
The researchers in this paper demonstrate several examples of how these attacks can work, showing how LLMs can be manipulated to produce toxic, biased, or otherwise problematic text. They also discuss potential defenses, such as using more rigorous prompt engineering or implementing safety checks in the model's architecture.
Ultimately, this research highlights an important security and ethics challenge as we increasingly rely on powerful AI systems like LLMs. While these models have incredible capabilities, we need to be vigilant about potential misuse and work to develop safeguards to protect against malicious exploitation.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing background on large language models (LLMs) and their growing use in a variety of applications, from content generation to task completion. The researchers then introduce the concept of "context injection attacks" - techniques that involve carefully crafting input prompts to manipulate the behavior of these models.
Through a series of experiments, the researchers demonstrate how attackers can leverage context injection to hijack the outputs of popular LLMs like GPT-3. For example, they show how inserting subtle cues or instructions into a prompt can cause the model to generate text promoting violence, hate, or other harmful themes - even if the original prompt was benign.
The paper also explores potential mitigation strategies, such as using more rigorous prompt engineering, implementing safety checks in the model's architecture, and developing better understanding of the "reasoning" underlying LLM outputs. The researchers suggest that a multilayered approach combining technical and non-technical defenses may be necessary to protect against context injection attacks.
Overall, the key insight from this research is that the powerful language generation capabilities of LLMs can be exploited by adversaries who understand how to carefully manipulate the input context. As these models become more ubiquitous, the authors argue that addressing this security and ethics challenge will be crucial to ensuring their safe and responsible deployment.
Critical Analysis
The researchers in this paper have made an important contribution by shining a light on a significant vulnerability in large language models. Their work demonstrates that even state-of-the-art AI systems like GPT-3 can be susceptible to malicious manipulation through carefully crafted input prompts.
However, it's worth noting that the paper does not provide a comprehensive solution to the context injection problem. While the proposed mitigation strategies, such as prompt engineering and architectural safeguards, are valuable, the authors acknowledge that a more holistic approach may be necessary. Further research is still needed to develop more robust and reliable defenses against these types of attacks.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on the technical aspects of context injection, but there are also significant ethical and societal implications that warrant deeper exploration. For example, the researchers could have delved more into the potential real-world consequences of these attacks, such as the spread of misinformation, the amplification of hate speech, or the manipulation of public discourse.
Addressing these challenges will require not only technical solutions, but also careful consideration of the broader implications and the development of appropriate governance frameworks to ensure the responsible development and deployment of large language models.
Conclusion
This paper presents a critical examination of "context injection attacks" - techniques that can be used to manipulate the outputs of large language models (LLMs) by carefully crafting input prompts. The researchers demonstrate how these attacks can be leveraged to hijack the behavior of LLMs, causing them to generate harmful or malicious content.
While the proposed mitigation strategies are a valuable starting point, the authors acknowledge that a more comprehensive approach is needed to protect against these types of attacks. Addressing the security and ethics challenges posed by context injection will require ongoing research, as well as the development of robust governance frameworks to ensure the responsible use of these powerful AI systems.
As LLMs become increasingly ubiquitous, understanding and mitigating the risks associated with context injection attacks will be crucial to realizing the full potential of these technologies while safeguarding against their misuse.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Hijacking Context in Large Multi-modal Models
Joonhyun Jeong
0
0
Recently, Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) have demonstrated their ability to understand the visual contents of images given the instructions regarding the images. Built upon the Large Language Models (LLMs), LMMs also inherit their abilities and characteristics such as in-context learning where a coherent sequence of images and texts are given as the input prompt. However, we identify a new limitation of off-the-shelf LMMs where a small fraction of incoherent images or text descriptions mislead LMMs to only generate biased output about the hijacked context, not the originally intended context. To address this, we propose a pre-filtering method that removes irrelevant contexts via GPT-4V, based on its robustness towards distribution shift within the contexts. We further investigate whether replacing the hijacked visual and textual contexts with the correlated ones via GPT-4V and text-to-image models can help yield coherent responses.
5/14/2024
💬
Hijacking Large Language Models via Adversarial In-Context Learning
Yao Qiang, Xiangyu Zhou, Dongxiao Zhu
0
0
In-context learning (ICL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm leveraging LLMs for specific downstream tasks by utilizing labeled examples as demonstrations (demos) in the precondition prompts. Despite its promising performance, ICL suffers from instability with the choice and arrangement of examples. Additionally, crafted adversarial attacks pose a notable threat to the robustness of ICL. However, existing attacks are either easy to detect, rely on external models, or lack specificity towards ICL. This work introduces a novel transferable attack against ICL to address these issues, aiming to hijack LLMs to generate the target response or jailbreak. Our hijacking attack leverages a gradient-based prompt search method to learn and append imperceptible adversarial suffixes to the in-context demos without directly contaminating the user queries. Comprehensive experimental results across different generation and jailbreaking tasks highlight the effectiveness of our hijacking attack, resulting in distracted attention towards adversarial tokens and consequently leading to unwanted target outputs. We also propose a defense strategy against hijacking attacks through the use of extra clean demos, which enhances the robustness of LLMs during ICL. Broadly, this work reveals the significant security vulnerabilities of LLMs and emphasizes the necessity for in-depth studies on their robustness.
6/18/2024
Large Language Models in Wireless Application Design: In-Context Learning-enhanced Automatic Network Intrusion Detection
Han Zhang, Akram Bin Sediq, Ali Afana, Melike Erol-Kantarci
0
0
Large language models (LLMs), especially generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs), have recently demonstrated outstanding ability in information comprehension and problem-solving. This has motivated many studies in applying LLMs to wireless communication networks. In this paper, we propose a pre-trained LLM-empowered framework to perform fully automatic network intrusion detection. Three in-context learning methods are designed and compared to enhance the performance of LLMs. With experiments on a real network intrusion detection dataset, in-context learning proves to be highly beneficial in improving the task processing performance in a way that no further training or fine-tuning of LLMs is required. We show that for GPT-4, testing accuracy and F1-Score can be improved by 90%. Moreover, pre-trained LLMs demonstrate big potential in performing wireless communication-related tasks. Specifically, the proposed framework can reach an accuracy and F1-Score of over 95% on different types of attacks with GPT-4 using only 10 in-context learning examples.
5/21/2024
💬
Vocabulary Attack to Hijack Large Language Model Applications
Patrick Levi, Christoph P. Neumann
0
0
The fast advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) are driving an increasing number of applications. Together with the growing number of users, we also see an increasing number of attackers who try to outsmart these systems. They want the model to reveal confidential information, specific false information, or offensive behavior. To this end, they manipulate their instructions for the LLM by inserting separators or rephrasing them systematically until they reach their goal. Our approach is different. It inserts words from the model vocabulary. We find these words using an optimization procedure and embeddings from another LLM (attacker LLM). We prove our approach by goal hijacking two popular open-source LLMs from the Llama2 and the Flan-T5 families, respectively. We present two main findings. First, our approach creates inconspicuous instructions and therefore it is hard to detect. For many attack cases, we find that even a single word insertion is sufficient. Second, we demonstrate that we can conduct our attack using a different model than the target model to conduct our attack with.
5/31/2024