Hijacking Large Language Models via Adversarial In-Context Learning
2311.09948
0
0
💬
Abstract
In-context learning (ICL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm leveraging LLMs for specific downstream tasks by utilizing labeled examples as demonstrations (demos) in the precondition prompts. Despite its promising performance, ICL suffers from instability with the choice and arrangement of examples. Additionally, crafted adversarial attacks pose a notable threat to the robustness of ICL. However, existing attacks are either easy to detect, rely on external models, or lack specificity towards ICL. This work introduces a novel transferable attack against ICL to address these issues, aiming to hijack LLMs to generate the target response or jailbreak. Our hijacking attack leverages a gradient-based prompt search method to learn and append imperceptible adversarial suffixes to the in-context demos without directly contaminating the user queries. Comprehensive experimental results across different generation and jailbreaking tasks highlight the effectiveness of our hijacking attack, resulting in distracted attention towards adversarial tokens and consequently leading to unwanted target outputs. We also propose a defense strategy against hijacking attacks through the use of extra clean demos, which enhances the robustness of LLMs during ICL. Broadly, this work reveals the significant security vulnerabilities of LLMs and emphasizes the necessity for in-depth studies on their robustness.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- In-context learning (ICL) is a powerful technique that uses labeled examples in prompts to help language models perform specific tasks.
- Despite its strong performance, ICL can be unstable and vulnerable to adversarial attacks that hijack the model to generate unintended outputs.
- Existing attacks have limitations, so this paper introduces a novel transferable attack to address these issues.
Plain English Explanation
In-context learning (ICL) is a way of using language models for specific tasks. The model is given some example inputs and outputs as part of the prompt, which helps it understand what the task is and how to do it. This can lead to very good performance on the task.
However, ICL has some problems. The choice and arrangement of the example inputs and outputs can make the model unstable - small changes can cause big differences in the output. Additionally, attackers can create adversarial inputs that trick the model into generating harmful or unintended outputs, even if the original user prompt was benign.
Existing attacks on ICL models have some limitations. They may be easy to detect, rely on additional external models, or lack specificity to the ICL setup. This paper introduces a new type of attack that tries to overcome these issues. The key idea is to append subtle adversarial "suffixes" to the example inputs, which then cause the model to generate the attacker's desired output when given a normal user prompt.
The paper shows that this attack can be effective across different language generation and "jailbreaking" tasks, where the model is tricked into producing forbidden outputs. The authors also propose a defense strategy, using additional clean example inputs to make the model more robust to these types of attacks.
Overall, this work highlights significant security vulnerabilities in large language models and emphasizes the need for more research on their robustness.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel "transferable attack" against in-context learning (ICL) systems. The key innovation is a gradient-based prompt search method that learns imperceptible adversarial "suffixes" to append to the example inputs (or "demos") in the prompt. This allows the attacker to hijack the language model and generate the target response, without directly modifying the user's original prompt.
The paper evaluates the attack across different generation and "jailbreaking" tasks, where the goal is to produce outputs that violate the model's intended behavior. The results show the attack can effectively distract the model's attention towards the adversarial tokens, leading to the desired target outputs.
To defend against these attacks, the authors propose using additional "clean" example demos alongside the original demos. This "hint-enhanced context learning" approach improves the model's robustness, making it harder for the adversarial suffixes to have the intended effect.
The paper also discusses potential limitations and avenues for future work, such as "locally differentially private context learning" to enhance privacy, and "using natural language explanations to improve robustness" as an alternative defense strategy.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and concerning attack on the security of in-context learning systems. By exploiting the sensitivity of ICL to the choice and arrangement of example inputs, the authors demonstrate how an attacker can subtly manipulate the prompt to hijack the model's behavior, even for benign user requests.
While the attack is technically sophisticated, the authors do a commendable job of explaining the key ideas in accessible terms. The use of analogies and examples helps make the complex concepts more understandable for a general audience.
That said, the paper could have delved deeper into the potential real-world implications and societal impact of such attacks. For instance, how might bad actors leverage these techniques to generate harmful content or bypass content moderation systems? What are the broader ethical considerations around the security and robustness of large language models?
Additionally, while the proposed defense strategy of using "clean" example demos is a reasonable approach, the authors could have explored other mitigation techniques in more detail. For example, techniques like "jailbreak-guard aligned language models" or careful prompt engineering may also help enhance the robustness of ICL systems.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution by shedding light on a significant vulnerability in a widely used AI paradigm. However, further research is needed to fully understand the implications and develop comprehensive solutions to ensure the safety and security of language models in high-stakes applications.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel transferable attack against in-context learning (ICL) systems, which leverages a gradient-based prompt search method to learn and append imperceptible adversarial suffixes to the example inputs. This allows the attacker to hijack the language model and generate the target response, even for benign user prompts.
The comprehensive experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of this attack across different generation and jailbreaking tasks, highlighting the serious security vulnerabilities of large language models. To address these issues, the authors propose a defense strategy using additional clean example demos, which can enhance the robustness of ICL systems.
This work underscores the urgent need for in-depth research on the security and robustness of language models, as they become increasingly prevalent in high-stakes applications. Developing more secure and reliable AI systems is crucial to ensure they can be safely deployed and used to benefit society.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Jailbreak and Guard Aligned Language Models with Only Few In-Context Demonstrations
Zeming Wei, Yifei Wang, Ang Li, Yichuan Mo, Yisen Wang
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable success in various tasks, yet their safety and the risk of generating harmful content remain pressing concerns. In this paper, we delve into the potential of In-Context Learning (ICL) to modulate the alignment of LLMs. Specifically, we propose the In-Context Attack (ICA) which employs harmful demonstrations to subvert LLMs, and the In-Context Defense (ICD) which bolsters model resilience through examples that demonstrate refusal to produce harmful responses. We offer theoretical insights to elucidate how a limited set of in-context demonstrations can pivotally influence the safety alignment of LLMs. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate the efficacy of ICA and ICD in respectively elevating and mitigating the success rates of jailbreaking prompts. Our findings illuminate the profound influence of ICL on LLM behavior, opening new avenues for improving the safety of LLMs.
5/28/2024
🛠️
Prompt Optimization via Adversarial In-Context Learning
Xuan Long Do, Yiran Zhao, Hannah Brown, Yuxi Xie, James Xu Zhao, Nancy F. Chen, Kenji Kawaguchi, Michael Shieh, Junxian He
0
0
We propose a new method, Adversarial In-Context Learning (adv-ICL), to optimize prompt for in-context learning (ICL) by employing one LLM as a generator, another as a discriminator, and a third as a prompt modifier. As in traditional adversarial learning, adv-ICL is implemented as a two-player game between the generator and discriminator, where the generator tries to generate realistic enough output to fool the discriminator. In each round, given an input prefixed by task instructions and several exemplars, the generator produces an output. The discriminator is then tasked with classifying the generator input-output pair as model-generated or real data. Based on the discriminator loss, the prompt modifier proposes possible edits to the generator and discriminator prompts, and the edits that most improve the adversarial loss are selected. We show that adv-ICL results in significant improvements over state-of-the-art prompt optimization techniques for both open and closed-source models on 11 generation and classification tasks including summarization, arithmetic reasoning, machine translation, data-to-text generation, and the MMLU and big-bench hard benchmarks. In addition, because our method uses pre-trained models and updates only prompts rather than model parameters, it is computationally efficient, easy to extend to any LLM and task, and effective in low-resource settings.
6/26/2024
Evaluating the Adversarial Robustness of Retrieval-Based In-Context Learning for Large Language Models
Simon Chi Lok Yu, Jie He, Pasquale Minervini, Jeff Z. Pan
0
0
With the emergence of large language models, such as LLaMA and OpenAI GPT-3, In-Context Learning (ICL) gained significant attention due to its effectiveness and efficiency. However, ICL is very sensitive to the choice, order, and verbaliser used to encode the demonstrations in the prompt. Retrieval-Augmented ICL methods try to address this problem by leveraging retrievers to extract semantically related examples as demonstrations. While this approach yields more accurate results, its robustness against various types of adversarial attacks, including perturbations on test samples, demonstrations, and retrieved data, remains under-explored. Our study reveals that retrieval-augmented models can enhance robustness against test sample attacks, outperforming vanilla ICL with a 4.87% reduction in Attack Success Rate (ASR); however, they exhibit overconfidence in the demonstrations, leading to a 2% increase in ASR for demonstration attacks. Adversarial training can help improve the robustness of ICL methods to adversarial attacks; however, such a training scheme can be too costly in the context of LLMs. As an alternative, we introduce an effective training-free adversarial defence method, DARD, which enriches the example pool with those attacked samples. We show that DARD yields improvements in performance and robustness, achieving a 15% reduction in ASR over the baselines. Code and data are released to encourage further research: https://github.com/simonucl/adv-retreival-icl
5/28/2024
Locally Differentially Private In-Context Learning
Chunyan Zheng, Keke Sun, Wenhao Zhao, Haibo Zhou, Lixin Jiang, Shaoyang Song, Chunlai Zhou
0
0
Large pretrained language models (LLMs) have shown surprising In-Context Learning (ICL) ability. An important application in deploying large language models is to augment LLMs with a private database for some specific task. The main problem with this promising commercial use is that LLMs have been shown to memorize their training data and their prompt data are vulnerable to membership inference attacks (MIA) and prompt leaking attacks. In order to deal with this problem, we treat LLMs as untrusted in privacy and propose a locally differentially private framework of in-context learning(LDP-ICL) in the settings where labels are sensitive. Considering the mechanisms of in-context learning in Transformers by gradient descent, we provide an analysis of the trade-off between privacy and utility in such LDP-ICL for classification. Moreover, we apply LDP-ICL to the discrete distribution estimation problem. In the end, we perform several experiments to demonstrate our analysis results.
5/9/2024