Contextualized Sequence Likelihood: Enhanced Confidence Scores for Natural Language Generation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new method called Contextualized Sequence Likelihood (CSL) for generating enhanced confidence scores for natural language generation models.
- The key idea is to leverage the contextual information in the input sequence to better estimate the likelihood of the generated output sequence, leading to more accurate and reliable confidence scores.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of CSL on various natural language tasks, showing improvements over existing confidence scoring methods.
Plain English Explanation
When machines generate human-like text, it's important to know how confident the model is in its output. This is known as "confidence scoring." Enhancing trust in LLM-generated code summaries with calibrated confidence and Harnessing the Power of Large Language Model Uncertainty-Aware Modeling discuss the importance of reliable confidence scores.
The researchers in this paper realized that existing confidence scoring methods don't fully take into account the context of the input text. Their new approach, called Contextualized Sequence Likelihood (CSL), uses the surrounding words to better estimate how likely the generated text is.
Imagine you're trying to predict the next word in a sentence. Knowing the full sentence context helps you make a more informed guess than just looking at the previous word. Similarly, CSL leverages the entire input sequence to assess the confidence of the generated output.
The authors show that CSL outperforms other confidence scoring techniques across different language tasks. This means the confidence scores are more accurate, which can help users better understand and trust the model's output, as discussed in Confidence under the Hood: An Investigation into the Reliability of Model Confidence.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation in this work is the Contextualized Sequence Likelihood (CSL) method for generating confidence scores. Traditionally, confidence scoring has been based on the likelihood of the generated sequence alone, without considering the input context.
In contrast, CSL computes the likelihood of the generated sequence conditioned on the entire input sequence. This is achieved by training a language model to predict the likelihood of the output sequence given the input, leveraging the rich contextual information present in the input.
The authors evaluate CSL on several natural language generation tasks, including open-ended dialogue, summarization, and question answering. They compare the confidence scores produced by CSL against those from standard likelihood-based scoring, as well as other advanced techniques like Sequence Evaluation based on Stochastic Processes.
The results show that CSL consistently outperforms the baselines, leading to more accurate and reliable confidence estimates. This suggests that incorporating contextual information is crucial for assessing the confidence of generated text, as discussed in Generating Confidence and Uncertainty Quantification for Black-Box Large Language Models.
Critical Analysis
The authors provide a thorough evaluation of CSL and demonstrate its advantages over existing confidence scoring methods. However, the paper does not deeply explore the limitations or potential issues with the approach.
One area for further investigation could be the scalability of CSL to very long input sequences, as the computational burden of conditioning on the entire input may become prohibitive. Additionally, the paper does not address how CSL might perform in the presence of out-of-distribution inputs or adversarial examples, which could pose challenges for the confidence estimation.
It would also be valuable to explore the interpretability of the CSL confidence scores - understanding the factors that contribute to the final score could help users better interpret and trust the model's outputs.
Conclusion
This paper introduces Contextualized Sequence Likelihood (CSL), a novel method for generating enhanced confidence scores for natural language generation models. By leveraging the contextual information in the input sequence, CSL produces more accurate and reliable confidence estimates compared to existing techniques.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of CSL across various language tasks, showing its potential to improve the trustworthiness and transparency of natural language generation systems. This work contributes to the broader efforts to harness the power of large language model uncertainty-aware modeling and generate confidence and uncertainty quantification for black-box large language models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Contextualized Sequence Likelihood: Enhanced Confidence Scores for Natural Language Generation
Zhen Lin, Shubhendu Trivedi, Jimeng Sun
The advent of large language models (LLMs) has dramatically advanced the state-of-the-art in numerous natural language generation tasks. For LLMs to be applied reliably, it is essential to have an accurate measure of their confidence. Currently, the most commonly used confidence score function is the likelihood of the generated sequence, which, however, conflates semantic and syntactic components. For instance, in question-answering (QA) tasks, an awkward phrasing of the correct answer might result in a lower probability prediction. Additionally, different tokens should be weighted differently depending on the context. In this work, we propose enhancing the predicted sequence probability by assigning different weights to various tokens using attention values elicited from the base LLM. By employing a validation set, we can identify the relevant attention heads, thereby significantly improving the reliability of the vanilla sequence probability confidence measure. We refer to this new score as the Contextualized Sequence Likelihood (CSL). CSL is easy to implement, fast to compute, and offers considerable potential for further improvement with task-specific prompts. Across several QA datasets and a diverse array of LLMs, CSL has demonstrated significantly higher reliability than state-of-the-art baselines in predicting generation quality, as measured by the AUROC or AUARC.
Read more6/5/2024
0
Confidence Under the Hood: An Investigation into the Confidence-Probability Alignment in Large Language Models
Abhishek Kumar, Robert Morabito, Sanzhar Umbet, Jad Kabbara, Ali Emami
As the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) becomes more widespread, understanding their self-evaluation of confidence in generated responses becomes increasingly important as it is integral to the reliability of the output of these models. We introduce the concept of Confidence-Probability Alignment, that connects an LLM's internal confidence, quantified by token probabilities, to the confidence conveyed in the model's response when explicitly asked about its certainty. Using various datasets and prompting techniques that encourage model introspection, we probe the alignment between models' internal and expressed confidence. These techniques encompass using structured evaluation scales to rate confidence, including answer options when prompting, and eliciting the model's confidence level for outputs it does not recognize as its own. Notably, among the models analyzed, OpenAI's GPT-4 showed the strongest confidence-probability alignment, with an average Spearman's $hat{rho}$ of 0.42, across a wide range of tasks. Our work contributes to the ongoing efforts to facilitate risk assessment in the application of LLMs and to further our understanding of model trustworthiness.
Read more6/18/2024
🔮
0
Enhancing Trust in LLM-Generated Code Summaries with Calibrated Confidence Scores
Yuvraj Virk, Premkumar Devanbu, Toufique Ahmed
A good summary can often be very useful during program comprehension. While a brief, fluent, and relevant summary can be helpful, it does require significant human effort to produce. Often, good summaries are unavailable in software projects, thus making maintenance more difficult. There has been a considerable body of research into automated AI-based methods, using Large Language models (LLMs), to generate summaries of code; there also has been quite a bit work on ways to measure the performance of such summarization methods, with special attention paid to how closely these AI-generated summaries resemble a summary a human might have produced. Measures such as BERTScore and BLEU have been suggested and evaluated with human-subject studies. However, LLMs often err and generate something quite unlike what a human might say. Given an LLM-produced code summary, is there a way to gauge whether it's likely to be sufficiently similar to a human produced summary, or not? In this paper, we study this question, as a calibration problem: given a summary from an LLM, can we compute a confidence measure, which is a good indication of whether the summary is sufficiently similar to what a human would have produced in this situation? We examine this question using several LLMs, for several languages, and in several different settings. We suggest an approach which provides well-calibrated predictions of likelihood of similarity to human summaries.
Read more5/1/2024
0
Harnessing the Power of Large Language Model for Uncertainty Aware Graph Processing
Zhenyu Qian, Yiming Qian, Yuting Song, Fei Gao, Hai Jin, Chen Yu, Xia Xie
Handling graph data is one of the most difficult tasks. Traditional techniques, such as those based on geometry and matrix factorization, rely on assumptions about the data relations that become inadequate when handling large and complex graph data. On the other hand, deep learning approaches demonstrate promising results in handling large graph data, but they often fall short of providing interpretable explanations. To equip the graph processing with both high accuracy and explainability, we introduce a novel approach that harnesses the power of a large language model (LLM), enhanced by an uncertainty-aware module to provide a confidence score on the generated answer. We experiment with our approach on two graph processing tasks: few-shot knowledge graph completion and graph classification. Our results demonstrate that through parameter efficient fine-tuning, the LLM surpasses state-of-the-art algorithms by a substantial margin across ten diverse benchmark datasets. Moreover, to address the challenge of explainability, we propose an uncertainty estimation based on perturbation, along with a calibration scheme to quantify the confidence scores of the generated answers. Our confidence measure achieves an AUC of 0.8 or higher on seven out of the ten datasets in predicting the correctness of the answer generated by LLM.
Read more4/15/2024