Continual Learning Under Language Shift
2311.01200
0
0
💬
Abstract
The recent increase in data and model scale for language model pre-training has led to huge training costs. In scenarios where new data become available over time, updating a model instead of fully retraining it would therefore provide significant gains. We study the pros and cons of updating a language model when new data comes from new languages -- the case of continual learning under language shift. Starting from a monolingual English language model, we incrementally add data from Danish, Icelandic, and Norwegian to investigate how forward and backward transfer effects depend on pre-training order and characteristics of languages, for three different model sizes. Our results show that, while forward transfer is largely positive and independent of language order, backward transfer can be positive or negative depending on the order and characteristics of new languages. We explore a number of potentially explanatory factors and find that a combination of language contamination and syntactic similarity best fits our results.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The rapid growth of data and model size for language models has led to massive training costs.
- Updating an existing model with new data can be more efficient than fully retraining it from scratch.
- This paper explores the pros and cons of continually updating a language model as new data from different languages becomes available.
Plain English Explanation
The recent explosion of data and the increasing size of language models have made training these models incredibly expensive. In situations where new data becomes available over time, it would be much more efficient to simply update the existing model rather than retraining it completely from the beginning.
This paper looks at what happens when you take a language model that was originally trained on English, and then incrementally add data from other languages like Danish, Icelandic, and Norwegian. The researchers wanted to understand how this "continual learning" process affects the model's performance, both on the original English tasks as well as the new languages.
Their results show that while the model generally benefits from learning the new languages (a positive "forward transfer" effect), the impact on the original English tasks can be either positive or negative depending on factors like the order the languages are introduced and how similar the new languages are to English. The researchers explore a few possible explanations for these findings, including the idea that introducing new languages can "contaminate" the model's understanding of the original language.
Overall, this work provides important insights into the challenges and tradeoffs involved in continually updating large language models as new data becomes available over time. It highlights the need to carefully manage this process to avoid unintended consequences.
Technical Explanation
The authors start with a pre-trained monolingual English language model, and then incrementally add data from Danish, Icelandic, and Norwegian to investigate how this "continual learning" process affects performance. They test three different model sizes to see how the results scale.
Their experiments show that forward transfer (improvements on the original English tasks) is generally positive and relatively independent of language order. However, backward transfer (changes in performance on the original English tasks) can be either positive or negative depending on the characteristics of the new languages and the order they are introduced.
The researchers explore several potential explanatory factors, including language contamination (where introducing new languages alters the model's understanding of the original language) and syntactic similarity between the languages. They find that a combination of these factors best explains the observed results.
The paper provides important insights into the challenges of continually updating large language models as new data becomes available over time. It highlights the need to carefully manage this process to avoid unintended consequences, and the importance of understanding how the characteristics of new languages interact with the original model.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed study of the continual learning process for language models, but there are a few areas that could be explored further:
-
The researchers only tested a limited set of languages (Danish, Icelandic, Norwegian). It would be valuable to see how the results scale to a broader range of languages, particularly those with very different linguistic structures from English.
-
The paper does not delve deeply into the specific mechanisms by which language contamination and syntactic similarity impact backward transfer. More research is needed to fully understand these phenomena.
-
The study is limited to incremental additions of new language data. It would be interesting to see how the results change if the model is instead fine-tuned on the new languages, or if the model is allowed to "forget" the original English tasks over time.
-
The paper does not address potential issues around fairness and inclusivity if continual learning leads to decreased performance on the original language tasks. This is an important consideration for real-world deployment of these models.
Overall, this is a well-executed study that provides valuable insights, but there is still room for further research to fully understand the nuances of continual learning for large language models.
Conclusion
This paper makes important contributions to our understanding of the challenges and tradeoffs involved in continually updating large language models as new data becomes available. The key findings are:
-
Forward transfer (improvements on the original language tasks) is generally positive and relatively independent of the order new languages are introduced.
-
Backward transfer (changes in performance on the original language tasks) can be either positive or negative, depending on factors like the characteristics of the new languages and the order they are added.
-
Language contamination and syntactic similarity appear to be the primary drivers of these backward transfer effects.
These insights highlight the need for careful management of the continual learning process for language models to avoid unintended consequences. Further research is needed to fully understand the underlying mechanisms and extend the findings to a broader range of languages and model update strategies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Improving Language Models Trained with Translated Data via Continual Pre-Training and Dictionary Learning Analysis
Sabri Boughorbel, MD Rizwan Parvez, Majd Hawasly
0
0
Training LLMs in low resources languages usually utilizes data augmentation with machine translation (MT) from English language. However, translation brings a number of challenges: there are large costs attached to translating and curating huge amounts of content with high-end machine translation solutions, the translated content carries over cultural biases, and if the translation is not faithful and accurate, the quality of the data degrades causing issues in the trained model. In this work we investigate the role of translation and synthetic data in training language models. We translate TinyStories, a dataset of 2.2M short stories for 3-4 year old children, from English to Arabic using the free NLLB-3B MT model. We train a number of story generation models of sizes 1M-33M parameters using this data. We identify a number of quality and task-specific issues in the resulting models. To rectify these issues, we further pre-train the models with a small dataset of synthesized high-quality stories, representing 1% of the original training data, using a capable LLM in Arabic. We show using GPT-4 as a judge and dictionary learning analysis from mechanistic interpretability that the suggested approach is a practical means to resolve some of the translation pitfalls. We illustrate the improvement through case studies of linguistic issues and cultural bias.
5/24/2024
💬
Continual Learning of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
Haizhou Shi, Zihao Xu, Hengyi Wang, Weiyi Qin, Wenyuan Wang, Yibin Wang, Hao Wang
0
0
The recent success of large language models (LLMs) trained on static, pre-collected, general datasets has sparked numerous research directions and applications. One such direction addresses the non-trivial challenge of integrating pre-trained LLMs into dynamic data distributions, task structures, and user preferences. Pre-trained LLMs, when tailored for specific needs, often experience significant performance degradation in previous knowledge domains -- a phenomenon known as catastrophic forgetting. While extensively studied in the continual learning (CL) community, it presents new manifestations in the realm of LLMs. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current research progress on LLMs within the context of CL. This survey is structured into four main sections: we first describe an overview of continually learning LLMs, consisting of two directions of continuity: vertical continuity (or vertical continual learning), i.e., continual adaptation from general to specific capabilities, and horizontal continuity (or horizontal continual learning), i.e., continual adaptation across time and domains (Section 3). We then summarize three stages of learning LLMs in the context of modern CL: Continual Pre-Training (CPT), Domain-Adaptive Pre-training (DAP), and Continual Fine-Tuning (CFT) (Section 4). Then we provide an overview of evaluation protocols for continual learning with LLMs, along with the current available data sources (Section 5). Finally, we discuss intriguing questions pertaining to continual learning for LLMs (Section 6). The full list of papers examined in this survey is available at https://github.com/Wang-ML-Lab/llm-continual-learning-survey.
4/26/2024
💬
LlamaTurk: Adapting Open-Source Generative Large Language Models for Low-Resource Language
Cagri Toraman
0
0
Despite advancements in English-dominant generative large language models, further development is needed for low-resource languages to enhance global accessibility. The primary methods for representing these languages are monolingual and multilingual pretraining. Monolingual pretraining is expensive due to hardware requirements, and multilingual models often have uneven performance across languages. This study explores an alternative solution by adapting large language models, primarily trained on English, to low-resource languages. We assess various strategies, including continual training, instruction fine-tuning, task-specific fine-tuning, and vocabulary extension. The results show that continual training improves language comprehension, as reflected in perplexity scores, and task-specific tuning generally enhances performance of downstream tasks. However, extending the vocabulary shows no substantial benefits. Additionally, while larger models improve task performance with few-shot tuning, multilingual models perform worse than their monolingual counterparts when adapted.
5/14/2024
🔄
Measuring Cross-lingual Transfer in Bytes
Leandro Rodrigues de Souza, Thales Sales Almeida, Roberto Lotufo, Rodrigo Nogueira
0
0
Multilingual pretraining has been a successful solution to the challenges posed by the lack of resources for languages. These models can transfer knowledge to target languages with minimal or no examples. Recent research suggests that monolingual models also have a similar capability, but the mechanisms behind this transfer remain unclear. Some studies have explored factors like language contamination and syntactic similarity. An emerging line of research suggests that the representations learned by language models contain two components: a language-specific and a language-agnostic component. The latter is responsible for transferring a more universal knowledge. However, there is a lack of comprehensive exploration of these properties across diverse target languages. To investigate this hypothesis, we conducted an experiment inspired by the work on the Scaling Laws for Transfer. We measured the amount of data transferred from a source language to a target language and found that models initialized from diverse languages perform similarly to a target language in a cross-lingual setting. This was surprising because the amount of data transferred to 10 diverse target languages, such as Spanish, Korean, and Finnish, was quite similar. We also found evidence that this transfer is not related to language contamination or language proximity, which strengthens the hypothesis that the model also relies on language-agnostic knowledge. Our experiments have opened up new possibilities for measuring how much data represents the language-agnostic representations learned during pretraining.
4/15/2024