Privacy Implications of Explainable AI in Data-Driven Systems
2406.15789
0
0
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) models, demonstrably powerful, suffer from a lack of interpretability. The absence of transparency, often referred to as the black box nature of ML models, undermines trust and urges the need for efforts to enhance their explainability. Explainable AI (XAI) techniques address this challenge by providing frameworks and methods to explain the internal decision-making processes of these complex models. Techniques like Counterfactual Explanations (CF) and Feature Importance play a crucial role in achieving this goal. Furthermore, high-quality and diverse data remains the foundational element for robust and trustworthy ML applications. In many applications, the data used to train ML and XAI explainers contain sensitive information. In this context, numerous privacy-preserving techniques can be employed to safeguard sensitive information in the data, such as differential privacy. Subsequently, a conflict between XAI and privacy solutions emerges due to their opposing goals. Since XAI techniques provide reasoning for the model behavior, they reveal information relative to ML models, such as their decision boundaries, the values of features, or the gradients of deep learning models when explanations are exposed to a third entity. Attackers can initiate privacy breaching attacks using these explanations, to perform model extraction, inference, and membership attacks. This dilemma underscores the challenge of finding the right equilibrium between understanding ML decision-making and safeguarding privacy.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the privacy implications of using explainable AI (XAI) in data-driven systems.
- XAI aims to make AI models more transparent and understandable, but this can also expose sensitive information about the data used to train the models.
- The paper examines the tradeoffs between the benefits of XAI and the potential privacy risks it introduces.
Plain English Explanation
Artificial intelligence (AI) is being used more and more to help make important decisions, from who gets a loan to what medical treatments to recommend. However, many AI systems are "black boxes" - it's not clear how they arrive at their decisions. Explainable AI (XAI) aims to make these AI systems more transparent and understandable, so people can see the reasoning behind the decisions.
While this transparency can be very helpful, it also raises some privacy concerns. The data used to train the AI models may contain sensitive information about individuals, and by explaining how the models work, that private data could potentially be exposed. This paper looks at this tradeoff - the benefits of having more explainable AI systems, versus the risks to people's privacy.
Technical Explanation
The paper first provides background on explainable AI (XAI) and its potential advantages, such as increased trust and accountability. However, the authors note that XAI can also lead to unintended privacy breaches. By revealing details about the AI model and the data it was trained on, sensitive information about individuals could be disclosed.
The paper then explores different types of privacy risks, such as membership inference attacks where an attacker can determine if a person's data was used to train the model. The authors also discuss how XAI explanations could potentially be used to reconstruct private training data.
To mitigate these privacy risks, the paper reviews various technical approaches, such as differential privacy and adversarial training. The authors also consider the societal implications of XAI and privacy, including the need for governance frameworks and user consent.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough overview of the privacy challenges posed by explainable AI systems. The authors carefully examine the tradeoffs between the benefits of increased transparency and the risks of exposing sensitive information.
However, the analysis could be strengthened by delving deeper into specific use cases and how the privacy risks might manifest in different domains. The paper also lacks a discussion of how end-users might perceive and respond to the privacy implications of XAI.
Additionally, the proposed mitigation strategies, while technically sound, could benefit from a more critical assessment of their practicality and effectiveness in real-world deployments of XAI systems.
Conclusion
This paper highlights an important and often overlooked aspect of the growing field of explainable AI. While XAI has the potential to make AI systems more transparent and trustworthy, it also introduces new privacy risks that must be carefully considered.
As AI continues to play a larger role in high-stakes decision-making, addressing the privacy implications of XAI will be crucial to ensuring these systems are deployed responsibly and with the appropriate safeguards in place. This research serves as an important first step in understanding and addressing this complex challenge.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔍
Distance-Restricted Explanations: Theoretical Underpinnings & Efficient Implementation
Yacine Izza, Xuanxiang Huang, Antonio Morgado, Jordi Planes, Alexey Ignatiev, Joao Marques-Silva
0
0
The uses of machine learning (ML) have snowballed in recent years. In many cases, ML models are highly complex, and their operation is beyond the understanding of human decision-makers. Nevertheless, some uses of ML models involve high-stakes and safety-critical applications. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) aims to help human decision-makers in understanding the operation of such complex ML models, thus eliciting trust in their operation. Unfortunately, the majority of past XAI work is based on informal approaches, that offer no guarantees of rigor. Unsurprisingly, there exists comprehensive experimental and theoretical evidence confirming that informal methods of XAI can provide human-decision makers with erroneous information. Logic-based XAI represents a rigorous approach to explainability; it is model-based and offers the strongest guarantees of rigor of computed explanations. However, a well-known drawback of logic-based XAI is the complexity of logic reasoning, especially for highly complex ML models. Recent work proposed distance-restricted explanations, i.e. explanations that are rigorous provided the distance to a given input is small enough. Distance-restricted explainability is tightly related with adversarial robustness, and it has been shown to scale for moderately complex ML models, but the number of inputs still represents a key limiting factor. This paper investigates novel algorithms for scaling up the performance of logic-based explainers when computing and enumerating ML model explanations with a large number of inputs.
5/15/2024
False Sense of Security in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Neo Christopher Chung, Hongkyou Chung, Hearim Lee, Lennart Brocki, Hongbeom Chung, George Dyer
0
0
A cautious interpretation of AI regulations and policy in the EU and the USA place explainability as a central deliverable of compliant AI systems. However, from a technical perspective, explainable AI (XAI) remains an elusive and complex target where even state of the art methods often reach erroneous, misleading, and incomplete explanations. Explainability has multiple meanings which are often used interchangeably, and there are an even greater number of XAI methods - none of which presents a clear edge. Indeed, there are multiple failure modes for each XAI method, which require application-specific development and continuous evaluation. In this paper, we analyze legislative and policy developments in the United States and the European Union, such as the Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence, the AI Act, the AI Liability Directive, and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) from a right to explanation perspective. We argue that these AI regulations and current market conditions threaten effective AI governance and safety because the objective of trustworthy, accountable, and transparent AI is intrinsically linked to the questionable ability of AI operators to provide meaningful explanations. Unless governments explicitly tackle the issue of explainability through clear legislative and policy statements that take into account technical realities, AI governance risks becoming a vacuous box-ticking exercise where scientific standards are replaced with legalistic thresholds, providing only a false sense of security in XAI.
6/14/2024
The future of human-centric eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is not post-hoc explanations
Vinitra Swamy, Jibril Frej, Tanja Kaser
0
0
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) plays a crucial role in enabling human understanding and trust in deep learning systems. As models get larger, more ubiquitous, and pervasive in aspects of daily life, explainability is necessary to minimize adverse effects of model mistakes. Unfortunately, current approaches in human-centric XAI (e.g. predictive tasks in healthcare, education, or personalized ads) tend to rely on a single post-hoc explainer, whereas recent work has identified systematic disagreement between post-hoc explainers when applied to the same instances of underlying black-box models. In this paper, we therefore present a call for action to address the limitations of current state-of-the-art explainers. We propose a shift from post-hoc explainability to designing interpretable neural network architectures. We identify five needs of human-centric XAI (real-time, accurate, actionable, human-interpretable, and consistent) and propose two schemes for interpretable-by-design neural network workflows (adaptive routing with InterpretCC and temporal diagnostics with I2MD). We postulate that the future of human-centric XAI is neither in explaining black-boxes nor in reverting to traditional, interpretable models, but in neural networks that are intrinsically interpretable.
5/29/2024
🤔
Logic-Based Explainability: Past, Present & Future
Joao Marques-Silva
0
0
In recent years, the impact of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) in society has been absolutely remarkable. This impact is expected to continue in the foreseeable future. However,the adoption of AI/ML is also a cause of grave concern. The operation of the most advances AI/ML models is often beyond the grasp of human decision makers. As a result, decisions that impact humans may not be understood and may lack rigorous validation. Explainable AI (XAI) is concerned with providing human decision-makers with understandable explanations for the predictions made by ML models. As a result, XAI is a cornerstone of trustworthy AI. Despite its strategic importance, most work on XAI lacks rigor, and so its use in high-risk or safety-critical domains serves to foster distrust instead of contributing to build much-needed trust. Logic-based XAI has recently emerged as a rigorous alternative to those other non-rigorous methods of XAI. This paper provides a technical survey of logic-based XAI, its origins, the current topics of research, and emerging future topics of research. The paper also highlights the many myths that pervade non-rigorous approaches for XAI.
6/19/2024