A Controlled Study on Long Context Extension and Generalization in LLMs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents a controlled study on the ability of large language models (LLMs) to extend and generalize from long context.
- Researchers evaluated how well LLMs perform on tasks that require understanding and reasoning about long-range dependencies in text.
- Findings suggest that current LLMs struggle to effectively leverage long-range context, highlighting limitations in their ability to capture and reason about complex, multi-faceted information.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how well large language models (LLMs) can understand and use long passages of text, rather than just short snippets. LLMs are AI systems trained on huge amounts of text data to generate human-like language.
The researchers designed experiments to test how LLMs perform on tasks that require understanding relationships and connections across long stretches of text. For example, they might give an LLM a long passage and ask it to summarize the key points or answer questions about the overall topic and storyline.
The results suggest that current LLMs struggle to effectively leverage this long-range context. They have difficulty capturing and reasoning about the complex, multi-faceted information contained in longer text. This points to limitations in the way these models process and represent knowledge, which could constrain their ability to truly understand and reason about language at a deeper level.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a series of controlled experiments designed to evaluate the ability of large language models (LLMs) to extend and generalize from long context. The researchers developed a set of benchmark tasks that required models to understand relationships and connections across long passages of text, going beyond the typical short-context setups.
Across multiple experiments, the team found that current LLMs exhibit significant challenges in effectively leveraging long-range context. Models struggled to maintain coherent understanding and reasoning as the length of the input text increased. This suggests fundamental limitations in the way these models process and represent knowledge, constraining their ability to capture the nuanced, multi-faceted information present in longer passages.
The results highlight the need for further research into techniques to extend the context capabilities of LLMs, moving beyond the current models' apparent limitations in long-context learning. Addressing these challenges could be crucial for developing LLMs that can truly understand and reason about language at a deeper level.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous, controlled investigation into an important limitation of current LLMs - their struggle to effectively leverage long-range context. The experimental design and analysis appear sound, and the findings align with other research highlighting the challenges of long-context learning for these models.
That said, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying reasons for this limitation. While it suggests that the models' knowledge representation and processing capabilities may be constraining factors, more work is needed to fully understand the mechanisms at play. Additionally, the paper does not propose or evaluate potential solutions to address this issue.
Further research could explore architectural modifications, training approaches, or other techniques that may enhance LLMs' ability to capture and reason about long-range dependencies in text. Investigating how humans excel at this type of comprehension could also yield valuable insights for improving model performance.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution by rigorously documenting an important limitation of LLMs, setting the stage for future work to tackle this challenge and advance the state of the art in natural language understanding.
Conclusion
This paper presents a controlled study that reveals significant limitations in the ability of current large language models to effectively leverage and reason about long-range context in text. The findings suggest that these models struggle to maintain coherent understanding and reasoning as the length of the input increases, pointing to fundamental constraints in their knowledge representation and processing capabilities.
Addressing these challenges could be crucial for developing LLMs that can truly understand and reason about language at a deeper level, with important implications for a wide range of natural language processing applications. The paper lays the groundwork for future research to explore architectural modifications, training approaches, and other techniques that may enhance LLMs' long-context capabilities, ultimately advancing the state of the art in natural language understanding.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Controlled Study on Long Context Extension and Generalization in LLMs
Yi Lu, Jing Nathan Yan, Songlin Yang, Justin T. Chiu, Siyu Ren, Fei Yuan, Wenting Zhao, Zhiyong Wu, Alexander M. Rush
Broad textual understanding and in-context learning require language models that utilize full document contexts. Due to the implementation challenges associated with directly training long-context models, many methods have been proposed for extending models to handle long contexts. However, owing to differences in data and model classes, it has been challenging to compare these approaches, leading to uncertainty as to how to evaluate long-context performance and whether it differs from standard evaluation. We implement a controlled protocol for extension methods with a standardized evaluation, utilizing consistent base models and extension data. Our study yields several insights into long-context behavior. First, we reaffirm the critical role of perplexity as a general-purpose performance indicator even in longer-context tasks. Second, we find that current approximate attention methods systematically underperform across long-context tasks. Finally, we confirm that exact fine-tuning based methods are generally effective within the range of their extension, whereas extrapolation remains challenging. All codebases, models, and checkpoints will be made available open-source, promoting transparency and facilitating further research in this critical area of AI development.
Read more9/24/2024
0
New!How to Train Long-Context Language Models (Effectively)
Tianyu Gao, Alexander Wettig, Howard Yen, Danqi Chen
We study continued training and supervised fine-tuning (SFT) of a language model (LM) to make effective use of long-context information. We first establish a reliable evaluation protocol to guide model development -- Instead of perplexity or simple needle-in-a-haystack (NIAH) tests, we use a broad set of long-context tasks, and we evaluate models after SFT with instruction data as this better reveals long-context abilities. Supported by our robust evaluations, we run thorough experiments to decide the data mix for continued pre-training, the instruction tuning dataset, and many other design choices. We find that (1) code repositories and books are excellent sources of long data, but it is crucial to combine them with high-quality short data; (2) training with a sequence length beyond the evaluation length boosts long-context performance; (3) for SFT, using only short instruction datasets yields strong performance on long-context tasks. Our final model, ProLong-8B, which is initialized from Llama-3 and trained on 40B tokens, demonstrates state-of-the-art long-context performance among similarly sized models at a length of 128K. ProLong outperforms Llama-3.18B-Instruct on the majority of long-context tasks despite having seen only 5% as many tokens during long-context training. Additionally, ProLong can effectively process up to 512K tokens, one of the longest context windows of publicly available LMs.
Read more10/4/2024
💬
0
LooGLE: Can Long-Context Language Models Understand Long Contexts?
Jiaqi Li, Mengmeng Wang, Zilong Zheng, Muhan Zhang
Large language models (LLMs), despite their impressive performance in various language tasks, are typically limited to processing texts within context-window size. This limitation has spurred significant research efforts to enhance LLMs' long-context understanding with high-quality long-sequence benchmarks. However, prior datasets in this regard suffer from shortcomings, such as short context length compared to the context window of modern LLMs; outdated documents that have data leakage problems; and an emphasis on short dependency tasks rather than long dependency tasks. In this paper, we present LooGLE, a Long Context Generic Language Evaluation benchmark for LLMs' long context understanding. LooGLE features relatively new documents post-2022, with over 24,000 tokens per document and 6,000 newly generated questions spanning diverse domains. Human annotators meticulously crafted more than 1,100 high-quality question-answer pairs to meet the long dependency requirements. These pairs underwent thorough cross-validation, yielding the most precise assessment of LLMs' long dependency capabilities. The evaluation of eight state-of-the-art LLMs on LooGLE revealed key findings: (i) commercial models outperformed open-sourced models; (ii) LLMs excelled in short dependency tasks like short question-answering and cloze tasks but struggled with more intricate long dependency tasks; (iii) in-context learning and chaining thoughts offered only marginal improvements; (iv) retrieval-based techniques demonstrated substantial benefits for short question-answering, while strategies for extending context window length had limited impact on long context understanding. As such, LooGLE not only provides a systematic and comprehensive evaluation schema on long-context LLMs, but also sheds light on future development of enhanced models towards true long-context understanding.
Read more9/9/2024
0
Long-context LLMs Struggle with Long In-context Learning
Tianle Li, Ge Zhang, Quy Duc Do, Xiang Yue, Wenhu Chen
Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant strides in handling long sequences. Some models like Gemini could even to be capable of dealing with millions of tokens. However, their performance evaluation has largely been confined to metrics like perplexity and synthetic tasks, which may not fully capture their true abilities in more challenging, real-world scenarios. We introduce a benchmark (LongICLBench) for long in-context learning in extreme-label classification using six datasets with 28 to 174 classes and input lengths from 2K to 50K tokens. Our benchmark requires LLMs to comprehend the entire input to recognize the massive label spaces to make correct predictions. We evaluate on 15 long-context LLMs and find that they perform well on less challenging classification tasks with smaller label space and shorter demonstrations. However, they struggle with more challenging task like Discovery with 174 labels, suggesting a gap in their ability to process long, context-rich sequences. Further analysis reveals a bias towards labels presented later in the sequence and a need for improved reasoning over multiple pieces of information. Our study reveals that long context understanding and reasoning is still a challenging task for the existing LLMs. We believe LongICLBench could serve as a more realistic evaluation for the future long-context LLMs.
Read more6/13/2024