Convergence Guarantees for RMSProp and Adam in Generalized-smooth Non-convex Optimization with Affine Noise Variance
2404.01436
0
0
🛠️
Abstract
This paper provides the first tight convergence analyses for RMSProp and Adam in non-convex optimization under the most relaxed assumptions of coordinate-wise generalized smoothness and affine noise variance. We first analyze RMSProp, which is a special case of Adam with adaptive learning rates but without first-order momentum. Specifically, to solve the challenges due to dependence among adaptive update, unbounded gradient estimate and Lipschitz constant, we demonstrate that the first-order term in the descent lemma converges and its denominator is upper bounded by a function of gradient norm. Based on this result, we show that RMSProp with proper hyperparameters converges to an $epsilon$-stationary point with an iteration complexity of $mathcal O(epsilon^{-4})$. We then generalize our analysis to Adam, where the additional challenge is due to a mismatch between the gradient and first-order momentum. We develop a new upper bound on the first-order term in the descent lemma, which is also a function of the gradient norm. We show that Adam with proper hyperparameters converges to an $epsilon$-stationary point with an iteration complexity of $mathcal O(epsilon^{-4})$. Our complexity results for both RMSProp and Adam match with the complexity lower bound established in cite{arjevani2023lower}.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides the first tight convergence analyses for two popular optimization algorithms, RMSProp and Adam, in non-convex settings.
- The analyses make the most relaxed assumptions about the optimization problem, including coordinate-wise generalized smoothness and affine noise variance.
- The paper demonstrates that both RMSProp and Adam can converge to an ε-stationary point with an iteration complexity of O(ε^-4), matching the established lower bound.
Plain English Explanation
Optimization algorithms are critical tools for training machine learning models, helping them learn patterns from data. RMSProp and Adam are two widely used optimization algorithms that adapt their update steps based on the historical gradients.
This paper provides a detailed mathematical analysis of how these algorithms behave when optimizing non-convex functions, which are common in modern machine learning. The researchers make very general assumptions about the optimization problem, allowing for a broad range of real-world applications.
The key insight is that the authors were able to derive tight upper bounds on the progress made by RMSProp and Adam in each iteration. This allows them to show that, with proper hyperparameter settings, both algorithms are guaranteed to converge to a point close to a stationary point (where the gradient is near zero) within a reasonable number of iterations. Importantly, the convergence rates they prove match the best-possible lower bounds, indicating the algorithms are performing nearly optimally.
These convergence guarantees provide valuable assurance about the reliability and predictability of these optimization methods, even in complex, non-convex settings. This can give machine learning practitioners greater confidence when using RMSProp and Adam to train their models.
Technical Explanation
The paper first analyzes RMSProp, which is a special case of the more general Adam algorithm. RMSProp uses adaptive per-coordinate learning rates but does not incorporate first-order momentum.
To prove convergence guarantees for RMSProp, the authors had to overcome several technical challenges. These included dealing with the dependencies between the adaptive updates, bounding the gradient estimates, and handling the Lipschitz constant of the objective function. By carefully analyzing the descent lemma, they were able to show that the first-order term converges and its denominator is upper bounded by a function of the gradient norm.
Building on this RMSProp analysis, the paper then tackles the more complex Adam algorithm. The key additional challenge is the mismatch between the gradient and the first-order momentum. The authors developed a new upper bound on the first-order term in the descent lemma, again as a function of the gradient norm.
Leveraging these technical results, the paper establishes that both RMSProp and Adam, with proper hyperparameter settings, can converge to an ε-stationary point with an iteration complexity of O(ε^-4). This matches the lower bound for non-convex optimization previously established in the literature.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes several important contributions by providing the first tight convergence analyses for RMSProp and Adam under very general assumptions. This significantly advances the theoretical understanding of these widely used optimization algorithms.
That said, the analyses rely on several technical conditions, such as coordinate-wise generalized smoothness and affine noise variance. While these are relatively broad assumptions, they may not hold in all practical optimization scenarios. The paper acknowledges this limitation and suggests exploring alternative models as future work.
Additionally, the convergence rates proven in the paper, while matching the lower bounds, are still relatively high-order (O(ε^-4)). This means that reaching high-accuracy solutions can require a large number of iterations, which may be impractical for some large-scale machine learning problems. Investigating techniques to further improve the convergence rates would be a valuable direction for future research.
Overall, this paper makes an important theoretical contribution by providing a comprehensive understanding of the convergence properties of RMSProp and Adam. The results can guide the principled use of these algorithms and inspire further advancements in optimization for machine learning.
Conclusion
This paper presents the first tight convergence analyses for the popular RMSProp and Adam optimization algorithms in non-convex settings. By making relatively mild assumptions about the optimization problem, the authors were able to derive guaranteed convergence rates that match the established lower bounds.
These theoretical guarantees can give machine learning practitioners greater confidence in using RMSProp and Adam to train their models, even in complex, non-convex scenarios. The insights from this work also open up avenues for further research into improving optimization algorithms and expanding their applicability to an even broader range of real-world problems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏅
Provable Adaptivity of Adam under Non-uniform Smoothness
Bohan Wang, Yushun Zhang, Huishuai Zhang, Qi Meng, Ruoyu Sun, Zhi-Ming Ma, Tie-Yan Liu, Zhi-Quan Luo, Wei Chen
0
0
Adam is widely adopted in practical applications due to its fast convergence. However, its theoretical analysis is still far from satisfactory. Existing convergence analyses for Adam rely on the bounded smoothness assumption, referred to as the emph{L-smooth condition}. Unfortunately, this assumption does not hold for many deep learning tasks. Moreover, we believe that this assumption obscures the true benefit of Adam, as the algorithm can adapt its update magnitude according to local smoothness. This important feature of Adam becomes irrelevant when assuming globally bounded smoothness. This paper studies the convergence of randomly reshuffled Adam (RR Adam) with diminishing learning rate, which is the major version of Adam adopted in deep learning tasks. We present the first convergence analysis of RR Adam without the bounded smoothness assumption. We demonstrate that RR Adam can maintain its convergence properties when smoothness is linearly bounded by the gradient norm, referred to as the emph{$(L_0, L_1)$-smooth condition. We further compare Adam to SGD when both methods use diminishing learning rate. We refine the existing lower bound of SGD and show that SGD can be slower than Adam. To our knowledge, this is the first time that Adam and SGD are rigorously compared in the same setting and the advantage of Adam is revealed.
6/26/2024
🛠️
On the Convergence of Adaptive Gradient Methods for Nonconvex Optimization
Dongruo Zhou, Jinghui Chen, Yuan Cao, Ziyan Yang, Quanquan Gu
0
0
Adaptive gradient methods are workhorses in deep learning. However, the convergence guarantees of adaptive gradient methods for nonconvex optimization have not been thoroughly studied. In this paper, we provide a fine-grained convergence analysis for a general class of adaptive gradient methods including AMSGrad, RMSProp and AdaGrad. For smooth nonconvex functions, we prove that adaptive gradient methods in expectation converge to a first-order stationary point. Our convergence rate is better than existing results for adaptive gradient methods in terms of dimension. In addition, we also prove high probability bounds on the convergence rates of AMSGrad, RMSProp as well as AdaGrad, which have not been established before. Our analyses shed light on better understanding the mechanism behind adaptive gradient methods in optimizing nonconvex objectives.
6/21/2024
⚙️
A Theoretical and Empirical Study on the Convergence of Adam with an Exact Constant Step Size in Non-Convex Settings
Alokendu Mazumder, Rishabh Sabharwal, Manan Tayal, Bhartendu Kumar, Punit Rathore
0
0
In neural network training, RMSProp and Adam remain widely favoured optimisation algorithms. One of the keys to their performance lies in selecting the correct step size, which can significantly influence their effectiveness. Additionally, questions about their theoretical convergence properties continue to be a subject of interest. In this paper, we theoretically analyse a constant step size version of Adam in the non-convex setting and discuss why it is important for the convergence of Adam to use a fixed step size. This work demonstrates the derivation and effective implementation of a constant step size for Adam, offering insights into its performance and efficiency in non convex optimisation scenarios. (i) First, we provide proof that these adaptive gradient algorithms are guaranteed to reach criticality for smooth non-convex objectives with constant step size, and we give bounds on the running time. Both deterministic and stochastic versions of Adam are analysed in this paper. We show sufficient conditions for the derived constant step size to achieve asymptotic convergence of the gradients to zero with minimal assumptions. Next, (ii) we design experiments to empirically study Adam's convergence with our proposed constant step size against stateof the art step size schedulers on classification tasks. Lastly, (iii) we also demonstrate that our derived constant step size has better abilities in reducing the gradient norms, and empirically, we show that despite the accumulation of a few past gradients, the key driver for convergence in Adam is the non-increasing step sizes.
4/5/2024
🔗
Convergence Analysis of Adaptive Gradient Methods under Refined Smoothness and Noise Assumptions
Devyani Maladkar, Ruichen Jiang, Aryan Mokhtari
0
0
Adaptive gradient methods are arguably the most successful optimization algorithms for neural network training. While it is well-known that adaptive gradient methods can achieve better dimensional dependence than stochastic gradient descent (SGD) under favorable geometry for stochastic convex optimization, the theoretical justification for their success in stochastic non-convex optimization remains elusive. In this paper, we aim to close this gap by analyzing the convergence rates of AdaGrad measured by the $ell_1$-norm of the gradient. Specifically, when the objective has $L$-Lipschitz gradient and the stochastic gradient variance is bounded by $sigma^2$, we prove a worst-case convergence rate of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{sqrt{d}L}{sqrt{T}} + frac{sqrt{d} sigma}{T^{1/4}})$, where $d$ is the dimension of the problem.We also present a lower bound of ${Omega}(frac{sqrt{d}}{sqrt{T}})$ for minimizing the gradient $ell_1$-norm in the deterministic setting, showing the tightness of our upper bound in the noiseless case. Moreover, under more fine-grained assumptions on the smoothness structure of the objective and the gradient noise and under favorable gradient $ell_1/ell_2$ geometry, we show that AdaGrad can potentially shave a factor of $sqrt{d}$ compared to SGD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result for adaptive gradient methods that demonstrates a provable gain over SGD in the non-convex setting.
6/10/2024