A Theoretical and Empirical Study on the Convergence of Adam with an Exact Constant Step Size in Non-Convex Settings
2309.08339
0
0
⚙️
Abstract
In neural network training, RMSProp and Adam remain widely favoured optimisation algorithms. One of the keys to their performance lies in selecting the correct step size, which can significantly influence their effectiveness. Additionally, questions about their theoretical convergence properties continue to be a subject of interest. In this paper, we theoretically analyse a constant step size version of Adam in the non-convex setting and discuss why it is important for the convergence of Adam to use a fixed step size. This work demonstrates the derivation and effective implementation of a constant step size for Adam, offering insights into its performance and efficiency in non convex optimisation scenarios. (i) First, we provide proof that these adaptive gradient algorithms are guaranteed to reach criticality for smooth non-convex objectives with constant step size, and we give bounds on the running time. Both deterministic and stochastic versions of Adam are analysed in this paper. We show sufficient conditions for the derived constant step size to achieve asymptotic convergence of the gradients to zero with minimal assumptions. Next, (ii) we design experiments to empirically study Adam's convergence with our proposed constant step size against stateof the art step size schedulers on classification tasks. Lastly, (iii) we also demonstrate that our derived constant step size has better abilities in reducing the gradient norms, and empirically, we show that despite the accumulation of a few past gradients, the key driver for convergence in Adam is the non-increasing step sizes.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Neural network training often uses RMSProp and Adam as preferred optimization algorithms.
- The performance of these algorithms depends heavily on selecting the right step size, which can significantly impact their effectiveness.
- Questions remain about the theoretical convergence properties of these algorithms, especially in non-convex settings.
Plain English Explanation
Optimization algorithms are the secret sauce that powers the training of neural networks, helping them learn from data to solve complex problems. Two of the most popular optimization algorithms are RMSProp and Adam.
The key to these algorithms' success lies in how they adjust the step size, or learning rate, during training. The step size determines how quickly the neural network updates its internal parameters to minimize the training error. If the step size is too large, the updates might overshoot the optimal values, causing the training to diverge. If the step size is too small, the training might progress too slowly.
RMSProp and Adam have built-in mechanisms to automatically adjust the step size based on the gradients (a measure of how the error changes with respect to each parameter). This adaptive step size can help the algorithms converge more quickly and effectively, especially on difficult, non-convex optimization problems.
However, there are still open questions about the theoretical guarantees of these adaptive algorithms, particularly when it comes to non-convex optimization. That's where this research paper comes in - the authors aim to provide a deeper understanding of how a constant step size version of Adam behaves in non-convex settings.
Technical Explanation
The key contributions of this paper are:
(i) Proving that adaptive gradient algorithms like Adam can converge to critical points (where the gradient is zero) in non-convex settings, even when using a constant step size. The authors provide bounds on the running time for both deterministic and stochastic versions of Adam.
(ii) Designing experiments to empirically study Adam's convergence with the proposed constant step size, comparing it to state-of-the-art step size scheduling methods on classification tasks.
(iii) Demonstrating that the proposed constant step size approach can better reduce gradient norms, and showing that the key driver for convergence in Adam is the non-increasing step sizes, rather than just the accumulation of past gradients.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a strong theoretical foundation for understanding the convergence properties of Adam with a constant step size in non-convex settings. This is an important contribution, as it helps address some of the open questions about the theoretical guarantees of these widely-used optimization algorithms.
One potential limitation is that the analysis is limited to smooth non-convex objectives. It would be interesting to see how the results extend to more general non-convex settings, or if there are any caveats or additional assumptions required.
Additionally, while the experimental results demonstrate the benefits of the constant step size approach, it would be valuable to explore a wider range of tasks and problem domains to further validate the findings.
Conclusion
This research paper offers valuable insights into the convergence behavior of the popular Adam optimization algorithm, particularly when using a constant step size in non-convex settings. The theoretical analysis and empirical studies provide a better understanding of how these adaptive gradient methods work, which can inform the development of more robust and efficient optimization techniques for training neural networks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🛠️
Convergence Guarantees for RMSProp and Adam in Generalized-smooth Non-convex Optimization with Affine Noise Variance
Qi Zhang, Yi Zhou, Shaofeng Zou
0
0
This paper provides the first tight convergence analyses for RMSProp and Adam in non-convex optimization under the most relaxed assumptions of coordinate-wise generalized smoothness and affine noise variance. We first analyze RMSProp, which is a special case of Adam with adaptive learning rates but without first-order momentum. Specifically, to solve the challenges due to dependence among adaptive update, unbounded gradient estimate and Lipschitz constant, we demonstrate that the first-order term in the descent lemma converges and its denominator is upper bounded by a function of gradient norm. Based on this result, we show that RMSProp with proper hyperparameters converges to an $epsilon$-stationary point with an iteration complexity of $mathcal O(epsilon^{-4})$. We then generalize our analysis to Adam, where the additional challenge is due to a mismatch between the gradient and first-order momentum. We develop a new upper bound on the first-order term in the descent lemma, which is also a function of the gradient norm. We show that Adam with proper hyperparameters converges to an $epsilon$-stationary point with an iteration complexity of $mathcal O(epsilon^{-4})$. Our complexity results for both RMSProp and Adam match with the complexity lower bound established in cite{arjevani2023lower}.
4/5/2024
🛠️
On the Convergence of Adaptive Gradient Methods for Nonconvex Optimization
Dongruo Zhou, Jinghui Chen, Yuan Cao, Ziyan Yang, Quanquan Gu
0
0
Adaptive gradient methods are workhorses in deep learning. However, the convergence guarantees of adaptive gradient methods for nonconvex optimization have not been thoroughly studied. In this paper, we provide a fine-grained convergence analysis for a general class of adaptive gradient methods including AMSGrad, RMSProp and AdaGrad. For smooth nonconvex functions, we prove that adaptive gradient methods in expectation converge to a first-order stationary point. Our convergence rate is better than existing results for adaptive gradient methods in terms of dimension. In addition, we also prove high probability bounds on the convergence rates of AMSGrad, RMSProp as well as AdaGrad, which have not been established before. Our analyses shed light on better understanding the mechanism behind adaptive gradient methods in optimizing nonconvex objectives.
6/21/2024
🏅
New!Provable Adaptivity of Adam under Non-uniform Smoothness
Bohan Wang, Yushun Zhang, Huishuai Zhang, Qi Meng, Ruoyu Sun, Zhi-Ming Ma, Tie-Yan Liu, Zhi-Quan Luo, Wei Chen
0
0
Adam is widely adopted in practical applications due to its fast convergence. However, its theoretical analysis is still far from satisfactory. Existing convergence analyses for Adam rely on the bounded smoothness assumption, referred to as the emph{L-smooth condition}. Unfortunately, this assumption does not hold for many deep learning tasks. Moreover, we believe that this assumption obscures the true benefit of Adam, as the algorithm can adapt its update magnitude according to local smoothness. This important feature of Adam becomes irrelevant when assuming globally bounded smoothness. This paper studies the convergence of randomly reshuffled Adam (RR Adam) with diminishing learning rate, which is the major version of Adam adopted in deep learning tasks. We present the first convergence analysis of RR Adam without the bounded smoothness assumption. We demonstrate that RR Adam can maintain its convergence properties when smoothness is linearly bounded by the gradient norm, referred to as the emph{$(L_0, L_1)$-smooth condition. We further compare Adam to SGD when both methods use diminishing learning rate. We refine the existing lower bound of SGD and show that SGD can be slower than Adam. To our knowledge, this is the first time that Adam and SGD are rigorously compared in the same setting and the advantage of Adam is revealed.
6/26/2024
🔮
On the Implicit Bias of Adam
Matias D. Cattaneo, Jason M. Klusowski, Boris Shigida
0
0
In previous literature, backward error analysis was used to find ordinary differential equations (ODEs) approximating the gradient descent trajectory. It was found that finite step sizes implicitly regularize solutions because terms appearing in the ODEs penalize the two-norm of the loss gradients. We prove that the existence of similar implicit regularization in RMSProp and Adam depends on their hyperparameters and the training stage, but with a different norm involved: the corresponding ODE terms either penalize the (perturbed) one-norm of the loss gradients or, conversely, impede its reduction (the latter case being typical). We also conduct numerical experiments and discuss how the proven facts can influence generalization.
6/18/2024