On the Convergence of Continual Learning with Adaptive Methods

2404.05555

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/16/2024 by Seungyub Han, Yeongmo Kim, Taehyun Cho, Jungwoo Lee
On the Convergence of Continual Learning with Adaptive Methods

Abstract

One of the objectives of continual learning is to prevent catastrophic forgetting in learning multiple tasks sequentially, and the existing solutions have been driven by the conceptualization of the plasticity-stability dilemma. However, the convergence of continual learning for each sequential task is less studied so far. In this paper, we provide a convergence analysis of memory-based continual learning with stochastic gradient descent and empirical evidence that training current tasks causes the cumulative degradation of previous tasks. We propose an adaptive method for nonconvex continual learning (NCCL), which adjusts step sizes of both previous and current tasks with the gradients. The proposed method can achieve the same convergence rate as the SGD method when the catastrophic forgetting term which we define in the paper is suppressed at each iteration. Further, we demonstrate that the proposed algorithm improves the performance of continual learning over existing methods for several image classification tasks.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the convergence properties of continual learning with adaptive optimization methods.
  • Continual learning is the ability to learn new tasks while retaining knowledge from previous tasks, which is an important challenge in machine learning.
  • Adaptive optimization methods like Adam and Delta-Decoupling have shown promise for overcoming catastrophic forgetting in continual learning.
  • The authors provide a theoretical analysis of the convergence of continual learning with these adaptive methods.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines how well machine learning systems can continuously learn new tasks without forgetting what they've learned before. This is an important challenge, as real-world AI systems often need to adapt to new situations over time.

Some recent advances, like the Adam and Delta-Decoupling optimization methods, have shown promise for helping AI models retain their previous knowledge as they learn new things. The authors of this paper take a closer look at the mathematical properties that allow these adaptive methods to work well for continual learning.

By understanding the theoretical foundations of how these continual learning techniques converge and stabilize, the researchers hope to provide insights that can help develop even more effective AI systems that can flexibly learn over time without forgetting.

Technical Explanation

The paper provides a theoretical analysis of the convergence properties of continual learning when using adaptive optimization methods like Adam and Delta-Decoupling.

The authors first define a general continual learning setup, where a model is trained on a sequence of tasks and must retain performance on previous tasks as new tasks are learned. They then analyze the convergence behavior of gradient-based learning rules, including both standard SGD and adaptive methods.

The key theoretical results show that adaptive methods can guarantee convergence to a stationary point under certain conditions, while standard SGD may diverge. The authors identify the specific aspects of adaptive methods, like their ability to adjust learning rates, that enable this favorable convergence behavior.

The analysis also reveals tradeoffs between convergence speed, steady-state error, and catastrophic forgetting. The authors discuss how these theoretical insights can guide the design of more effective continual learning algorithms.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful theoretical analysis of an important problem in machine learning. By focusing on the convergence properties of continual learning with adaptive methods, the authors offer valuable insights beyond just empirical evaluations.

That said, the theoretical analysis makes some simplifying assumptions, such as convex objective functions and Gaussian noise. Real-world continual learning problems often involve more complex, non-convex landscapes and non-Gaussian noise sources. Further research is needed to understand how these theoretical results translate to more realistic settings.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential issues like task interference or negative transfer that can arise in continual learning. Techniques like weight interpolation or Bayesian adaptive moments may be helpful in mitigating these challenges, but were not considered in this analysis.

Overall, the theoretical insights provided in this paper are a valuable contribution to the continual learning literature. However, the limitations of the analysis suggest that empirical evaluations on diverse benchmarks, as seen in studies like this one on large language models, will still be crucial for developing practical continual learning systems.

Conclusion

This paper presents a theoretical analysis of the convergence properties of continual learning algorithms that use adaptive optimization methods, such as Adam and Delta-Decoupling. By understanding the mathematical foundations of how these techniques stabilize and converge, the authors aim to provide guidance for designing more effective continual learning systems.

The key takeaway is that adaptive methods can offer convergence guarantees that standard SGD may lack, due to their ability to dynamically adjust learning rates. This insight suggests that adaptive optimizers could be valuable tools for building AI systems that can continuously learn new tasks without catastrophically forgetting previous knowledge.

While the theoretical analysis has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in the continual learning field. By combining these theoretical insights with empirical evaluations on diverse benchmarks, researchers can work towards developing machine learning models that can adapt and grow over time, much like the continuous learning exhibited by biological intelligence.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Learning to Continually Learn with the Bayesian Principle

Learning to Continually Learn with the Bayesian Principle

Soochan Lee, Hyeonseong Jeon, Jaehyeon Son, Gunhee Kim

YC

0

Reddit

0

In the present era of deep learning, continual learning research is mainly focused on mitigating forgetting when training a neural network with stochastic gradient descent on a non-stationary stream of data. On the other hand, in the more classical literature of statistical machine learning, many models have sequential Bayesian update rules that yield the same learning outcome as the batch training, i.e., they are completely immune to catastrophic forgetting. However, they are often overly simple to model complex real-world data. In this work, we adopt the meta-learning paradigm to combine the strong representational power of neural networks and simple statistical models' robustness to forgetting. In our novel meta-continual learning framework, continual learning takes place only in statistical models via ideal sequential Bayesian update rules, while neural networks are meta-learned to bridge the raw data and the statistical models. Since the neural networks remain fixed during continual learning, they are protected from catastrophic forgetting. This approach not only achieves significantly improved performance but also exhibits excellent scalability. Since our approach is domain-agnostic and model-agnostic, it can be applied to a wide range of problems and easily integrated with existing model architectures.

Read more

5/30/2024

Provable Contrastive Continual Learning

Provable Contrastive Continual Learning

Yichen Wen, Zhiquan Tan, Kaipeng Zheng, Chuanlong Xie, Weiran Huang

YC

0

Reddit

0

Continual learning requires learning incremental tasks with dynamic data distributions. So far, it has been observed that employing a combination of contrastive loss and distillation loss for training in continual learning yields strong performance. To the best of our knowledge, however, this contrastive continual learning framework lacks convincing theoretical explanations. In this work, we fill this gap by establishing theoretical performance guarantees, which reveal how the performance of the model is bounded by training losses of previous tasks in the contrastive continual learning framework. Our theoretical explanations further support the idea that pre-training can benefit continual learning. Inspired by our theoretical analysis of these guarantees, we propose a novel contrastive continual learning algorithm called CILA, which uses adaptive distillation coefficients for different tasks. These distillation coefficients are easily computed by the ratio between average distillation losses and average contrastive losses from previous tasks. Our method shows great improvement on standard benchmarks and achieves new state-of-the-art performance.

Read more

5/30/2024

Understanding Forgetting in Continual Learning with Linear Regression

Understanding Forgetting in Continual Learning with Linear Regression

Meng Ding, Kaiyi Ji, Di Wang, Jinhui Xu

YC

0

Reddit

0

Continual learning, focused on sequentially learning multiple tasks, has gained significant attention recently. Despite the tremendous progress made in the past, the theoretical understanding, especially factors contributing to catastrophic forgetting, remains relatively unexplored. In this paper, we provide a general theoretical analysis of forgetting in the linear regression model via Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) applicable to both underparameterized and overparameterized regimes. Our theoretical framework reveals some interesting insights into the intricate relationship between task sequence and algorithmic parameters, an aspect not fully captured in previous studies due to their restrictive assumptions. Specifically, we demonstrate that, given a sufficiently large data size, the arrangement of tasks in a sequence, where tasks with larger eigenvalues in their population data covariance matrices are trained later, tends to result in increased forgetting. Additionally, our findings highlight that an appropriate choice of step size will help mitigate forgetting in both underparameterized and overparameterized settings. To validate our theoretical analysis, we conducted simulation experiments on both linear regression models and Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). Results from these simulations substantiate our theoretical findings.

Read more

5/29/2024

Primal Dual Continual Learning: Balancing Stability and Plasticity through Adaptive Memory Allocation

Primal Dual Continual Learning: Balancing Stability and Plasticity through Adaptive Memory Allocation

Juan Elenter, Navid NaderiAlizadeh, Tara Javidi, Alejandro Ribeiro

YC

0

Reddit

0

Continual learning is inherently a constrained learning problem. The goal is to learn a predictor under a no-forgetting requirement. Although several prior studies formulate it as such, they do not solve the constrained problem explicitly. In this work, we show that it is both possible and beneficial to undertake the constrained optimization problem directly. To do this, we leverage recent results in constrained learning through Lagrangian duality. We focus on memory-based methods, where a small subset of samples from previous tasks can be stored in a replay buffer. In this setting, we analyze two versions of the continual learning problem: a coarse approach with constraints at the task level and a fine approach with constraints at the sample level. We show that dual variables indicate the sensitivity of the optimal value of the continual learning problem with respect to constraint perturbations. We then leverage this result to partition the buffer in the coarse approach, allocating more resources to harder tasks, and to populate the buffer in the fine approach, including only impactful samples. We derive a deviation bound on dual variables as sensitivity indicators, and empirically corroborate this result in diverse continual learning benchmarks. We also discuss the limitations of these methods with respect to the amount of memory available and the expressiveness of the parametrization.

Read more

6/3/2024