Provable Adaptivity of Adam under Non-uniform Smoothness
2208.09900
0
0
🏅
Abstract
Adam is widely adopted in practical applications due to its fast convergence. However, its theoretical analysis is still far from satisfactory. Existing convergence analyses for Adam rely on the bounded smoothness assumption, referred to as the emph{L-smooth condition}. Unfortunately, this assumption does not hold for many deep learning tasks. Moreover, we believe that this assumption obscures the true benefit of Adam, as the algorithm can adapt its update magnitude according to local smoothness. This important feature of Adam becomes irrelevant when assuming globally bounded smoothness. This paper studies the convergence of randomly reshuffled Adam (RR Adam) with diminishing learning rate, which is the major version of Adam adopted in deep learning tasks. We present the first convergence analysis of RR Adam without the bounded smoothness assumption. We demonstrate that RR Adam can maintain its convergence properties when smoothness is linearly bounded by the gradient norm, referred to as the emph{$(L_0, L_1)$-smooth condition. We further compare Adam to SGD when both methods use diminishing learning rate. We refine the existing lower bound of SGD and show that SGD can be slower than Adam. To our knowledge, this is the first time that Adam and SGD are rigorously compared in the same setting and the advantage of Adam is revealed.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper examines the convergence properties of the Adam optimization algorithm, which is widely used in deep learning applications.
- It focuses on the "randomly reshuffled Adam" (RR Adam) variant, which is the most common version of Adam used in practice.
- The paper provides the first convergence analysis of RR Adam without the commonly used "bounded smoothness" assumption, which may not hold for many deep learning tasks.
- It introduces a new, more relaxed smoothness condition and shows that RR Adam can maintain its convergence properties under this condition.
- The paper also compares Adam to Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) when both use a diminishing learning rate, and finds that Adam can be faster than SGD in certain settings.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at a popular optimization algorithm called Adam, which is widely used in deep learning. Adam is known for its fast convergence, but its theoretical properties haven't been fully understood.
One key assumption that previous analyses of Adam relied on was the "bounded smoothness" of the objective function. This means the function's curvature, or how much it changes, is bounded by a constant. Unfortunately, this assumption doesn't hold for many deep learning tasks.
The researchers in this paper study a version of Adam called "randomly reshuffled Adam" (RR Adam), which is the most common version used in practice. They provide the first analysis of RR Adam without the bounded smoothness assumption.
Instead, the paper introduces a new, more relaxed smoothness condition called the "(L0, L1)-smooth condition." This condition says the function's curvature is bounded by the gradient norm, rather than a constant. The researchers show that RR Adam can still converge well under this new condition.
The paper also compares Adam to another popular optimization algorithm, Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), when both use a decreasing learning rate over time. Surprisingly, the researchers find that Adam can actually converge faster than SGD in certain settings, which is the first time this advantage of Adam has been rigorously demonstrated.
Technical Explanation
The paper focuses on the convergence analysis of the Adam optimization algorithm and its randomly reshuffled variant, RR Adam, which is the major version adopted in deep learning tasks.
Previous convergence analyses of Adam relied on the "L-smooth condition," which assumes the objective function's curvature is bounded by a constant. However, as the paper notes, this assumption "[does] not hold for many deep learning tasks." The researchers argue that this assumption "obscures the true benefit of Adam," as the algorithm's ability to adapt its update magnitude based on local smoothness becomes irrelevant under global bounded smoothness.
To address this, the paper introduces the "(L0, L1)-smooth condition," which bounds the function's curvature by the gradient norm, rather than a constant. The researchers show that RR Adam can maintain its convergence properties under this new, more relaxed smoothness condition.
Additionally, the paper compares Adam to Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) when both methods use a diminishing learning rate. The researchers refine the existing lower bound of SGD and demonstrate that "[SGD] can be slower than Adam" in certain settings. This is the first time Adam and SGD have been rigorously compared in the same setting, revealing the advantage of Adam.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of Adam's convergence properties. By relaxing the commonly used bounded smoothness assumption, the researchers have uncovered new insights into the algorithm's behavior and its potential advantages over SGD.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations. For example, the "(L0, L1)-smooth condition" may still not hold for all deep learning tasks, and the researchers note that further investigation is needed to fully characterize the class of problems where the results hold.
Additionally, the paper focuses on the theoretical analysis of Adam's convergence, but does not provide a comprehensive empirical evaluation comparing Adam and SGD in real-world deep learning scenarios. While the theoretical results are promising, it would be helpful to see how they translate to practical performance.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the understanding of adaptive gradient methods like Adam and their convergence properties in nonconvex optimization. By challenging the traditional assumptions and providing new insights, the researchers have opened up avenues for further research on the optimization of deep learning models.
Conclusion
This paper presents a significant advancement in the theoretical understanding of the Adam optimization algorithm, which is widely used in practical deep learning applications. By relaxing the commonly assumed bounded smoothness condition and introducing a new, more general smoothness condition, the researchers have provided the first convergence analysis of the popular RR Adam variant without restrictive assumptions.
The paper also offers a surprising result, showing that Adam can actually converge faster than Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) when both methods use a diminishing learning rate. This is an important finding that challenges the conventional wisdom and sheds new light on the advantages of adaptive optimization methods like Adam.
Overall, this research contributes to a better understanding of the theoretical properties of Adam and other adaptive gradient algorithms, which can inform the design of more effective optimization strategies for deep learning and other areas of machine learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🛠️
Convergence Guarantees for RMSProp and Adam in Generalized-smooth Non-convex Optimization with Affine Noise Variance
Qi Zhang, Yi Zhou, Shaofeng Zou
0
0
This paper provides the first tight convergence analyses for RMSProp and Adam in non-convex optimization under the most relaxed assumptions of coordinate-wise generalized smoothness and affine noise variance. We first analyze RMSProp, which is a special case of Adam with adaptive learning rates but without first-order momentum. Specifically, to solve the challenges due to dependence among adaptive update, unbounded gradient estimate and Lipschitz constant, we demonstrate that the first-order term in the descent lemma converges and its denominator is upper bounded by a function of gradient norm. Based on this result, we show that RMSProp with proper hyperparameters converges to an $epsilon$-stationary point with an iteration complexity of $mathcal O(epsilon^{-4})$. We then generalize our analysis to Adam, where the additional challenge is due to a mismatch between the gradient and first-order momentum. We develop a new upper bound on the first-order term in the descent lemma, which is also a function of the gradient norm. We show that Adam with proper hyperparameters converges to an $epsilon$-stationary point with an iteration complexity of $mathcal O(epsilon^{-4})$. Our complexity results for both RMSProp and Adam match with the complexity lower bound established in cite{arjevani2023lower}.
4/5/2024
🔗
Convergence Analysis of Adaptive Gradient Methods under Refined Smoothness and Noise Assumptions
Devyani Maladkar, Ruichen Jiang, Aryan Mokhtari
0
0
Adaptive gradient methods are arguably the most successful optimization algorithms for neural network training. While it is well-known that adaptive gradient methods can achieve better dimensional dependence than stochastic gradient descent (SGD) under favorable geometry for stochastic convex optimization, the theoretical justification for their success in stochastic non-convex optimization remains elusive. In this paper, we aim to close this gap by analyzing the convergence rates of AdaGrad measured by the $ell_1$-norm of the gradient. Specifically, when the objective has $L$-Lipschitz gradient and the stochastic gradient variance is bounded by $sigma^2$, we prove a worst-case convergence rate of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{sqrt{d}L}{sqrt{T}} + frac{sqrt{d} sigma}{T^{1/4}})$, where $d$ is the dimension of the problem.We also present a lower bound of ${Omega}(frac{sqrt{d}}{sqrt{T}})$ for minimizing the gradient $ell_1$-norm in the deterministic setting, showing the tightness of our upper bound in the noiseless case. Moreover, under more fine-grained assumptions on the smoothness structure of the objective and the gradient noise and under favorable gradient $ell_1/ell_2$ geometry, we show that AdaGrad can potentially shave a factor of $sqrt{d}$ compared to SGD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result for adaptive gradient methods that demonstrates a provable gain over SGD in the non-convex setting.
6/10/2024
⚙️
A Theoretical and Empirical Study on the Convergence of Adam with an Exact Constant Step Size in Non-Convex Settings
Alokendu Mazumder, Rishabh Sabharwal, Manan Tayal, Bhartendu Kumar, Punit Rathore
0
0
In neural network training, RMSProp and Adam remain widely favoured optimisation algorithms. One of the keys to their performance lies in selecting the correct step size, which can significantly influence their effectiveness. Additionally, questions about their theoretical convergence properties continue to be a subject of interest. In this paper, we theoretically analyse a constant step size version of Adam in the non-convex setting and discuss why it is important for the convergence of Adam to use a fixed step size. This work demonstrates the derivation and effective implementation of a constant step size for Adam, offering insights into its performance and efficiency in non convex optimisation scenarios. (i) First, we provide proof that these adaptive gradient algorithms are guaranteed to reach criticality for smooth non-convex objectives with constant step size, and we give bounds on the running time. Both deterministic and stochastic versions of Adam are analysed in this paper. We show sufficient conditions for the derived constant step size to achieve asymptotic convergence of the gradients to zero with minimal assumptions. Next, (ii) we design experiments to empirically study Adam's convergence with our proposed constant step size against stateof the art step size schedulers on classification tasks. Lastly, (iii) we also demonstrate that our derived constant step size has better abilities in reducing the gradient norms, and empirically, we show that despite the accumulation of a few past gradients, the key driver for convergence in Adam is the non-increasing step sizes.
4/5/2024
🛠️
On the Convergence of Adaptive Gradient Methods for Nonconvex Optimization
Dongruo Zhou, Jinghui Chen, Yuan Cao, Ziyan Yang, Quanquan Gu
0
0
Adaptive gradient methods are workhorses in deep learning. However, the convergence guarantees of adaptive gradient methods for nonconvex optimization have not been thoroughly studied. In this paper, we provide a fine-grained convergence analysis for a general class of adaptive gradient methods including AMSGrad, RMSProp and AdaGrad. For smooth nonconvex functions, we prove that adaptive gradient methods in expectation converge to a first-order stationary point. Our convergence rate is better than existing results for adaptive gradient methods in terms of dimension. In addition, we also prove high probability bounds on the convergence rates of AMSGrad, RMSProp as well as AdaGrad, which have not been established before. Our analyses shed light on better understanding the mechanism behind adaptive gradient methods in optimizing nonconvex objectives.
6/21/2024