Convergence rates for the Adam optimizer
0
⚙️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) is the standard optimization method for training deep neural networks in AI systems.
- Accelerated and adaptive SGD variants, like the popular Adam optimizer, are commonly used in practice.
- It was an open problem to provide a convergence analysis for the Adam optimizer, even in simple quadratic optimization problems.
- This work solves this problem by establishing optimal convergence rates for the Adam optimizer in a wide range of stochastic optimization problems.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on the Adam optimizer, a popular variant of stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimization methods used to train deep neural networks in AI systems.
SGD is the standard technique, but in practice, more advanced "accelerated and adaptive" versions of SGD are often used, like the Adam optimizer. Despite Adam's widespread use, there was an unresolved question about whether it could be proven to converge optimally, even in simple optimization problems.
This work solves that problem by showing that the Adam optimizer does indeed converge at an optimal rate for a broad class of stochastic optimization problems, including simple quadratic problems. The key insight is that Adam converges to a specific "vector field" that differs from the negative gradient of the function being optimized. This explains why Adam may not always reach critical points of the objective function, but still converges efficiently.
Technical Explanation
The paper establishes optimal convergence rates for the Adam optimizer in a wide range of stochastic optimization problems. The key ingredient is the introduction of a new "Adam vector field" that accurately captures the macroscopic behavior of the Adam optimization process.
The analysis reveals that the Adam optimizer typically does not converge to critical points of the objective function (i.e., zeros of the gradient), but rather converges to zeros of this Adam vector field. This explains why Adam can be effective even when it does not reach the true minima of the objective function.
The paper provides a detailed theoretical treatment, covering the design of the Adam optimizer, the analysis of its convergence properties, and the comparison to the standard gradient descent method. The results show that Adam can achieve optimal convergence rates under mild assumptions on the stochastic optimization problem.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a rigorous and insightful analysis of the Adam optimizer, addressing an important open problem in the field. The authors have made a significant contribution by establishing the optimal convergence rates of Adam and providing a deeper understanding of its behavior.
One potential limitation is that the analysis is focused on idealized quadratic stochastic optimization problems, and it remains to be seen how well the findings extend to more complex, real-world optimization problems encountered in deep learning. Additionally, the paper does not address the potential impact of hyperparameter tuning on the practical performance of Adam.
Further research could explore the behavior of Adam in more realistic optimization scenarios, as well as investigate the tradeoffs and interactions between the different components of the Adam update rule. Comparing the performance of Adam to other adaptive gradient methods, such as RMSProp or AdaGrad, could also provide valuable insights.
Conclusion
This work solves a long-standing open problem by providing a comprehensive convergence analysis of the Adam optimizer, a popular variant of stochastic gradient descent used for training deep neural networks. The key insight is the introduction of the "Adam vector field," which explains why Adam may not converge to the critical points of the objective function, but still achieves optimal convergence rates. This understanding could lead to further improvements and applications of adaptive gradient methods in AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
⚙️
0
Convergence rates for the Adam optimizer
Steffen Dereich, Arnulf Jentzen
Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimization methods are nowadays the method of choice for the training of deep neural networks (DNNs) in artificial intelligence systems. In practically relevant training problems, usually not the plain vanilla standard SGD method is the employed optimization scheme but instead suitably accelerated and adaptive SGD optimization methods are applied. As of today, maybe the most popular variant of such accelerated and adaptive SGD optimization methods is the famous Adam optimizer proposed by Kingma & Ba in 2014. Despite the popularity of the Adam optimizer in implementations, it remained an open problem of research to provide a convergence analysis for the Adam optimizer even in the situation of simple quadratic stochastic optimization problems where the objective function (the function one intends to minimize) is strongly convex. In this work we solve this problem by establishing optimal convergence rates for the Adam optimizer for a large class of stochastic optimization problems, in particular, covering simple quadratic stochastic optimization problems. The key ingredient of our convergence analysis is a new vector field function which we propose to refer to as the Adam vector field. This Adam vector field accurately describes the macroscopic behaviour of the Adam optimization process but differs from the negative gradient of the objective function (the function we intend to minimize) of the considered stochastic optimization problem. In particular, our convergence analysis reveals that the Adam optimizer does typically not converge to critical points of the objective function (zeros of the gradient of the objective function) of the considered optimization problem but converges with rates to zeros of this Adam vector field.
Read more8/1/2024
🛠️
0
Non-convergence of Adam and other adaptive stochastic gradient descent optimization methods for non-vanishing learning rates
Steffen Dereich, Robin Graeber, Arnulf Jentzen
Deep learning algorithms - typically consisting of a class of deep neural networks trained by a stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimization method - are nowadays the key ingredients in many artificial intelligence (AI) systems and have revolutionized our ways of working and living in modern societies. For example, SGD methods are used to train powerful large language models (LLMs) such as versions of ChatGPT and Gemini, SGD methods are employed to create successful generative AI based text-to-image creation models such as Midjourney, DALL-E, and Stable Diffusion, but SGD methods are also used to train DNNs to approximately solve scientific models such as partial differential equation (PDE) models from physics and biology and optimal control and stopping problems from engineering. It is known that the plain vanilla standard SGD method fails to converge even in the situation of several convex optimization problems if the learning rates are bounded away from zero. However, in many practical relevant training scenarios, often not the plain vanilla standard SGD method but instead adaptive SGD methods such as the RMSprop and the Adam optimizers, in which the learning rates are modified adaptively during the training process, are employed. This naturally rises the question whether such adaptive optimizers, in which the learning rates are modified adaptively during the training process, do converge in the situation of non-vanishing learning rates. In this work we answer this question negatively by proving that adaptive SGD methods such as the popular Adam optimizer fail to converge to any possible random limit point if the learning rates are asymptotically bounded away from zero. In our proof of this non-convergence result we establish suitable pathwise a priori bounds for a class of accelerated and adaptive SGD methods, which are also of independent interest.
Read more7/12/2024
🛠️
0
Learning rate adaptive stochastic gradient descent optimization methods: numerical simulations for deep learning methods for partial differential equations and convergence analyses
Steffen Dereich, Arnulf Jentzen, Adrian Riekert
It is known that the standard stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimization method, as well as accelerated and adaptive SGD optimization methods such as the Adam optimizer fail to converge if the learning rates do not converge to zero (as, for example, in the situation of constant learning rates). Numerical simulations often use human-tuned deterministic learning rate schedules or small constant learning rates. The default learning rate schedules for SGD optimization methods in machine learning implementation frameworks such as TensorFlow and Pytorch are constant learning rates. In this work we propose and study a learning-rate-adaptive approach for SGD optimization methods in which the learning rate is adjusted based on empirical estimates for the values of the objective function of the considered optimization problem (the function that one intends to minimize). In particular, we propose a learning-rate-adaptive variant of the Adam optimizer and implement it in case of several neural network learning problems, particularly, in the context of deep learning approximation methods for partial differential equations such as deep Kolmogorov methods, physics-informed neural networks, and deep Ritz methods. In each of the presented learning problems the proposed learning-rate-adaptive variant of the Adam optimizer faster reduces the value of the objective function than the Adam optimizer with the default learning rate. For a simple class of quadratic minimization problems we also rigorously prove that a learning-rate-adaptive variant of the SGD optimization method converges to the minimizer of the considered minimization problem. Our convergence proof is based on an analysis of the laws of invariant measures of the SGD method as well as on a more general convergence analysis for SGD with random but predictable learning rates which we develop in this work.
Read more6/21/2024
🔗
0
Convergence Analysis of Adaptive Gradient Methods under Refined Smoothness and Noise Assumptions
Devyani Maladkar, Ruichen Jiang, Aryan Mokhtari
Adaptive gradient methods are arguably the most successful optimization algorithms for neural network training. While it is well-known that adaptive gradient methods can achieve better dimensional dependence than stochastic gradient descent (SGD) under favorable geometry for stochastic convex optimization, the theoretical justification for their success in stochastic non-convex optimization remains elusive. In this paper, we aim to close this gap by analyzing the convergence rates of AdaGrad measured by the $ell_1$-norm of the gradient. Specifically, when the objective has $L$-Lipschitz gradient and the stochastic gradient variance is bounded by $sigma^2$, we prove a worst-case convergence rate of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{sqrt{d}L}{sqrt{T}} + frac{sqrt{d} sigma}{T^{1/4}})$, where $d$ is the dimension of the problem.We also present a lower bound of ${Omega}(frac{sqrt{d}}{sqrt{T}})$ for minimizing the gradient $ell_1$-norm in the deterministic setting, showing the tightness of our upper bound in the noiseless case. Moreover, under more fine-grained assumptions on the smoothness structure of the objective and the gradient noise and under favorable gradient $ell_1/ell_2$ geometry, we show that AdaGrad can potentially shave a factor of $sqrt{d}$ compared to SGD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result for adaptive gradient methods that demonstrates a provable gain over SGD in the non-convex setting.
Read more6/10/2024