Non-convergence of Adam and other adaptive stochastic gradient descent optimization methods for non-vanishing learning rates
0
🛠️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Deep learning algorithms, particularly deep neural networks trained using stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimization, are widely used in artificial intelligence (AI) systems.
- SGD methods are employed to train large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Gemini, generative AI models for text-to-image creation like Midjourney, DALL-E, and Stable Diffusion, and deep neural networks (DNNs) to solve scientific and engineering problems.
- The plain vanilla SGD method may fail to converge even for some convex optimization problems if the learning rates are bounded away from zero.
- In practice, adaptive SGD methods like RMSprop and Adam, which modify the learning rates adaptively during training, are often used instead of the plain vanilla SGD.
- This raises the question of whether such adaptive optimizers can converge when the learning rates are non-vanishing.
Plain English Explanation
Deep learning algorithms, which are a type of artificial intelligence (AI) system, are now used in many important applications. These algorithms typically involve training a class of deep neural networks using a method called stochastic gradient descent (SGD).
SGD is used to train powerful large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Gemini, as well as successful generative AI models that can create images from text, such as Midjourney, DALL-E, and Stable Diffusion. SGD is also used to train deep neural networks to approximately solve scientific and engineering problems, like partial differential equations from physics and biology, and optimal control and stopping problems.
The standard, plain vanilla version of SGD can fail to converge even for some optimization problems that are relatively simple (known as "convex" problems) if the learning rates used in the optimization process are not allowed to gradually decrease to zero. In practice, however, researchers often use more advanced versions of SGD, called "adaptive" methods, such as RMSprop and Adam, where the learning rates are modified adaptively during the training process.
This raises the question of whether these adaptive optimizers can still converge when the learning rates are not allowed to go to zero. The research paper examines this question and provides a negative answer - it proves that adaptive SGD methods like the popular Adam optimizer fail to converge to any possible random limit point if the learning rates are asymptotically bounded away from zero.
Technical Explanation
The research paper establishes that adaptive SGD methods, such as the widely-used Adam optimizer, fail to converge when the learning rates are not allowed to decrease to zero over the course of training. This is an important result, as these adaptive methods are commonly employed in practice to train deep neural networks for a variety of applications.
The authors prove this non-convergence result by deriving suitable pathwise a priori bounds for a class of accelerated and adaptive SGD methods. These technical bounds are of independent interest and contribute to the broader understanding of the convergence properties of adaptive optimization algorithms.
The key insight is that the adaptive modification of the learning rates in algorithms like Adam can actually prevent convergence, in contrast to the standard SGD method, which is known to converge under appropriate conditions. The technical analysis explores the reasons behind this divergent behavior of adaptive methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the convergence properties of adaptive SGD methods, like Adam, when the learning rates are not allowed to decrease to zero. This is an important result, as these adaptive optimizers are widely used in practice to train deep learning models.
However, the paper's analysis is limited to the theoretical setting and does not consider the practical implications of this non-convergence result. In many real-world deep learning applications, the training process may terminate before the algorithm has a chance to diverge, or the non-convergence may not significantly impact the performance of the trained model.
Additionally, the paper does not explore potential modifications or alternative adaptive methods that may be able to overcome the convergence issues identified. Further research could investigate whether there are adaptive algorithms that can maintain the benefits of adaptive learning rates while still guaranteeing convergence under more realistic training conditions.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable theoretical contribution by proving the non-convergence of adaptive SGD methods under certain conditions, but the practical relevance and implications of this result merit further investigation and discussion.
Conclusion
This research paper has shown that popular adaptive stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimization methods, such as the widely-used Adam optimizer, fail to converge when the learning rates are not allowed to decrease to zero over the course of training. This is an important theoretical result, as these adaptive optimizers are commonly employed to train deep neural networks for a variety of artificial intelligence (AI) applications.
The paper's analysis establishes suitable pathwise a priori bounds for a class of accelerated and adaptive SGD methods, contributing to a deeper understanding of the convergence properties of these optimization algorithms. While the theoretical insights are valuable, the practical implications of this non-convergence result require further exploration, as the training process in many real-world deep learning scenarios may terminate before the algorithm has a chance to diverge.
Overall, this research highlights the need for continued investigation into the convergence and stability properties of optimization methods used in the training of deep learning models, which are the key ingredients powering many cutting-edge AI systems today.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🛠️
0
Non-convergence of Adam and other adaptive stochastic gradient descent optimization methods for non-vanishing learning rates
Steffen Dereich, Robin Graeber, Arnulf Jentzen
Deep learning algorithms - typically consisting of a class of deep neural networks trained by a stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimization method - are nowadays the key ingredients in many artificial intelligence (AI) systems and have revolutionized our ways of working and living in modern societies. For example, SGD methods are used to train powerful large language models (LLMs) such as versions of ChatGPT and Gemini, SGD methods are employed to create successful generative AI based text-to-image creation models such as Midjourney, DALL-E, and Stable Diffusion, but SGD methods are also used to train DNNs to approximately solve scientific models such as partial differential equation (PDE) models from physics and biology and optimal control and stopping problems from engineering. It is known that the plain vanilla standard SGD method fails to converge even in the situation of several convex optimization problems if the learning rates are bounded away from zero. However, in many practical relevant training scenarios, often not the plain vanilla standard SGD method but instead adaptive SGD methods such as the RMSprop and the Adam optimizers, in which the learning rates are modified adaptively during the training process, are employed. This naturally rises the question whether such adaptive optimizers, in which the learning rates are modified adaptively during the training process, do converge in the situation of non-vanishing learning rates. In this work we answer this question negatively by proving that adaptive SGD methods such as the popular Adam optimizer fail to converge to any possible random limit point if the learning rates are asymptotically bounded away from zero. In our proof of this non-convergence result we establish suitable pathwise a priori bounds for a class of accelerated and adaptive SGD methods, which are also of independent interest.
Read more7/12/2024
🛠️
0
Learning rate adaptive stochastic gradient descent optimization methods: numerical simulations for deep learning methods for partial differential equations and convergence analyses
Steffen Dereich, Arnulf Jentzen, Adrian Riekert
It is known that the standard stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimization method, as well as accelerated and adaptive SGD optimization methods such as the Adam optimizer fail to converge if the learning rates do not converge to zero (as, for example, in the situation of constant learning rates). Numerical simulations often use human-tuned deterministic learning rate schedules or small constant learning rates. The default learning rate schedules for SGD optimization methods in machine learning implementation frameworks such as TensorFlow and Pytorch are constant learning rates. In this work we propose and study a learning-rate-adaptive approach for SGD optimization methods in which the learning rate is adjusted based on empirical estimates for the values of the objective function of the considered optimization problem (the function that one intends to minimize). In particular, we propose a learning-rate-adaptive variant of the Adam optimizer and implement it in case of several neural network learning problems, particularly, in the context of deep learning approximation methods for partial differential equations such as deep Kolmogorov methods, physics-informed neural networks, and deep Ritz methods. In each of the presented learning problems the proposed learning-rate-adaptive variant of the Adam optimizer faster reduces the value of the objective function than the Adam optimizer with the default learning rate. For a simple class of quadratic minimization problems we also rigorously prove that a learning-rate-adaptive variant of the SGD optimization method converges to the minimizer of the considered minimization problem. Our convergence proof is based on an analysis of the laws of invariant measures of the SGD method as well as on a more general convergence analysis for SGD with random but predictable learning rates which we develop in this work.
Read more6/21/2024
⚙️
0
Convergence rates for the Adam optimizer
Steffen Dereich, Arnulf Jentzen
Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimization methods are nowadays the method of choice for the training of deep neural networks (DNNs) in artificial intelligence systems. In practically relevant training problems, usually not the plain vanilla standard SGD method is the employed optimization scheme but instead suitably accelerated and adaptive SGD optimization methods are applied. As of today, maybe the most popular variant of such accelerated and adaptive SGD optimization methods is the famous Adam optimizer proposed by Kingma & Ba in 2014. Despite the popularity of the Adam optimizer in implementations, it remained an open problem of research to provide a convergence analysis for the Adam optimizer even in the situation of simple quadratic stochastic optimization problems where the objective function (the function one intends to minimize) is strongly convex. In this work we solve this problem by establishing optimal convergence rates for the Adam optimizer for a large class of stochastic optimization problems, in particular, covering simple quadratic stochastic optimization problems. The key ingredient of our convergence analysis is a new vector field function which we propose to refer to as the Adam vector field. This Adam vector field accurately describes the macroscopic behaviour of the Adam optimization process but differs from the negative gradient of the objective function (the function we intend to minimize) of the considered stochastic optimization problem. In particular, our convergence analysis reveals that the Adam optimizer does typically not converge to critical points of the objective function (zeros of the gradient of the objective function) of the considered optimization problem but converges with rates to zeros of this Adam vector field.
Read more8/1/2024
🛠️
0
On the Convergence of Adaptive Gradient Methods for Nonconvex Optimization
Dongruo Zhou, Jinghui Chen, Yuan Cao, Ziyan Yang, Quanquan Gu
Adaptive gradient methods are workhorses in deep learning. However, the convergence guarantees of adaptive gradient methods for nonconvex optimization have not been thoroughly studied. In this paper, we provide a fine-grained convergence analysis for a general class of adaptive gradient methods including AMSGrad, RMSProp and AdaGrad. For smooth nonconvex functions, we prove that adaptive gradient methods in expectation converge to a first-order stationary point. Our convergence rate is better than existing results for adaptive gradient methods in terms of dimension. In addition, we also prove high probability bounds on the convergence rates of AMSGrad, RMSProp as well as AdaGrad, which have not been established before. Our analyses shed light on better understanding the mechanism behind adaptive gradient methods in optimizing nonconvex objectives.
Read more6/21/2024