Convergence of Unadjusted Langevin in High Dimensions: Delocalization of Bias
0
🤯
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper analyzes the convergence of the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm (ULA) in high-dimensional settings.
- It focuses on the delocalization of bias, where the bias can spread out across the high-dimensional space instead of being concentrated in a specific region.
- The research provides theoretical guarantees on the convergence rate of ULA and sheds light on how the bias behaves in high dimensions.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines a type of algorithm called the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm (ULA), which is used to sample from complex probability distributions. In high-dimensional settings, where there are many variables involved, the researchers found that the bias (or error) in the algorithm's output can become "delocalized" - instead of being concentrated in a specific region, it can spread out across the entire high-dimensional space.
This delocalization of bias is an important phenomenon to understand, as it can affect the algorithm's performance and the reliability of the results it produces. The paper provides mathematical analysis to quantify how fast the ULA algorithm converges, and how the bias behaves as the number of dimensions increases.
By understanding these properties, researchers and practitioners can better evaluate the suitability of the ULA algorithm for their high-dimensional problems and make more informed choices about which algorithms to use.
Technical Explanation
The paper focuses on the convergence rate and bias behavior of the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm (ULA) in high-dimensional settings. ULA is a popular algorithm for sampling from complex probability distributions, which is a fundamental task in machine learning and statistics.
The key finding is that the bias in ULA can exhibit a "delocalization" phenomenon in high dimensions. Instead of being concentrated in a specific region of the parameter space, the bias can spread out across the entire high-dimensional space. This is an important property to understand, as it can impact the reliability and interpretability of the algorithm's outputs.
The paper provides theoretical guarantees on the convergence rate of ULA and characterizes the behavior of the bias as the number of dimensions increases. This analysis sheds light on the strengths and limitations of ULA in high-dimensional problems, which is crucial for making informed choices about which algorithms to use in practice.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough theoretical analysis of the ULA algorithm's behavior in high dimensions, but does not explore any practical implications or applications of the findings. It would be valuable to see how the delocalization of bias manifests in real-world high-dimensional problems and how it affects the performance and interpretability of ULA-based methods.
Additionally, the paper does not compare ULA to other high-dimensional sampling algorithms, such as Hamiltonian Monte Carlo or Stein Variational Gradient Descent. Understanding the relative strengths and weaknesses of these methods in the context of delocalized bias would help practitioners choose the most appropriate algorithm for their specific needs.
Overall, the theoretical analysis in this paper is rigorous and contributes to our fundamental understanding of ULA, but more work is needed to translate these insights into practical guidance for applied machine learning and statistics.
Conclusion
This paper provides a detailed analysis of the convergence and bias properties of the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm in high-dimensional settings. The key finding is that the bias can exhibit a "delocalization" phenomenon, where it spreads out across the entire parameter space instead of being concentrated in a specific region.
This delocalization of bias is an important consideration for practitioners using ULA-based methods, as it can impact the reliability and interpretability of the algorithm's outputs. The theoretical guarantees and insights presented in the paper lay the groundwork for further research on the practical implications of these findings and how they compare to other high-dimensional sampling algorithms.
By understanding the behavior of ULA in high dimensions, researchers and practitioners can make more informed choices about which algorithms to use for their specific problems, leading to more robust and trustworthy results in machine learning and statistical analysis.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤯
0
Convergence of Unadjusted Langevin in High Dimensions: Delocalization of Bias
Yifan Chen, Xiaoou Cheng, Jonathan Niles-Weed, Jonathan Weare
The unadjusted Langevin algorithm is commonly used to sample probability distributions in extremely high-dimensional settings. However, existing analyses of the algorithm for strongly log-concave distributions suggest that, as the dimension $d$ of the problem increases, the number of iterations required to ensure convergence within a desired error in the $W_2$ metric scales in proportion to $d$ or $sqrt{d}$. In this paper, we argue that, despite this poor scaling of the $W_2$ error for the full set of variables, the behavior for a small number of variables can be significantly better: a number of iterations proportional to $K$, up to logarithmic terms in $d$, often suffices for the algorithm to converge to within a desired $W_2$ error for all $K$-marginals. We refer to this effect as delocalization of bias. We show that the delocalization effect does not hold universally and prove its validity for Gaussian distributions and strongly log-concave distributions with certain sparse interactions. Our analysis relies on a novel $W_{2,ell^infty}$ metric to measure convergence. A key technical challenge we address is the lack of a one-step contraction property in this metric. Finally, we use asymptotic arguments to explore potential generalizations of the delocalization effect beyond the Gaussian and sparse interactions setting.
Read more8/26/2024
0
Tamed Langevin sampling under weaker conditions
Iosif Lytras, Panayotis Mertikopoulos
Motivated by applications to deep learning which often fail standard Lipschitz smoothness requirements, we examine the problem of sampling from distributions that are not log-concave and are only weakly dissipative, with log-gradients allowed to grow superlinearly at infinity. In terms of structure, we only assume that the target distribution satisfies either a log-Sobolev or a Poincar'e inequality and a local Lipschitz smoothness assumption with modulus growing possibly polynomially at infinity. This set of assumptions greatly exceeds the operational limits of the vanilla unadjusted Langevin algorithm (ULA), making sampling from such distributions a highly involved affair. To account for this, we introduce a taming scheme which is tailored to the growth and decay properties of the target distribution, and we provide explicit non-asymptotic guarantees for the proposed sampler in terms of the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, total variation, and Wasserstein distance to the target distribution.
Read more5/29/2024
🗣️
0
On diffusion-based generative models and their error bounds: The log-concave case with full convergence estimates
Stefano Bruno, Ying Zhang, Dong-Young Lim, Omer Deniz Akyildiz, Sotirios Sabanis
We provide full theoretical guarantees for the convergence behaviour of diffusion-based generative models under the assumption of strongly log-concave data distributions while our approximating class of functions used for score estimation is made of Lipschitz continuous functions. We demonstrate via a motivating example, sampling from a Gaussian distribution with unknown mean, the powerfulness of our approach. In this case, explicit estimates are provided for the associated optimization problem, i.e. score approximation, while these are combined with the corresponding sampling estimates. As a result, we obtain the best known upper bound estimates in terms of key quantities of interest, such as the dimension and rates of convergence, for the Wasserstein-2 distance between the data distribution (Gaussian with unknown mean) and our sampling algorithm. Beyond the motivating example and in order to allow for the use of a diverse range of stochastic optimizers, we present our results using an $L^2$-accurate score estimation assumption, which crucially is formed under an expectation with respect to the stochastic optimizer and our novel auxiliary process that uses only known information. This approach yields the best known convergence rate for our sampling algorithm.
Read more4/23/2024
0
Learning Multi-Index Models with Neural Networks via Mean-Field Langevin Dynamics
Alireza Mousavi-Hosseini, Denny Wu, Murat A. Erdogdu
We study the problem of learning multi-index models in high-dimensions using a two-layer neural network trained with the mean-field Langevin algorithm. Under mild distributional assumptions on the data, we characterize the effective dimension $d_{mathrm{eff}}$ that controls both sample and computational complexity by utilizing the adaptivity of neural networks to latent low-dimensional structures. When the data exhibit such a structure, $d_{mathrm{eff}}$ can be significantly smaller than the ambient dimension. We prove that the sample complexity grows almost linearly with $d_{mathrm{eff}}$, bypassing the limitations of the information and generative exponents that appeared in recent analyses of gradient-based feature learning. On the other hand, the computational complexity may inevitably grow exponentially with $d_{mathrm{eff}}$ in the worst-case scenario. Motivated by improving computational complexity, we take the first steps towards polynomial time convergence of the mean-field Langevin algorithm by investigating a setting where the weights are constrained to be on a compact manifold with positive Ricci curvature, such as the hypersphere. There, we study assumptions under which polynomial time convergence is achievable, whereas similar assumptions in the Euclidean setting lead to exponential time complexity.
Read more8/15/2024