Conversation Disentanglement with Bi-Level Contrastive Learning

Overview

• Conversation disentanglement aims to group utterances into separate sessions within multi-party conversations.
• Existing methods have two main drawbacks:
  • Overemphasis on pairwise utterance relations, with inadequate attention to utterance-to-context modeling.
  • Requirement of a large amount of human-annotated training data, which is expensive to obtain.

Plain English Explanation

Conversation disentanglement is the process of organizing the different conversations happening within a larger multi-person discussion. Existing methods for this have struggled with two key problems:

1. They focus too much on how individual utterances (statements) are related to each other, without considering how each utterance relates to the overall context of the conversation. This makes it harder to accurately group the utterances into their proper conversation threads.

2. These methods require a lot of human-labeled training data, which can be very time-consuming and costly to obtain. This limits their practicality in real-world applications.

Technical Explanation

To address these issues, the researchers propose a new general disentanglement model based on a technique called "bi-level contrastive learning." This approach:

• Brings utterances from the same conversation session closer together in the representation space.
• Encourages each utterance to be near the "prototype" or central representation of its conversation session.

Importantly, this model can work in both supervised settings (with labeled training data) and unsupervised settings (without any labeled data). The researchers show that their method achieves new state-of-the-art performance on several public datasets, outperforming other recent approaches.

Critical Analysis

The paper does not delve into potential limitations or caveats of the proposed approach. One area for further research could be understanding how the model behaves on more noisy or complex real-world conversational data, beyond the curated public datasets used in the experiments.

Additionally, the paper does not provide much analysis on the interpretability or explainability of the learned representations and how they capture the underlying conversational structure. Examining these aspects could yield valuable insights.

Conclusion

This research presents an innovative bi-level contrastive learning approach to the important problem of conversation disentanglement. By better modeling the relationships between utterances and their broader conversational context, the proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance in both supervised and unsupervised settings. As conversational AI systems become more ubiquitous, advances in this area could have significant implications for improving the quality and coherence of multi-party dialogues.