Learning to Clarify: Multi-turn Conversations with Action-Based Contrastive Self-Training
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper presents a new approach called "Learning to Clarify" that enables multi-turn conversational agents to more effectively clarify ambiguous or incomplete information provided by users.
• The key innovation is the use of "action-based contrastive self-training," a technique that allows the model to learn how to identify clarification needs and generate appropriate clarifying responses by comparing its own generated outputs to a set of high-quality reference responses.
• The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several multi-turn conversation datasets, showing improved performance over existing methods in terms of clarification quality and overall conversation success.
Plain English Explanation
Imagine you're talking to a virtual assistant and you ask it a question, but your question is a bit unclear or doesn't have all the details the assistant needs to fully understand. A good assistant should recognize when it's missing information and politely ask you to clarify or provide more details. This paper describes a new technique that allows conversational AI systems to get better at identifying when they need more information and figuring out the right questions to ask to get that information.
The key idea is that the AI model compares its own responses to high-quality example responses, and uses that comparison to learn how to generate better clarifying questions. It's like the AI is practicing conversations and learning from its mistakes. Over time, this helps the model become more skilled at having natural, productive dialogues where it can identify gaps in its understanding and work with the user to fill those gaps.
The researchers tested this approach on different conversation datasets and showed it outperforms other methods at generating helpful clarifying responses. This is an important step towards building AI assistants that can engage in more natural, collaborative conversations with humans. By learning to actively clarify information, the AI can have more meaningful and productive exchanges.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new approach called "Learning to Clarify" that enables multi-turn conversational agents to more effectively identify and address ambiguities or missing information in user inputs. The core innovation is the use of "action-based contrastive self-training," a technique that allows the model to learn how to generate clarifying responses by comparing its own outputs to high-quality reference responses.
Specifically, the model is trained on a dataset of multi-turn conversations. During training, for each user input, the model generates a candidate clarifying response. This response is then compared to a set of reference clarifying responses, and the model is trained to minimize the difference between its output and the references.
This contrastive self-training process allows the model to learn which types of clarifying responses are effective, and how to identify situations where clarification is needed. The authors show that this approach outperforms previous methods on several multi-turn conversation benchmarks, demonstrating improved performance in terms of both clarification quality and overall conversation success.
The decision transformer architecture is used as the underlying conversational model, with the addition of the contrastive self-training component. The authors also explore techniques like automatic pair construction to expand the available set of reference clarifying responses during training.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach for enhancing the clarification abilities of conversational AI models. The use of contrastive self-training is a clever and effective technique for enabling the model to learn from its own generated outputs, rather than relying solely on human-provided examples.
One potential limitation is that the model's performance is still dependent on the quality of the reference clarifying responses used during training. If these references are not representative of high-quality clarification, the model may learn to mimic suboptimal behaviors. The authors acknowledge this and suggest techniques like automatic pair construction to expand the available references.
Additionally, the paper focuses on evaluating the model's clarification abilities in isolation, rather than in the context of a complete, end-to-end conversational system. It would be interesting to see how the "Learning to Clarify" approach performs when integrated with other dialogue management components, such as decision-oriented dialogue or techniques for aligning language models to handle ambiguity.
Overall, the paper presents a compelling and well-executed approach for enhancing the clarification abilities of conversational AI systems. The use of contrastive self-training is a promising direction, and the authors have demonstrated the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark datasets.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new technique called "Learning to Clarify" that enables multi-turn conversational agents to more effectively identify and address ambiguities or missing information in user inputs. The key innovation is the use of "action-based contrastive self-training," which allows the model to learn how to generate clarifying responses by comparing its own outputs to high-quality reference responses.
The authors demonstrate that this approach outperforms previous methods on several multi-turn conversation benchmarks, showing improved performance in terms of both clarification quality and overall conversation success. This work represents an important step towards building more natural, collaborative conversational AI systems that can engage in productive dialogues with users.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Learning to Clarify: Multi-turn Conversations with Action-Based Contrastive Self-Training
Maximillian Chen, Ruoxi Sun, Sercan O. Ar{i}k, Tomas Pfister
Large language models (LLMs) aligned through reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) have quickly become one of the dominant paradigms for building intelligent conversational assistant agents. However, despite their strong performance across many benchmarks, LLM-based agents still lack conversational skills such as disambiguation: when generalized assistants are faced with ambiguity, they often overhedge or implicitly guess users' ground-truth intents rather than asking clarification questions, and under task-specific settings, high-quality conversation samples are often limited, affecting models' ability to learn optimal dialogue action policies. We propose Action-Based Contrastive Self-Training (henceforth ACT), a quasi-online preference optimization algorithm based on Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) which allows for sample-efficient dialogue policy learning in multi-turn conversation. We demonstrate ACT's efficacy under sample-efficient conditions in three difficult conversational tasks: tabular-grounded question-answering, machine reading comprehension, and AmbigSQL, a novel task for disambiguating information-seeking requests for text-to-SQL generation. Additionally, we propose evaluating LLMs' ability to function as conversational agents by examining whether they can implicitly recognize and reason about ambiguity in conversation. ACT demonstrates substantial conversation modeling improvements over standard approaches to supervised fine-tuning and DPO.
Read more6/4/2024
0
Active Preference Learning for Large Language Models
William Muldrew, Peter Hayes, Mingtian Zhang, David Barber
As large language models (LLMs) become more capable, fine-tuning techniques for aligning with human intent are increasingly important. A key consideration for aligning these models is how to most effectively use human resources, or model resources in the case where LLMs themselves are used as oracles. Reinforcement learning from Human or AI preferences (RLHF/RLAIF) is the most prominent example of such a technique, but is complex and often unstable. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has recently been proposed as a simpler and more stable alternative. In this work, we develop an active learning strategy for DPO to make better use of preference labels. We propose a practical acquisition function for prompt/completion pairs based on the predictive entropy of the language model and a measure of certainty of the implicit preference model optimized by DPO. We demonstrate how our approach improves both the rate of learning and final performance of fine-tuning on pairwise preference data.
Read more7/1/2024
0
Dialogue Action Tokens: Steering Language Models in Goal-Directed Dialogue with a Multi-Turn Planner
Kenneth Li, Yiming Wang, Fernanda Vi'egas, Martin Wattenberg
We present an approach called Dialogue Action Tokens (DAT) that adapts language model agents to plan goal-directed dialogues. The core idea is to treat each utterance as an action, thereby converting dialogues into games where existing approaches such as reinforcement learning can be applied. Specifically, we freeze a pretrained language model and train a small planner model that predicts a continuous action vector, used for controlled generation in each round. This design avoids the problem of language degradation under reward optimization. When evaluated on the Sotopia platform for social simulations, the DAT-steered LLaMA model surpasses GPT-4's performance. We also apply DAT to steer an attacker language model in a novel multi-turn red-teaming setting, revealing a potential new attack surface.
Read more6/19/2024
0
Improving Conversational Abilities of Quantized Large Language Models via Direct Preference Alignment
Janghwan Lee, Seongmin Park, Sukjin Hong, Minsoo Kim, Du-Seong Chang, Jungwook Choi
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has facilitated their transformation into conversational chatbots that can grasp contextual nuances and generate pertinent sentences, closely mirroring human values through advanced techniques such as instruction tuning and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). However, the computational efficiency required for LLMs, achieved through techniques like post-training quantization (PTQ), presents challenges such as token-flipping that can impair chatbot performance. In response, we propose a novel preference alignment approach, quantization-aware direct preference optimization (QDPO), that aligns quantized LLMs with their full-precision counterparts, improving conversational abilities. Evaluated on two instruction-tuned LLMs in various languages, QDPO demonstrated superior performance in improving conversational abilities compared to established PTQ and knowledge-distillation fine-tuning techniques, marking a significant step forward in the development of efficient and effective conversational LLMs.
Read more7/19/2024