A Cost-Aware Approach to Adversarial Robustness in Neural Networks

Read original: arXiv:2409.07609 - Published 9/14/2024 by Charles Meyers, Mohammad Reza Saleh Sedghpour, Tommy Lofstedt, Erik Elmroth
Total Score

0

A Cost-Aware Approach to Adversarial Robustness in Neural Networks

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a cost-aware approach to improving the adversarial robustness of neural networks.
  • The key idea is to incorporate the cost of adversarial perturbations into the training process, in addition to the typical classification loss.
  • The authors demonstrate that this approach can achieve better trade-offs between accuracy and robustness compared to standard training methods.

Plain English Explanation

Neural networks, the powerful AI models that power many modern applications, are known to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks. These are small, carefully crafted changes to the input data that can cause the network to make incorrect predictions. Improving the adversarial robustness of neural networks is an important challenge.

This paper proposes a new training approach that takes into account the cost of the adversarial perturbations. The idea is that not all perturbations are equally undesirable - some may be more noticeable or disruptive than others. By incorporating this cost information into the training process, the network can learn to be more robust to the most harmful types of adversarial attacks.

The authors show that this cost-aware training approach can achieve better trade-offs between the accuracy of the network on normal inputs and its robustness to adversarial attacks, compared to standard training methods. This means the network can maintain high performance on regular data while also being more resistant to malicious tampering.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation of this work is the incorporation of an adversarial perturbation cost term into the training objective for neural networks. Typically, neural networks are trained to minimize a classification loss on normal, unperturbed data. The authors argue that this does not explicitly incentivize the network to be robust to adversarial attacks.

To address this, they propose adding a second term to the training loss that penalizes adversarial perturbations in proportion to their "cost." This cost can be defined based on different criteria, such as the magnitude of the perturbation or its visual salience. By minimizing both the classification loss and the adversarial cost, the network is encouraged to learn representations that are accurate on normal data while also being resilient to harmful perturbations.

The authors evaluate their cost-aware training approach on standard image classification benchmarks and find that it can achieve better trade-offs between accuracy and robustness compared to baseline training methods. They also analyze the types of adversarial perturbations that the cost-aware model is most resistant to, providing insights into how this training strategy shapes the learned representations.

Critical Analysis

The cost-aware training approach proposed in this paper is a promising step towards improving the real-world deployment of neural networks. By accounting for the severity of adversarial perturbations, it allows for a more nuanced optimization of the model's robustness.

However, the authors acknowledge that defining the appropriate cost function is a challenging problem that requires further research. The specific cost metrics used in this work, such as perturbation magnitude and visual salience, may not capture all the relevant factors that determine the harmfulness of an adversarial attack in a given application domain.

Additionally, the paper focuses on evaluating the approach on image classification tasks, but the applicability to other domains, such as semantic segmentation or natural language processing, remains to be explored. The trade-offs between accuracy and robustness may differ across tasks and problem settings.

Further research is needed to develop more sophisticated cost functions, understand the generalization of the approach to diverse applications, and study the long-term implications of cost-aware training on the robustness and reliability of AI systems.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel cost-aware approach to improving the adversarial robustness of neural networks. By incorporating the cost of adversarial perturbations into the training process, the authors demonstrate that it is possible to achieve better trade-offs between accuracy and robustness compared to standard training methods.

The proposed technique is a promising step towards developing more secure and reliable AI systems that can withstand malicious attacks. While further research is needed to refine the cost function and explore the broader applicability of the approach, this work contributes valuable insights to the field of adversarial robustness in neural networks.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

A Cost-Aware Approach to Adversarial Robustness in Neural Networks
Total Score

0

A Cost-Aware Approach to Adversarial Robustness in Neural Networks

Charles Meyers, Mohammad Reza Saleh Sedghpour, Tommy Lofstedt, Erik Elmroth

Considering the growing prominence of production-level AI and the threat of adversarial attacks that can evade a model at run-time, evaluating the robustness of models to these evasion attacks is of critical importance. Additionally, testing model changes likely means deploying the models to (e.g. a car or a medical imaging device), or a drone to see how it affects performance, making un-tested changes a public problem that reduces development speed, increases cost of development, and makes it difficult (if not impossible) to parse cause from effect. In this work, we used survival analysis as a cloud-native, time-efficient and precise method for predicting model performance in the presence of adversarial noise. For neural networks in particular, the relationships between the learning rate, batch size, training time, convergence time, and deployment cost are highly complex, so researchers generally rely on benchmark datasets to assess the ability of a model to generalize beyond the training data. To address this, we propose using accelerated failure time models to measure the effect of hardware choice, batch size, number of epochs, and test-set accuracy by using adversarial attacks to induce failures on a reference model architecture before deploying the model to the real world. We evaluate several GPU types and use the Tree Parzen Estimator to maximize model robustness and minimize model run-time simultaneously. This provides a way to evaluate the model and optimise it in a single step, while simultaneously allowing us to model the effect of model parameters on training time, prediction time, and accuracy. Using this technique, we demonstrate that newer, more-powerful hardware does decrease the training time, but with a monetary and power cost that far outpaces the marginal gains in accuracy.

Read more

9/14/2024

A Training Rate and Survival Heuristic for Inference and Robustness Evaluation (TRASHFIRE)
Total Score

0

A Training Rate and Survival Heuristic for Inference and Robustness Evaluation (TRASHFIRE)

Charles Meyers, Mohammad Reza Saleh Sedghpour, Tommy Lofstedt, Erik Elmroth

Machine learning models -- deep neural networks in particular -- have performed remarkably well on benchmark datasets across a wide variety of domains. However, the ease of finding adversarial counter-examples remains a persistent problem when training times are measured in hours or days and the time needed to find a successful adversarial counter-example is measured in seconds. Much work has gone into generating and defending against these adversarial counter-examples, however the relative costs of attacks and defences are rarely discussed. Additionally, machine learning research is almost entirely guided by test/train metrics, but these would require billions of samples to meet industry standards. The present work addresses the problem of understanding and predicting how particular model hyper-parameters influence the performance of a model in the presence of an adversary. The proposed approach uses survival models, worst-case examples, and a cost-aware analysis to precisely and accurately reject a particular model change during routine model training procedures rather than relying on real-world deployment, expensive formal verification methods, or accurate simulations of very complicated systems (textit{e.g.}, digitally recreating every part of a car or a plane). Through an evaluation of many pre-processing techniques, adversarial counter-examples, and neural network configurations, the conclusion is that deeper models do offer marginal gains in survival times compared to more shallow counterparts. However, we show that those gains are driven more by the model inference time than inherent robustness properties. Using the proposed methodology, we show that ResNet is hopelessly insecure against even the simplest of white box attacks.

Read more

9/14/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

A Survey of Neural Network Robustness Assessment in Image Recognition

Jie Wang, Jun Ai, Minyan Lu, Haoran Su, Dan Yu, Yutao Zhang, Junda Zhu, Jingyu Liu

In recent years, there has been significant attention given to the robustness assessment of neural networks. Robustness plays a critical role in ensuring reliable operation of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in complex and uncertain environments. Deep learning's robustness problem is particularly significant, highlighted by the discovery of adversarial attacks on image classification models. Researchers have dedicated efforts to evaluate robustness in diverse perturbation conditions for image recognition tasks. Robustness assessment encompasses two main techniques: robustness verification/ certification for deliberate adversarial attacks and robustness testing for random data corruptions. In this survey, we present a detailed examination of both adversarial robustness (AR) and corruption robustness (CR) in neural network assessment. Analyzing current research papers and standards, we provide an extensive overview of robustness assessment in image recognition. Three essential aspects are analyzed: concepts, metrics, and assessment methods. We investigate the perturbation metrics and range representations used to measure the degree of perturbations on images, as well as the robustness metrics specifically for the robustness conditions of classification models. The strengths and limitations of the existing methods are also discussed, and some potential directions for future research are provided.

Read more

4/16/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Towards Precise Observations of Neural Model Robustness in Classification

Wenchuan Mu, Kwan Hui Lim

In deep learning applications, robustness measures the ability of neural models that handle slight changes in input data, which could lead to potential safety hazards, especially in safety-critical applications. Pre-deployment assessment of model robustness is essential, but existing methods often suffer from either high costs or imprecise results. To enhance safety in real-world scenarios, metrics that effectively capture the model's robustness are needed. To address this issue, we compare the rigour and usage conditions of various assessment methods based on different definitions. Then, we propose a straightforward and practical metric utilizing hypothesis testing for probabilistic robustness and have integrated it into the TorchAttacks library. Through a comparative analysis of diverse robustness assessment methods, our approach contributes to a deeper understanding of model robustness in safety-critical applications.

Read more

4/26/2024