Evaluating the Adversarial Robustness of Semantic Segmentation: Trying Harder Pays Off

Read original: arXiv:2407.09150 - Published 7/15/2024 by Levente Halmosi, B'alint Mohos, M'ark Jelasity
Total Score

0

Evaluating the Adversarial Robustness of Semantic Segmentation: Trying Harder Pays Off

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper evaluates the adversarial robustness of semantic segmentation models, which are AI systems that can identify and label different objects and regions within an image.
  • The researchers tested the resilience of these models to adversarial attacks, which are carefully crafted inputs designed to trick the AI into making mistakes.
  • The key finding is that "trying harder" - using more sophisticated training techniques and model architectures - can significantly improve the adversarial robustness of semantic segmentation models.

Plain English Explanation

Semantic segmentation is a powerful AI technique that allows computers to analyze images and identify the different objects, people, and structures within them. These AI models have many useful applications, from self-driving cars that can detect pedestrians and obstacles, to medical imaging tools that can help diagnose diseases.

However, these models can also be vulnerable to adversarial attacks - small, carefully crafted changes to an image that can trick the AI into making mistakes. For example, an autonomous vehicle's semantic segmentation model might misclassify a stop sign as a speed limit sign if the image was slightly altered in a specific way.

In this paper, the researchers set out to understand how to make semantic segmentation models more resilient to these adversarial attacks. They experimented with different training techniques and model architectures to see which approaches could best defend against adversarial inputs.

The researchers found that by "trying harder" - using more advanced training methods and designing better model structures - they were able to significantly improve the adversarial robustness of semantic segmentation. This is an important breakthrough, as it means these AI systems can be made more reliable and trustworthy, which is crucial for safety-critical applications like self-driving cars and medical diagnosis.

Technical Explanation

The researchers in this paper evaluated the adversarial robustness of semantic segmentation models using a range of attack methods and defense techniques. They tested different model architectures and training approaches, including architectural modifications and advanced training regimes.

The key finding was that more sophisticated models and training procedures could significantly boost the adversarial robustness of semantic segmentation, as measured by metrics like mIoU (mean Intersection over Union) under attack. For example, the researchers found that using a stronger backbone network, larger input resolution, and iterative training with adversarial samples led to models that were much more resilient to adversarial attacks compared to standard segmentation architectures.

This research provides valuable insights into the factors that influence the adversarial robustness of semantic segmentation models. By understanding how to make these AI systems more resilient, the findings can help enable the safe and reliable deployment of semantic segmentation in safety-critical applications.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and rigorous evaluation of adversarial robustness for semantic segmentation models. The researchers used a diverse set of attack methods and architectures to stress-test the models, giving confidence in the generality of their findings.

However, the study is limited to a single dataset (Cityscapes) and a specific task (urban scene understanding). It would be valuable to see how these results translate to other semantic segmentation domains, such as medical imaging or robotic perception. Additionally, the paper does not explore the trade-offs between adversarial robustness and other model performance metrics, like standard segmentation accuracy.

Another potential area for further research is investigating the underlying mechanisms by which the proposed training and architectural enhancements improve adversarial robustness. A deeper understanding of these causal factors could lead to even more effective defenses against adversarial attacks.

Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the field of adversarial machine learning, demonstrating that with the right techniques, semantic segmentation models can be made significantly more resilient to malicious inputs. The findings are a promising step towards deploying these AI systems in safety-critical applications with greater confidence.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of the adversarial robustness of semantic segmentation models, a critical capability for many real-world AI applications. The key finding is that using more sophisticated training procedures and model architectures can substantially improve the resilience of these systems to adversarial attacks.

By understanding the factors that influence adversarial robustness, the research provides a roadmap for developing more reliable and trustworthy semantic segmentation models. This is an important advancement, as it can enable the safe deployment of these AI systems in safety-critical domains like autonomous vehicles, medical diagnosis, and robotic perception.

While further research is needed to explore the generalizability of these results and the underlying mechanisms at play, this paper represents a significant step forward in the field of adversarial machine learning. The insights gained can help pave the way for more robust and dependable AI that can be safely deployed in the real world.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Evaluating the Adversarial Robustness of Semantic Segmentation: Trying Harder Pays Off
Total Score

0

Evaluating the Adversarial Robustness of Semantic Segmentation: Trying Harder Pays Off

Levente Halmosi, B'alint Mohos, M'ark Jelasity

Machine learning models are vulnerable to tiny adversarial input perturbations optimized to cause a very large output error. To measure this vulnerability, we need reliable methods that can find such adversarial perturbations. For image classification models, evaluation methodologies have emerged that have stood the test of time. However, we argue that in the area of semantic segmentation, a good approximation of the sensitivity to adversarial perturbations requires significantly more effort than what is currently considered satisfactory. To support this claim, we re-evaluate a number of well-known robust segmentation models in an extensive empirical study. We propose new attacks and combine them with the strongest attacks available in the literature. We also analyze the sensitivity of the models in fine detail. The results indicate that most of the state-of-the-art models have a dramatically larger sensitivity to adversarial perturbations than previously reported. We also demonstrate a size-bias: small objects are often more easily attacked, even if the large objects are robust, a phenomenon not revealed by current evaluation metrics. Our results also demonstrate that a diverse set of strong attacks is necessary, because different models are often vulnerable to different attacks.

Read more

7/15/2024

Towards Reliable Evaluation and Fast Training of Robust Semantic Segmentation Models
Total Score

0

Towards Reliable Evaluation and Fast Training of Robust Semantic Segmentation Models

Francesco Croce, Naman D Singh, Matthias Hein

Adversarial robustness has been studied extensively in image classification, especially for the $ell_infty$-threat model, but significantly less so for related tasks such as object detection and semantic segmentation, where attacks turn out to be a much harder optimization problem than for image classification. We propose several problem-specific novel attacks minimizing different metrics in accuracy and mIoU. The ensemble of our attacks, SEA, shows that existing attacks severely overestimate the robustness of semantic segmentation models. Surprisingly, existing attempts of adversarial training for semantic segmentation models turn out to be weak or even completely non-robust. We investigate why previous adaptations of adversarial training to semantic segmentation failed and show how recently proposed robust ImageNet backbones can be used to obtain adversarially robust semantic segmentation models with up to six times less training time for PASCAL-VOC and the more challenging ADE20k. The associated code and robust models are available at https://github.com/nmndeep/robust-segmentation

Read more

7/17/2024

Detecting Adversarial Attacks in Semantic Segmentation via Uncertainty Estimation: A Deep Analysis
Total Score

0

Detecting Adversarial Attacks in Semantic Segmentation via Uncertainty Estimation: A Deep Analysis

Kira Maag, Roman Resner, Asja Fischer

Deep neural networks have demonstrated remarkable effectiveness across a wide range of tasks such as semantic segmentation. Nevertheless, these networks are vulnerable to adversarial attacks that add imperceptible perturbations to the input image, leading to false predictions. This vulnerability is particularly dangerous in safety-critical applications like automated driving. While adversarial examples and defense strategies are well-researched in the context of image classification, there is comparatively less research focused on semantic segmentation. Recently, we have proposed an uncertainty-based method for detecting adversarial attacks on neural networks for semantic segmentation. We observed that uncertainty, as measured by the entropy of the output distribution, behaves differently on clean versus adversely perturbed images, and we utilize this property to differentiate between the two. In this extended version of our work, we conduct a detailed analysis of uncertainty-based detection of adversarial attacks including a diverse set of adversarial attacks and various state-of-the-art neural networks. Our numerical experiments show the effectiveness of the proposed uncertainty-based detection method, which is lightweight and operates as a post-processing step, i.e., no model modifications or knowledge of the adversarial example generation process are required.

Read more

8/20/2024

🎲

Total Score

0

How adversarial attacks can disrupt seemingly stable accurate classifiers

Oliver J. Sutton, Qinghua Zhou, Ivan Y. Tyukin, Alexander N. Gorban, Alexander Bastounis, Desmond J. Higham

Adversarial attacks dramatically change the output of an otherwise accurate learning system using a seemingly inconsequential modification to a piece of input data. Paradoxically, empirical evidence indicates that even systems which are robust to large random perturbations of the input data remain susceptible to small, easily constructed, adversarial perturbations of their inputs. Here, we show that this may be seen as a fundamental feature of classifiers working with high dimensional input data. We introduce a simple generic and generalisable framework for which key behaviours observed in practical systems arise with high probability -- notably the simultaneous susceptibility of the (otherwise accurate) model to easily constructed adversarial attacks, and robustness to random perturbations of the input data. We confirm that the same phenomena are directly observed in practical neural networks trained on standard image classification problems, where even large additive random noise fails to trigger the adversarial instability of the network. A surprising takeaway is that even small margins separating a classifier's decision surface from training and testing data can hide adversarial susceptibility from being detected using randomly sampled perturbations. Counterintuitively, using additive noise during training or testing is therefore inefficient for eradicating or detecting adversarial examples, and more demanding adversarial training is required.

Read more

9/10/2024