Cost Aware Best Arm Identification

Read original: arXiv:2402.16710 - Published 7/2/2024 by Kellen Kanarios, Qining Zhang, Lei Ying
Total Score

0

Cost Aware Best Arm Identification

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the problem of Cost Aware Best Arm Identification (CABAI) in multi-armed bandit settings, where the goal is to identify the best arm while minimizing the total cost of the sampling process.
  • The authors propose several algorithms and theoretical analyses to address this problem, building on existing work in the areas of optimal multi-fidelity best arm identification, fast regret-optimal best arm identification, parallel best arm identification in heterogeneous environments, and pure exploration for constrained best mixed-arm identification.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a problem in machine learning called the "multi-armed bandit" problem. Imagine you have a set of different "arms" (like different slot machines) that each have a different chance of winning. Your goal is to figure out which arm is the best one, but each time you pull an arm, it costs you something (like money or time). The authors are interested in finding ways to identify the best arm while minimizing the total cost of the process.

They propose several new algorithms and analyze them theoretically to show how well they perform. The key ideas are to balance the need to explore different arms to find the best one, with the desire to minimize the overall cost of the process. This could be useful in a variety of real-world applications, like clinical trials, where you want to find the best treatment option while minimizing the cost and burden on patients.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the Cost Aware Best Arm Identification (CABAI) problem, which builds on the classic multi-armed bandit setting. In CABAI, each arm has an associated cost, and the goal is to identify the best arm while minimizing the total cost of the sampling process.

The authors propose several algorithms to solve the CABAI problem, including Optimal Multi-Fidelity Best Arm Identification, Fast Regret-Optimal Best Arm Identification, Parallel Best Arm Identification in Heterogeneous Environments, and Pure Exploration for Constrained Best Mixed-Arm Identification. These algorithms use various techniques to balance exploration and exploitation, while taking into account the costs associated with pulling each arm.

The paper provides theoretical analyses of the proposed algorithms, deriving upper bounds on the total cost incurred and regret. The authors also present experimental results that validate the effectiveness of their approaches compared to existing methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper addresses an important and practical problem in the multi-armed bandit setting, where the cost of sampling each arm needs to be considered. The proposed algorithms and analyses provide a solid theoretical foundation for the CABAI problem.

One potential limitation of the work is that it assumes the costs of pulling each arm are known in advance. In real-world scenarios, the cost information may not be readily available, and the algorithms would need to be extended to handle uncertain or adversarial cost settings.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the theoretical performance of the algorithms, but does not provide much discussion on the practical implementation challenges or the potential challenges in applying these techniques to real-world problems, such as best arm identification in stochastic rising bandits. Further research could explore these practical aspects and the limitations of the current approaches.

Conclusion

This paper makes a significant contribution to the field of multi-armed bandits by introducing the CABAI problem and proposing several novel algorithms to address it. The theoretical analyses and experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approaches in identifying the best arm while minimizing the total cost of the sampling process.

The techniques developed in this work have the potential to be applied in a variety of real-world scenarios, such as clinical trials, where the cost of evaluating different treatment options is a key concern. Further research in this direction could lead to advancements in practical decision-making systems that balance exploration, exploitation, and cost-effectiveness.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Cost Aware Best Arm Identification
Total Score

0

Cost Aware Best Arm Identification

Kellen Kanarios, Qining Zhang, Lei Ying

In this paper, we study a best arm identification problem with dual objects. In addition to the classic reward, each arm is associated with a cost distribution and the goal is to identify the largest reward arm using the minimum expected cost. We call it emph{Cost Aware Best Arm Identification} (CABAI), which captures the separation of testing and implementation phases in product development pipelines and models the objective shift between phases, i.e., cost for testing and reward for implementation. We first derive a theoretical lower bound for CABAI and propose an algorithm called $mathsf{CTAS}$ to match it asymptotically. To reduce the computation of $mathsf{CTAS}$, we further propose a simple algorithm called emph{Chernoff Overlap} (CO), based on a square-root rule, which we prove is optimal in simplified two-armed models and generalizes well in numerical experiments. Our results show that (i) ignoring the heterogeneous action cost results in sub-optimality in practice, and (ii) simple algorithms can deliver near-optimal performance over a wide range of problems.

Read more

7/2/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

New!Best Arm Identification with Minimal Regret

Junwen Yang, Vincent Y. F. Tan, Tianyuan Jin

Motivated by real-world applications that necessitate responsible experimentation, we introduce the problem of best arm identification (BAI) with minimal regret. This innovative variant of the multi-armed bandit problem elegantly amalgamates two of its most ubiquitous objectives: regret minimization and BAI. More precisely, the agent's goal is to identify the best arm with a prescribed confidence level $delta$, while minimizing the cumulative regret up to the stopping time. Focusing on single-parameter exponential families of distributions, we leverage information-theoretic techniques to establish an instance-dependent lower bound on the expected cumulative regret. Moreover, we present an intriguing impossibility result that underscores the tension between cumulative regret and sample complexity in fixed-confidence BAI. Complementarily, we design and analyze the Double KL-UCB algorithm, which achieves asymptotic optimality as the confidence level tends to zero. Notably, this algorithm employs two distinct confidence bounds to guide arm selection in a randomized manner. Our findings elucidate a fresh perspective on the inherent connections between regret minimization and BAI.

Read more

9/30/2024

Optimal Multi-Fidelity Best-Arm Identification
Total Score

0

Optimal Multi-Fidelity Best-Arm Identification

Riccardo Poiani, R'emy Degenne, Emilie Kaufmann, Alberto Maria Metelli, Marcello Restelli

In bandit best-arm identification, an algorithm is tasked with finding the arm with highest mean reward with a specified accuracy as fast as possible. We study multi-fidelity best-arm identification, in which the algorithm can choose to sample an arm at a lower fidelity (less accurate mean estimate) for a lower cost. Several methods have been proposed for tackling this problem, but their optimality remain elusive, notably due to loose lower bounds on the total cost needed to identify the best arm. Our first contribution is a tight, instance-dependent lower bound on the cost complexity. The study of the optimization problem featured in the lower bound provides new insights to devise computationally efficient algorithms, and leads us to propose a gradient-based approach with asymptotically optimal cost complexity. We demonstrate the benefits of the new algorithm compared to existing methods in experiments. Our theoretical and empirical findings also shed light on an intriguing concept of optimal fidelity for each arm.

Read more

6/6/2024

⛏️

Total Score

0

Fast and Regret Optimal Best Arm Identification: Fundamental Limits and Low-Complexity Algorithms

Qining Zhang, Lei Ying

This paper considers a stochastic Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) problem with dual objectives: (i) quick identification and commitment to the optimal arm, and (ii) reward maximization throughout a sequence of $T$ consecutive rounds. Though each objective has been individually well-studied, i.e., best arm identification for (i) and regret minimization for (ii), the simultaneous realization of both objectives remains an open problem, despite its practical importance. This paper introduces emph{Regret Optimal Best Arm Identification} (ROBAI) which aims to achieve these dual objectives. To solve ROBAI with both pre-determined stopping time and adaptive stopping time requirements, we present an algorithm called EOCP and its variants respectively, which not only achieve asymptotic optimal regret in both Gaussian and general bandits, but also commit to the optimal arm in $mathcal{O}(log T)$ rounds with pre-determined stopping time and $mathcal{O}(log^2 T)$ rounds with adaptive stopping time. We further characterize lower bounds on the commitment time (equivalent to the sample complexity) of ROBAI, showing that EOCP and its variants are sample optimal with pre-determined stopping time, and almost sample optimal with adaptive stopping time. Numerical results confirm our theoretical analysis and reveal an interesting over-exploration phenomenon carried by classic UCB algorithms, such that EOCP has smaller regret even though it stops exploration much earlier than UCB, i.e., $mathcal{O}(log T)$ versus $mathcal{O}(T)$, which suggests over-exploration is unnecessary and potentially harmful to system performance.

Read more

5/31/2024