Counterfactual Explanations with Probabilistic Guarantees on their Robustness to Model Change
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents a method for generating counterfactual explanations with probabilistic guarantees on their robustness to model change.
- Counterfactual explanations show how an input must be changed to obtain a different model output, providing insights into model behavior.
- The proposed approach ensures these counterfactual explanations remain valid even if the underlying model is modified.
Plain English Explanation
Imagine you have a machine learning model that makes decisions, like whether to approve a loan application. Counterfactual explanations are a way to understand how this model works by showing what changes would be needed to get a different outcome - for example, if the applicant had a higher income, they might be approved.
The key challenge is that machine learning models can change over time, as the data or algorithms are updated. This means the counterfactual explanations may no longer be valid. The paper introduces a new method to generate counterfactual explanations that remain reliable even if the underlying model changes.
The approach provides probabilistic guarantees on the robustness of the counterfactual explanations. This means you can be confident the explanations will still be accurate, even if small updates are made to the model. This is important for building trust in AI systems and ensuring their explanations remain meaningful over time.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a framework for generating robust counterfactual explanations - explanations of how an input must be changed to obtain a different model output, which remain valid even if the underlying model is modified.
The key technical contributions are:
- A probabilistic model that captures the uncertainty in the counterfactual explanation under potential model changes.
- An optimization procedure to find counterfactual explanations that maximize the probability of remaining valid.
- Theoretical guarantees on the robustness of the counterfactual explanations to model changes, quantified in terms of probability.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on both synthetic and real-world datasets, showing that the generated counterfactual explanations are more robust compared to existing methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes an important contribution by addressing the critical issue of model change, which can undermine the reliability of counterfactual explanations over time. The probabilistic guarantees provided by the proposed method are a valuable step towards building trust in AI systems.
However, the paper does not fully explore the potential limitations of the approach. For example, the robustness guarantees may depend on the specific type and magnitude of model changes, which are not extensively analyzed. Additionally, the computational complexity of the optimization procedure may limit its scalability to large-scale models.
Further research could investigate the generalization of the approach to other types of model changes, such as changes in model architecture or training data. Exploring the practical implications and potential trade-offs of the robustness guarantees would also be a valuable direction for future work.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel framework for generating counterfactual explanations with probabilistic guarantees on their robustness to model changes. By ensuring the explanations remain valid even as the underlying model is updated, the approach helps build trust and transparency in AI systems. While the paper makes an important contribution, further research is needed to fully understand the strengths, limitations, and practical implications of this approach.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Counterfactual Explanations with Probabilistic Guarantees on their Robustness to Model Change
Ignacy Stk{e}pka, Mateusz Lango, Jerzy Stefanowski
Counterfactual explanations (CFEs) guide users on how to adjust inputs to machine learning models to achieve desired outputs. While existing research primarily addresses static scenarios, real-world applications often involve data or model changes, potentially invalidating previously generated CFEs and rendering user-induced input changes ineffective. Current methods addressing this issue often support only specific models or change types, require extensive hyperparameter tuning, or fail to provide probabilistic guarantees on CFE robustness to model changes. This paper proposes a novel approach for generating CFEs that provides probabilistic guarantees for any model and change type, while offering interpretable and easy-to-select hyperparameters. We establish a theoretical framework for probabilistically defining robustness to model change and demonstrate how our BetaRCE method directly stems from it. BetaRCE is a post-hoc method applied alongside a chosen base CFE generation method to enhance the quality of the explanation beyond robustness. It facilitates a transition from the base explanation to a more robust one with user-adjusted probability bounds. Through experimental comparisons with baselines, we show that BetaRCE yields robust, most plausible, and closest to baseline counterfactual explanations.
Read more8/12/2024
0
Generally-Occurring Model Change for Robust Counterfactual Explanations
Ao Xu, Tieru Wu
With the increasing impact of algorithmic decision-making on human lives, the interpretability of models has become a critical issue in machine learning. Counterfactual explanation is an important method in the field of interpretable machine learning, which can not only help users understand why machine learning models make specific decisions, but also help users understand how to change these decisions. Naturally, it is an important task to study the robustness of counterfactual explanation generation algorithms to model changes. Previous literature has proposed the concept of Naturally-Occurring Model Change, which has given us a deeper understanding of robustness to model change. In this paper, we first further generalize the concept of Naturally-Occurring Model Change, proposing a more general concept of model parameter changes, Generally-Occurring Model Change, which has a wider range of applicability. We also prove the corresponding probabilistic guarantees. In addition, we consider a more specific problem, data set perturbation, and give relevant theoretical results by combining optimization theory.
Read more7/17/2024
🧠
0
Provably Robust and Plausible Counterfactual Explanations for Neural Networks via Robust Optimisation
Junqi Jiang, Jianglin Lan, Francesco Leofante, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni
Counterfactual Explanations (CEs) have received increasing interest as a major methodology for explaining neural network classifiers. Usually, CEs for an input-output pair are defined as data points with minimum distance to the input that are classified with a different label than the output. To tackle the established problem that CEs are easily invalidated when model parameters are updated (e.g. retrained), studies have proposed ways to certify the robustness of CEs under model parameter changes bounded by a norm ball. However, existing methods targeting this form of robustness are not sound or complete, and they may generate implausible CEs, i.e., outliers wrt the training dataset. In fact, no existing method simultaneously optimises for closeness and plausibility while preserving robustness guarantees. In this work, we propose Provably RObust and PLAusible Counterfactual Explanations (PROPLACE), a method leveraging on robust optimisation techniques to address the aforementioned limitations in the literature. We formulate an iterative algorithm to compute provably robust CEs and prove its convergence, soundness and completeness. Through a comparative experiment involving six baselines, five of which target robustness, we show that PROPLACE achieves state-of-the-art performances against metrics on three evaluation aspects.
Read more4/5/2024
📊
0
Interval Abstractions for Robust Counterfactual Explanations
Junqi Jiang, Francesco Leofante, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni
Counterfactual Explanations (CEs) have emerged as a major paradigm in explainable AI research, providing recourse recommendations for users affected by the decisions of machine learning models. However, when slight changes occur in the parameters of the underlying model, CEs found by existing methods often become invalid for the updated models. The literature lacks a way to certify deterministic robustness guarantees for CEs under model changes, in that existing methods to improve CEs' robustness are heuristic, and the robustness performances are evaluated empirically using only a limited number of retrained models. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel interval abstraction technique for parametric machine learning models, which allows us to obtain provable robustness guarantees of CEs under the possibly infinite set of plausible model changes $Delta$. We formalise our robustness notion as the $Delta$-robustness for CEs, in both binary and multi-class classification settings. We formulate procedures to verify $Delta$-robustness based on Mixed Integer Linear Programming, using which we further propose two algorithms to generate CEs that are $Delta$-robust. In an extensive empirical study, we demonstrate how our approach can be used in practice by discussing two strategies for determining the appropriate hyperparameter in our method, and we quantitatively benchmark the CEs generated by eleven methods, highlighting the effectiveness of our algorithms in finding robust CEs.
Read more4/23/2024