Generally-Occurring Model Change for Robust Counterfactual Explanations
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a generally-occurring model change (GOMC) approach to generate robust counterfactual explanations (CEs) for machine learning models.
- CEs are used to explain AI model predictions by showing how the output would change if certain input features were different.
- The GOMC method aims to produce CEs that are more stable and reliable across different model changes, making them more robust.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this paper are looking at a type of explanation for AI models called counterfactual explanations (CEs). CEs show how the output of an AI model would change if you slightly modified the input data. For example, a CE for a loan approval model might say "If your income was $5,000 higher, you would have been approved."
The key challenge with CEs is that they can be sensitive to small changes in the AI model itself. This means the CE you get one day might be very different from the CE you get the next day, even if the underlying data is the same. The researchers propose a new method called "generally-occurring model change" (GOMC) to make CEs more robust and reliable across different versions of the AI model.
The GOMC approach works by finding the common ways the model changes over time, and then using that information to generate CEs that are more stable and consistent. This makes the explanations more trustworthy and useful for understanding how the AI model is making its decisions.
Overall, this research aims to improve the reliability and usefulness of counterfactual explanations, which are an important tool for making AI systems more transparent and accountable.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel approach called "Generally-Occurring Model Change" (GOMC) to generate robust counterfactual explanations (CEs) for machine learning models. CEs are a type of explainable AI that show how changing certain input features would affect the model's output.
The key challenge addressed by this work is the instability of CEs - small changes to the underlying model can lead to very different CEs, even for the same input. The GOMC method aims to produce CEs that are more robust to these model changes.
The approach works by:
- Monitoring the model over time and identifying the common ways it changes (the "generally-occurring" changes).
- Using this information about model dynamics to generate CEs that are more stable across different model versions.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of GOMC through experiments on various datasets and model architectures, showing that it outperforms other CE generation methods in terms of stability and robustness.
Critical Analysis
The GOMC approach presented in this paper is a promising step towards more reliable and trustworthy counterfactual explanations for AI systems. By accounting for the common ways models change over time, the method can generate CEs that are more consistent and useful for understanding model behavior.
However, the paper does not fully address the challenges of providing rigorous probabilistic guarantees for the robustness of the CEs. While the empirical results are encouraging, a more formal analysis of the statistical properties of the GOMC-generated CEs would strengthen the claims.
Additionally, the paper focuses on a single-step CE generation process. In many real-world applications, it may be more useful to provide multi-step counterfactual explanations that show how a series of feature changes would affect the model output. Extending the GOMC approach to this more complex scenario could further improve its practical utility.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel method called Generally-Occurring Model Change (GOMC) that generates more robust and reliable counterfactual explanations for machine learning models. By accounting for common ways models change over time, GOMC can produce CEs that are more stable and consistent across different model versions.
The technical contributions and empirical results of this work represent an important step forward in making AI systems more transparent and interpretable. As AI models become more widespread and influential, tools like GOMC-generated CEs will be crucial for building trust and accountability in these technologies.
Future research should explore ways to provide stronger theoretical guarantees for the robustness of GOMC-based CEs, as well as extending the approach to support more complex, multi-step counterfactual explanations. Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of explainable AI and its efforts to make AI systems more understandable and trustworthy.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Generally-Occurring Model Change for Robust Counterfactual Explanations
Ao Xu, Tieru Wu
With the increasing impact of algorithmic decision-making on human lives, the interpretability of models has become a critical issue in machine learning. Counterfactual explanation is an important method in the field of interpretable machine learning, which can not only help users understand why machine learning models make specific decisions, but also help users understand how to change these decisions. Naturally, it is an important task to study the robustness of counterfactual explanation generation algorithms to model changes. Previous literature has proposed the concept of Naturally-Occurring Model Change, which has given us a deeper understanding of robustness to model change. In this paper, we first further generalize the concept of Naturally-Occurring Model Change, proposing a more general concept of model parameter changes, Generally-Occurring Model Change, which has a wider range of applicability. We also prove the corresponding probabilistic guarantees. In addition, we consider a more specific problem, data set perturbation, and give relevant theoretical results by combining optimization theory.
Read more7/17/2024
0
Rigorous Probabilistic Guarantees for Robust Counterfactual Explanations
Luca Marzari, Francesco Leofante, Ferdinando Cicalese, Alessandro Farinelli
We study the problem of assessing the robustness of counterfactual explanations for deep learning models. We focus on $textit{plausible model shifts}$ altering model parameters and propose a novel framework to reason about the robustness property in this setting. To motivate our solution, we begin by showing for the first time that computing the robustness of counterfactuals with respect to plausible model shifts is NP-complete. As this (practically) rules out the existence of scalable algorithms for exactly computing robustness, we propose a novel probabilistic approach which is able to provide tight estimates of robustness with strong guarantees while preserving scalability. Remarkably, and differently from existing solutions targeting plausible model shifts, our approach does not impose requirements on the network to be analyzed, thus enabling robustness analysis on a wider range of architectures. Experiments on four binary classification datasets indicate that our method improves the state of the art in generating robust explanations, outperforming existing methods on a range of metrics.
Read more7/11/2024
0
Counterfactual Explanations with Probabilistic Guarantees on their Robustness to Model Change
Ignacy Stk{e}pka, Mateusz Lango, Jerzy Stefanowski
Counterfactual explanations (CFEs) guide users on how to adjust inputs to machine learning models to achieve desired outputs. While existing research primarily addresses static scenarios, real-world applications often involve data or model changes, potentially invalidating previously generated CFEs and rendering user-induced input changes ineffective. Current methods addressing this issue often support only specific models or change types, require extensive hyperparameter tuning, or fail to provide probabilistic guarantees on CFE robustness to model changes. This paper proposes a novel approach for generating CFEs that provides probabilistic guarantees for any model and change type, while offering interpretable and easy-to-select hyperparameters. We establish a theoretical framework for probabilistically defining robustness to model change and demonstrate how our BetaRCE method directly stems from it. BetaRCE is a post-hoc method applied alongside a chosen base CFE generation method to enhance the quality of the explanation beyond robustness. It facilitates a transition from the base explanation to a more robust one with user-adjusted probability bounds. Through experimental comparisons with baselines, we show that BetaRCE yields robust, most plausible, and closest to baseline counterfactual explanations.
Read more8/12/2024
0
Weak Robust Compatibility Between Learning Algorithms and Counterfactual Explanation Generation Algorithms
Ao Xu, Tieru Wu
Counterfactual explanation generation is a powerful method for Explainable Artificial Intelligence. It can help users understand why machine learning models make specific decisions, and how to change those decisions. Evaluating the robustness of counterfactual explanation algorithms is therefore crucial. Previous literature has widely studied the robustness based on the perturbation of input instances. However, the robustness defined from the perspective of perturbed instances is sometimes biased, because this definition ignores the impact of learning algorithms on robustness. In this paper, we propose a more reasonable definition, Weak Robust Compatibility, based on the perspective of explanation strength. In practice, we propose WRC-Test to help us generate more robust counterfactuals. Meanwhile, we designed experiments to verify the effectiveness of WRC-Test. Theoretically, we introduce the concepts of PAC learning theory and define the concept of PAC WRC-Approximability. Based on reasonable assumptions, we establish oracle inequalities about weak robustness, which gives a sufficient condition for PAC WRC-Approximability.
Read more6/3/2024