CRiskEval: A Chinese Multi-Level Risk Evaluation Benchmark Dataset for Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces CRiskEval, a Chinese multi-level risk evaluation benchmark dataset for large language models.
- The dataset covers a range of risk-related topics, including financial risk, cybersecurity, and safe language model deployment.
- The goal is to provide a comprehensive evaluation framework to assess the capabilities of large language models in understanding and managing various types of risks.
Plain English Explanation
CRiskEval is a new dataset that aims to help researchers and developers test how well large language models can understand and deal with different kinds of risks. The dataset covers a wide range of topics, from financial risks to cybersecurity threats to safety issues related to deploying language models.
The idea is to create a comprehensive evaluation tool that can assess how capable these large language models are at understanding and handling different types of risks. This is important because as these models become more advanced and widely used, it's crucial to ensure they can be deployed safely and responsibly, without causing harm. By testing the models on a diverse set of risk-related tasks, researchers can get a better sense of their strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement.
Technical Explanation
The CRiskEval dataset is structured to evaluate large language models at multiple levels of risk understanding and management. It includes tasks that assess a model's ability to identify, analyze, and mitigate various risks, as well as its capacity to generate appropriate risk-related content.
The dataset is divided into several subsets, each focusing on a specific risk domain, such as financial risk, cybersecurity, and safe language model deployment. Each subset includes a variety of task types, including multiple-choice questions, short-answer questions, and open-ended generation tasks.
The researchers used a diverse set of data sources, including news articles, financial reports, and cybersecurity forums, to create the dataset. They also employed subject matter experts to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content.
Critical Analysis
The CRiskEval dataset represents a significant step forward in the evaluation of large language models' capabilities in the risk management domain. By providing a comprehensive and standardized benchmark, the researchers have opened up new avenues for research and development in this important area.
However, the dataset is not without its limitations. The researchers acknowledge that the dataset may not capture the full breadth and complexity of real-world risk scenarios, and that further expansion and refinement may be necessary. Additionally, the dataset is focused on the Chinese language, which may limit its applicability to other linguistic and cultural contexts.
Nevertheless, the CRiskEval dataset is a valuable contribution to the field of language model evaluation, and its use in future research and development efforts could lead to significant advancements in the field of risk management and safe language model deployment.
Conclusion
The CRiskEval dataset represents a significant advancement in the evaluation of large language models' capabilities in the risk management domain. By providing a comprehensive and standardized benchmark, the researchers have created a valuable tool for researchers and developers working to ensure the safe and responsible deployment of these powerful models. While the dataset has its limitations, its use in future research and development efforts could lead to important breakthroughs in the field of risk management and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
CRiskEval: A Chinese Multi-Level Risk Evaluation Benchmark Dataset for Large Language Models
Ling Shi, Deyi Xiong
Large language models (LLMs) are possessed of numerous beneficial capabilities, yet their potential inclination harbors unpredictable risks that may materialize in the future. We hence propose CRiskEval, a Chinese dataset meticulously designed for gauging the risk proclivities inherent in LLMs such as resource acquisition and malicious coordination, as part of efforts for proactive preparedness. To curate CRiskEval, we define a new risk taxonomy with 7 types of frontier risks and 4 safety levels, including extremely hazardous,moderately hazardous, neutral and safe. We follow the philosophy of tendency evaluation to empirically measure the stated desire of LLMs via fine-grained multiple-choice question answering. The dataset consists of 14,888 questions that simulate scenarios related to predefined 7 types of frontier risks. Each question is accompanied with 4 answer choices that state opinions or behavioral tendencies corresponding to the question. All answer choices are manually annotated with one of the defined risk levels so that we can easily build a fine-grained frontier risk profile for each assessed LLM. Extensive evaluation with CRiskEval on a spectrum of prevalent Chinese LLMs has unveiled a striking revelation: most models exhibit risk tendencies of more than 40% (weighted tendency to the four risk levels). Furthermore, a subtle increase in the model's inclination toward urgent self-sustainability, power seeking and other dangerous goals becomes evident as the size of models increase. To promote further research on the frontier risk evaluation of LLMs, we publicly release our dataset at https://github.com/lingshi6565/Risk_eval.
Read more6/10/2024
💬
0
A Chinese Dataset for Evaluating the Safeguards in Large Language Models
Yuxia Wang, Zenan Zhai, Haonan Li, Xudong Han, Lizhi Lin, Zhenxuan Zhang, Jingru Zhao, Preslav Nakov, Timothy Baldwin
Many studies have demonstrated that large language models (LLMs) can produce harmful responses, exposing users to unexpected risks when LLMs are deployed. Previous studies have proposed comprehensive taxonomies of the risks posed by LLMs, as well as corresponding prompts that can be used to examine the safety mechanisms of LLMs. However, the focus has been almost exclusively on English, and little has been explored for other languages. Here we aim to bridge this gap. We first introduce a dataset for the safety evaluation of Chinese LLMs, and then extend it to two other scenarios that can be used to better identify false negative and false positive examples in terms of risky prompt rejections. We further present a set of fine-grained safety assessment criteria for each risk type, facilitating both manual annotation and automatic evaluation in terms of LLM response harmfulness. Our experiments on five LLMs show that region-specific risks are the prevalent type of risk, presenting the major issue with all Chinese LLMs we experimented with. Our data is available at https://github.com/Libr-AI/do-not-answer. Warning: this paper contains example data that may be offensive, harmful, or biased.
Read more5/28/2024
0
CHiSafetyBench: A Chinese Hierarchical Safety Benchmark for Large Language Models
Wenjing Zhang, Xuejiao Lei, Zhaoxiang Liu, Meijuan An, Bikun Yang, KaiKai Zhao, Kai Wang, Shiguo Lian
With the profound development of large language models(LLMs), their safety concerns have garnered increasing attention. However, there is a scarcity of Chinese safety benchmarks for LLMs, and the existing safety taxonomies are inadequate, lacking comprehensive safety detection capabilities in authentic Chinese scenarios. In this work, we introduce CHiSafetyBench, a dedicated safety benchmark for evaluating LLMs' capabilities in identifying risky content and refusing answering risky questions in Chinese contexts. CHiSafetyBench incorporates a dataset that covers a hierarchical Chinese safety taxonomy consisting of 5 risk areas and 31 categories. This dataset comprises two types of tasks: multiple-choice questions and question-answering, evaluating LLMs from the perspectives of risk content identification and the ability to refuse answering risky questions respectively. Utilizing this benchmark, we validate the feasibility of automatic evaluation as a substitute for human evaluation and conduct comprehensive automatic safety assessments on mainstream Chinese LLMs. Our experiments reveal the varying performance of different models across various safety domains, indicating that all models possess considerable potential for improvement in Chinese safety capabilities. Our dataset is publicly available at https://github.com/UnicomAI/UnicomBenchmark/tree/main/CHiSafetyBench.
Read more9/4/2024
0
CJEval: A Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models Using Chinese Junior High School Exam Data
Qian-Wen Zhang, Haochen Wang, Fang Li, Siyu An, Lingfeng Qiao, Liangcai Gao, Di Yin, Xing Sun
Online education platforms have significantly transformed the dissemination of educational resources by providing a dynamic and digital infrastructure. With the further enhancement of this transformation, the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has elevated the intelligence levels of these platforms. However, current academic benchmarks provide limited guidance for real-world industry scenarios. This limitation arises because educational applications require more than mere test question responses. To bridge this gap, we introduce CJEval, a benchmark based on Chinese Junior High School Exam Evaluations. CJEval consists of 26,136 samples across four application-level educational tasks covering ten subjects. These samples include not only questions and answers but also detailed annotations such as question types, difficulty levels, knowledge concepts, and answer explanations. By utilizing this benchmark, we assessed LLMs' potential applications and conducted a comprehensive analysis of their performance by fine-tuning on various educational tasks. Extensive experiments and discussions have highlighted the opportunities and challenges of applying LLMs in the field of education.
Read more9/26/2024