Benchmarking Large Language Models on CFLUE -- A Chinese Financial Language Understanding Evaluation Dataset
2405.10542
0
0
Abstract
In light of recent breakthroughs in large language models (LLMs) that have revolutionized natural language processing (NLP), there is an urgent need for new benchmarks to keep pace with the fast development of LLMs. In this paper, we propose CFLUE, the Chinese Financial Language Understanding Evaluation benchmark, designed to assess the capability of LLMs across various dimensions. Specifically, CFLUE provides datasets tailored for both knowledge assessment and application assessment. In knowledge assessment, it consists of 38K+ multiple-choice questions with associated solution explanations. These questions serve dual purposes: answer prediction and question reasoning. In application assessment, CFLUE features 16K+ test instances across distinct groups of NLP tasks such as text classification, machine translation, relation extraction, reading comprehension, and text generation. Upon CFLUE, we conduct a thorough evaluation of representative LLMs. The results reveal that only GPT-4 and GPT-4-turbo achieve an accuracy exceeding 60% in answer prediction for knowledge assessment, suggesting that there is still substantial room for improvement in current LLMs. In application assessment, although GPT-4 and GPT-4-turbo are the top two performers, their considerable advantage over lightweight LLMs is noticeably diminished. The datasets and scripts associated with CFLUE are openly accessible at https://github.com/aliyun/cflue.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the performance of large language models (LLMs) on the Chinese Financial Language Understanding Evaluation (CFLUE) dataset, a benchmark for evaluating Chinese financial language understanding capabilities.
- The authors benchmark several state-of-the-art LLMs, including ERNIE, RoBERTa-wwm, and CPT, on various CFLUE tasks to assess their understanding of Chinese financial language.
- The results provide insights into the strengths and limitations of these LLMs in the domain of Chinese financial language understanding, which can inform the development of more capable models for real-world applications.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how well large language models, which are AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data, can understand and process Chinese financial language. The researchers used a specialized dataset called CFLUE that tests different aspects of financial language understanding in Chinese.
They evaluated several state-of-the-art language models, like ERNIE, RoBERTa-wwm, and CPT, on the CFLUE benchmark. This allowed them to see how well these models can handle things like identifying key financial concepts, answering questions about financial reports, and understanding the nuances of financial language in Chinese.
The results give us a better idea of the strengths and weaknesses of current language models when it comes to working with Chinese financial data. This information can help guide the development of more capable models that can be useful in real-world financial applications, like automating the analysis of financial documents or providing personalized investment advice.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a benchmarking study of several state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) on the Chinese Financial Language Understanding Evaluation (CFLUE) dataset. CFLUE is a comprehensive evaluation suite that assesses the ability of models to understand various aspects of Chinese financial language, including financial concepts, financial report comprehension, and financial sentiment analysis.
The authors evaluate the performance of models like ERNIE, RoBERTa-wwm, and CPT on the CFLUE tasks. They analyze the models' performance across different dimensions, such as financial concept identification, financial report question answering, and financial sentiment classification.
The results show that while the LLMs exhibit strong performance on certain CFLUE tasks, they also have notable weaknesses in understanding the nuances and complexities of Chinese financial language. The authors discuss how the benchmarking insights can inform the development of more capable LLMs for real-world financial applications, such as automated financial analysis and personalized financial advice.
Critical Analysis
The researchers provide a comprehensive and well-designed benchmarking study of LLMs on the CFLUE dataset. By evaluating a diverse set of state-of-the-art models, the paper offers valuable insights into the current capabilities and limitations of these systems in the domain of Chinese financial language understanding.
One potential limitation of the study is the scope of the CFLUE dataset itself. While CFLUE is a robust and well-curated benchmark, it may not capture the full breadth of challenges encountered in real-world financial applications, which often involve complex and context-dependent language usage. Further research exploring the performance of LLMs on a wider range of financial tasks and data sources could provide a more comprehensive assessment of their capabilities.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying reasons for the observed performance differences between the LLMs. A more detailed analysis of the models' architectural features, training data, and fine-tuning approaches could shed light on the specific strengths and weaknesses that contribute to their CFLUE task performance.
Overall, the benchmarking results presented in this paper serve as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working on developing more capable LLMs for financial applications involving Chinese language understanding. The insights can inform future model design and training strategies to address the identified limitations and further advance the field.
Conclusion
This paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of the performance of several state-of-the-art large language models on the Chinese Financial Language Understanding Evaluation (CFLUE) dataset. The results offer a detailed assessment of the models' abilities to understand various aspects of Chinese financial language, including financial concept identification, financial report comprehension, and financial sentiment analysis.
The findings highlight both the strengths and limitations of current LLMs in the domain of Chinese financial language understanding. This information can inform the development of more capable models that can be effectively deployed in real-world financial applications, such as automating financial analysis, providing personalized investment advice, and enhancing the overall user experience in financial services.
The benchmarking insights presented in this paper contribute to the ongoing efforts to advance the state-of-the-art in natural language processing, particularly in the context of specialized domains like finance. As the field continues to evolve, further research and development in this area can lead to significant improvements in the ability of AI systems to understand and make sense of complex financial language, ultimately benefiting both businesses and individual consumers.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
CFBenchmark: Chinese Financial Assistant Benchmark for Large Language Model
Yang Lei, Jiangtong Li, Dawei Cheng, Zhijun Ding, Changjun Jiang
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated great potential in the financial domain. Thus, it becomes important to assess the performance of LLMs in the financial tasks. In this work, we introduce CFBenchmark, to evaluate the performance of LLMs for Chinese financial assistant. The basic version of CFBenchmark is designed to evaluate the basic ability in Chinese financial text processing from three aspects~(emph{i.e.} recognition, classification, and generation) including eight tasks, and includes financial texts ranging in length from 50 to over 1,800 characters. We conduct experiments on several LLMs available in the literature with CFBenchmark-Basic, and the experimental results indicate that while some LLMs show outstanding performance in specific tasks, overall, there is still significant room for improvement in basic tasks of financial text processing with existing models. In the future, we plan to explore the advanced version of CFBenchmark, aiming to further explore the extensive capabilities of language models in more profound dimensions as a financial assistant in Chinese. Our codes are released at https://github.com/TongjiFinLab/CFBenchmark.
5/22/2024
C$^{3}$Bench: A Comprehensive Classical Chinese Understanding Benchmark for Large Language Models
Jiahuan Cao, Yongxin Shi, Dezhi Peng, Yang Liu, Lianwen Jin
0
0
Classical Chinese Understanding (CCU) holds significant value in preserving and exploration of the outstanding traditional Chinese culture. Recently, researchers have attempted to leverage the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) for CCU by capitalizing on their remarkable comprehension and semantic capabilities. However, no comprehensive benchmark is available to assess the CCU capabilities of LLMs. To fill this gap, this paper introduces C$^{3}$bench, a Comprehensive Classical Chinese understanding benchmark, which comprises 50,000 text pairs for five primary CCU tasks, including classification, retrieval, named entity recognition, punctuation, and translation. Furthermore, the data in C$^{3}$bench originates from ten different domains, covering most of the categories in classical Chinese. Leveraging the proposed C$^{3}$bench, we extensively evaluate the quantitative performance of 15 representative LLMs on all five CCU tasks. Our results not only establish a public leaderboard of LLMs' CCU capabilities but also gain some findings. Specifically, existing LLMs are struggle with CCU tasks and still inferior to supervised models. Additionally, the results indicate that CCU is a task that requires special attention. We believe this study could provide a standard benchmark, comprehensive baselines, and valuable insights for the future advancement of LLM-based CCU research. The evaluation pipeline and dataset are available at url{https://github.com/SCUT-DLVCLab/C3bench}.
5/31/2024
Measuring Taiwanese Mandarin Language Understanding
Po-Heng Chen, Sijia Cheng, Wei-Lin Chen, Yen-Ting Lin, Yun-Nung Chen
0
0
The evaluation of large language models (LLMs) has drawn substantial attention in the field recently. This work focuses on evaluating LLMs in a Chinese context, specifically, for Traditional Chinese which has been largely underrepresented in existing benchmarks. We present TMLU, a holistic evaluation suit tailored for assessing the advanced knowledge and reasoning capability in LLMs, under the context of Taiwanese Mandarin. TMLU consists of an array of 37 subjects across social science, STEM, humanities, Taiwan-specific content, and others, ranging from middle school to professional levels. In addition, we curate chain-of-thought-like few-shot explanations for each subject to facilitate the evaluation of complex reasoning skills. To establish a comprehensive baseline, we conduct extensive experiments and analysis on 24 advanced LLMs. The results suggest that Chinese open-weight models demonstrate inferior performance comparing to multilingual proprietary ones, and open-weight models tailored for Taiwanese Mandarin lag behind the Simplified-Chinese counterparts. The findings indicate great headrooms for improvement, and emphasize the goal of TMLU to foster the development of localized Taiwanese-Mandarin LLMs. We release the benchmark and evaluation scripts for the community to promote future research.
4/1/2024
FoundaBench: Evaluating Chinese Fundamental Knowledge Capabilities of Large Language Models
Wei Li, Ren Ma, Jiang Wu, Chenya Gu, Jiahui Peng, Jinyang Len, Songyang Zhang, Hang Yan, Dahua Lin, Conghui He
0
0
In the burgeoning field of large language models (LLMs), the assessment of fundamental knowledge remains a critical challenge, particularly for models tailored to Chinese language and culture. This paper introduces FoundaBench, a pioneering benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate the fundamental knowledge capabilities of Chinese LLMs. FoundaBench encompasses a diverse array of 3354 multiple-choice questions across common sense and K-12 educational subjects, meticulously curated to reflect the breadth and depth of everyday and academic knowledge. We present an extensive evaluation of 12 state-of-the-art LLMs using FoundaBench, employing both traditional assessment methods and our CircularEval protocol to mitigate potential biases in model responses. Our results highlight the superior performance of models pre-trained on Chinese corpora, and reveal a significant disparity between models' reasoning and memory recall capabilities. The insights gleaned from FoundaBench evaluations set a new standard for understanding the fundamental knowledge of LLMs, providing a robust framework for future advancements in the field.
4/30/2024