A Critical Assessment of Interpretable and Explainable Machine Learning for Intrusion Detection
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a critical assessment of interpretable and explainable machine learning (ML) techniques for intrusion detection systems.
- The authors analyze the advantages and limitations of various interpretable ML models and their ability to provide meaningful explanations for intrusion detection.
- The research aims to guide the development of more robust and trustworthy intrusion detection systems using interpretable and explainable ML.
Plain English Explanation
Intrusion detection systems are designed to identify unauthorized or malicious activities in computer networks. Interpretable and explainable machine learning can help make these systems more transparent and trustworthy by providing insights into how they make decisions.
This paper takes a close look at different interpretable ML models and evaluates how well they can explain their intrusion detection process. The authors analyze the strengths and weaknesses of these models, such as their ability to identify the specific features or patterns that led to a detection.
By understanding the inner workings of these ML-based intrusion detection systems, researchers and developers can improve their reliability and ensure they are making accurate and justified decisions. This is important for both technical and ethical reasons, as these systems are often used to protect sensitive information and infrastructure.
The paper aims to guide the development of future intrusion detection systems that balance performance with interpretability and explainability, making them more transparent and trustworthy for end-users.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing background on intrusion detection systems and the growing importance of interpretable and explainable machine learning. The authors then review various interpretable ML models, such as decision trees, rule-based systems, and attention-based neural networks, and analyze their suitability for intrusion detection tasks.
The paper evaluates these models based on factors like their ability to:
- Identify the most important features contributing to a detection
- Provide clear and understandable explanations for their decisions
- Maintain high detection accuracy compared to black-box ML models
The authors also discuss the trade-offs between interpretability, explainability, and model performance, highlighting the challenges in developing intrusion detection systems that excel in all these areas.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the authors note that the effectiveness of interpretable ML models can be dataset-dependent, and their explanations may not always be complete or fully accurate.
Additionally, the paper suggests that more work is needed to standardize the evaluation of interpretability and explainability in the context of intrusion detection, as current metrics and benchmarks may not fully capture the nuances of this domain.
The authors also raise concerns about the potential privacy implications of using explainable AI systems for intrusion detection, as the detailed explanations could reveal sensitive information about network traffic and user behavior.
Overall, the paper provides a thoughtful and balanced critique of the current state of interpretable and explainable ML for intrusion detection, highlighting both the promise and the challenges of this approach.
Conclusion
This paper offers a comprehensive analysis of the use of interpretable and explainable machine learning techniques in intrusion detection systems. The authors demonstrate that while these approaches can enhance the transparency and trustworthiness of such systems, there are still significant hurdles to overcome in developing robust and reliable intrusion detection solutions.
The insights provided in this research can inform the design of future intrusion detection systems that prioritize interpretability and explainability, ultimately leading to more trustworthy and accountable cybersecurity tools. As the use of AI and ML continues to expand in critical domains, this type of critical assessment is crucial for ensuring these technologies are developed and deployed responsibly.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Critical Assessment of Interpretable and Explainable Machine Learning for Intrusion Detection
Omer Subasi, Johnathan Cree, Joseph Manzano, Elena Peterson
There has been a large number of studies in interpretable and explainable ML for cybersecurity, in particular, for intrusion detection. Many of these studies have significant amount of overlapping and repeated evaluations and analysis. At the same time, these studies overlook crucial model, data, learning process, and utility related issues and many times completely disregard them. These issues include the use of overly complex and opaque ML models, unaccounted data imbalances and correlated features, inconsistent influential features across different explanation methods, the inconsistencies stemming from the constituents of a learning process, and the implausible utility of explanations. In this work, we empirically demonstrate these issues, analyze them and propose practical solutions in the context of feature-based model explanations. Specifically, we advise avoiding complex opaque models such as Deep Neural Networks and instead using interpretable ML models such as Decision Trees as the available intrusion datasets are not difficult for such interpretable models to classify successfully. Then, we bring attention to the binary classification metrics such as Matthews Correlation Coefficient (which are well-suited for imbalanced datasets. Moreover, we find that feature-based model explanations are most often inconsistent across different settings. In this respect, to further gauge the extent of inconsistencies, we introduce the notion of cross explanations which corroborates that the features that are determined to be impactful by one explanation method most often differ from those by another method. Furthermore, we show that strongly correlated data features and the constituents of a learning process, such as hyper-parameters and the optimization routine, become yet another source of inconsistent explanations. Finally, we discuss the utility of feature-based explanations.
Read more7/8/2024
0
Explainable AI for Comparative Analysis of Intrusion Detection Models
Pap M. Corea, Yongxin Liu, Jian Wang, Shuteng Niu, Houbing Song
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has become a widely discussed topic, the related technologies facilitate better understanding of conventional black-box models like Random Forest, Neural Networks and etc. However, domain-specific applications of XAI are still insufficient. To fill this gap, this research analyzes various machine learning models to the tasks of binary and multi-class classification for intrusion detection from network traffic on the same dataset using occlusion sensitivity. The models evaluated include Linear Regression, Logistic Regression, Linear Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest, Decision Trees, and Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLP). We trained all models to the accuracy of 90% on the UNSW-NB15 Dataset. We found that most classifiers leverage only less than three critical features to achieve such accuracies, indicating that effective feature engineering could actually be far more important for intrusion detection than applying complicated models. We also discover that Random Forest provides the best performance in terms of accuracy, time efficiency and robustness. Data and code available at https://github.com/pcwhy/XML-IntrusionDetection.git
Read more7/4/2024
0
Hard to Explain: On the Computational Hardness of In-Distribution Model Interpretation
Guy Amir, Shahaf Bassan, Guy Katz
The ability to interpret Machine Learning (ML) models is becoming increasingly essential. However, despite significant progress in the field, there remains a lack of rigorous characterization regarding the innate interpretability of different models. In an attempt to bridge this gap, recent work has demonstrated that it is possible to formally assess interpretability by studying the computational complexity of explaining the decisions of various models. In this setting, if explanations for a particular model can be obtained efficiently, the model is considered interpretable (since it can be explained ``easily''). However, if generating explanations over an ML model is computationally intractable, it is considered uninterpretable. Prior research identified two key factors that influence the complexity of interpreting an ML model: (i) the type of the model (e.g., neural networks, decision trees, etc.); and (ii) the form of explanation (e.g., contrastive explanations, Shapley values, etc.). In this work, we claim that a third, important factor must also be considered for this analysis -- the underlying distribution over which the explanation is obtained. Considering the underlying distribution is key in avoiding explanations that are socially misaligned, i.e., convey information that is biased and unhelpful to users. We demonstrate the significant influence of the underlying distribution on the resulting overall interpretation complexity, in two settings: (i) prediction models paired with an external out-of-distribution (OOD) detector; and (ii) prediction models designed to inherently generate socially aligned explanations. Our findings prove that the expressiveness of the distribution can significantly influence the overall complexity of interpretation, and identify essential prerequisites that a model must possess to generate socially aligned explanations.
Read more8/9/2024
0
X-CBA: Explainability Aided CatBoosted Anomal-E for Intrusion Detection System
Kiymet Kaya, Elif Ak, Sumeyye Bas, Berk Canberk, Sule Gunduz Oguducu
The effectiveness of Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) is critical in an era where cyber threats are becoming increasingly complex. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models provide an efficient and accurate solution for identifying attacks and anomalies in computer networks. However, using ML and DL models in IDS has led to a trust deficit due to their non-transparent decision-making. This transparency gap in IDS research is significant, affecting confidence and accountability. To address, this paper introduces a novel Explainable IDS approach, called X-CBA, that leverages the structural advantages of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to effectively process network traffic data, while also adapting a new Explainable AI (XAI) methodology. Unlike most GNN-based IDS that depend on labeled network traffic and node features, thereby overlooking critical packet-level information, our approach leverages a broader range of traffic data through network flows, including edge attributes, to improve detection capabilities and adapt to novel threats. Through empirical testing, we establish that our approach not only achieves high accuracy with 99.47% in threat detection but also advances the field by providing clear, actionable explanations of its analytical outcomes. This research also aims to bridge the current gap and facilitate the broader integration of ML/DL technologies in cybersecurity defenses by offering a local and global explainability solution that is both precise and interpretable.
Read more6/4/2024