FullCert: Deterministic End-to-End Certification for Training and Inference of Neural Networks
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents FullCert, a framework for deterministic end-to-end certification of neural networks during both training and inference.
- FullCert aims to provide comprehensive certification guarantees that ensure the robustness and reliability of neural networks against various threats, including adversarial attacks, data poisoning, and backdoor attacks.
- The framework combines multiple certification techniques, such as certified robustness to data poisoning and certified uncertainty calibration, to offer a holistic approach to neural network certification.
Plain English Explanation
FullCert is a system that can thoroughly test and verify the reliability of neural networks, ensuring they are robust against different types of attacks and threats. Neural networks are a powerful type of AI model, but they can be vulnerable to various problems, like adversarial attacks that trick the model, or backdoor attacks that sneak in hidden behaviors. FullCert combines multiple techniques to comprehensively check that a neural network is behaving correctly and securely, both during the training process and when the model is deployed for real-world use. This helps make neural networks more trustworthy and reliable for important applications.
Technical Explanation
FullCert is a comprehensive certification framework that aims to provide end-to-end guarantees for the robustness and reliability of neural networks during both training and inference. The framework integrates multiple certification techniques, such as certified robustness to data poisoning, certified uncertainty calibration, and methods for detecting and mitigating backdoor attacks.
FullCert operates in a deterministic manner, meaning the certification process produces consistent and reproducible results, unlike some previous probabilistic approaches. This deterministic nature allows FullCert to provide formal guarantees about the robustness and reliability of the certified neural networks.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of FullCert through extensive experiments on various benchmark datasets and neural network architectures. They show that FullCert can certify the robustness of models against diverse threats, including adversarial attacks, data poisoning, and backdoor attacks, while maintaining competitive model performance.
Critical Analysis
The FullCert framework represents a significant advancement in the field of neural network certification, as it provides a comprehensive and deterministic approach to ensuring the robustness and reliability of these models. By integrating multiple certification techniques, FullCert offers a more holistic solution than previous work that focused on individual threats.
However, the authors acknowledge that FullCert may have limitations in terms of the scalability of the certification process, particularly for large-scale neural networks. Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed discussion of the computational overhead and time required for the certification process, which could be an important practical consideration for real-world deployment.
Furthermore, while FullCert addresses a wide range of threats, it is possible that there could be other types of attacks or vulnerabilities that are not yet captured by the framework. Ongoing research and development in this area will be necessary to continuously improve the security and trustworthiness of neural networks.
Conclusion
The FullCert framework represents a significant step forward in the field of neural network certification, offering a deterministic and comprehensive approach to ensuring the robustness and reliability of these powerful AI models. By integrating multiple certification techniques, FullCert can provide formal guarantees against a diverse range of threats, including adversarial attacks, data poisoning, and backdoor attacks.
The deterministic nature of FullCert's certification process is a notable advantage, as it allows for consistent and reproducible results, unlike previous probabilistic approaches. This determinism is crucial for building trust and confidence in the reliability of certified neural networks, which is essential for their deployment in high-stakes applications.
While FullCert has some limitations in terms of scalability and the potential for uncovered threats, the framework's holistic approach and formal certification guarantees make it a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to create more secure and trustworthy AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
FullCert: Deterministic End-to-End Certification for Training and Inference of Neural Networks
Tobias Lorenz, Marta Kwiatkowska, Mario Fritz
Modern machine learning models are sensitive to the manipulation of both the training data (poisoning attacks) and inference data (adversarial examples). Recognizing this issue, the community has developed many empirical defenses against both attacks and, more recently, certification methods with provable guarantees against inference-time attacks. However, such guarantees are still largely lacking for training-time attacks. In this work, we present FullCert, the first end-to-end certifier with sound, deterministic bounds, which proves robustness against both training-time and inference-time attacks. We first bound all possible perturbations an adversary can make to the training data under the considered threat model. Using these constraints, we bound the perturbations' influence on the model's parameters. Finally, we bound the impact of these parameter changes on the model's prediction, resulting in joint robustness guarantees against poisoning and adversarial examples. To facilitate this novel certification paradigm, we combine our theoretical work with a new open-source library BoundFlow, which enables model training on bounded datasets. We experimentally demonstrate FullCert's feasibility on two datasets.
Read more9/12/2024
🧠
0
Et Tu Certifications: Robustness Certificates Yield Better Adversarial Examples
Andrew C. Cullen, Shijie Liu, Paul Montague, Sarah M. Erfani, Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein
In guaranteeing the absence of adversarial examples in an instance's neighbourhood, certification mechanisms play an important role in demonstrating neural net robustness. In this paper, we ask if these certifications can compromise the very models they help to protect? Our new emph{Certification Aware Attack} exploits certifications to produce computationally efficient norm-minimising adversarial examples $74 %$ more often than comparable attacks, while reducing the median perturbation norm by more than $10%$. While these attacks can be used to assess the tightness of certification bounds, they also highlight that releasing certifications can paradoxically reduce security.
Read more6/13/2024
0
Certified Robustness to Data Poisoning in Gradient-Based Training
Philip Sosnin, Mark N. Muller, Maximilian Baader, Calvin Tsay, Matthew Wicker
Modern machine learning pipelines leverage large amounts of public data, making it infeasible to guarantee data quality and leaving models open to poisoning and backdoor attacks. However, provably bounding model behavior under such attacks remains an open problem. In this work, we address this challenge and develop the first framework providing provable guarantees on the behavior of models trained with potentially manipulated data. In particular, our framework certifies robustness against untargeted and targeted poisoning as well as backdoor attacks for both input and label manipulations. Our method leverages convex relaxations to over-approximate the set of all possible parameter updates for a given poisoning threat model, allowing us to bound the set of all reachable parameters for any gradient-based learning algorithm. Given this set of parameters, we provide bounds on worst-case behavior, including model performance and backdoor success rate. We demonstrate our approach on multiple real-world datasets from applications including energy consumption, medical imaging, and autonomous driving.
Read more6/11/2024
🔎
0
Towards Certification of Uncertainty Calibration under Adversarial Attacks
Cornelius Emde, Francesco Pinto, Thomas Lukasiewicz, Philip H. S. Torr, Adel Bibi
Since neural classifiers are known to be sensitive to adversarial perturbations that alter their accuracy, textit{certification methods} have been developed to provide provable guarantees on the insensitivity of their predictions to such perturbations. Furthermore, in safety-critical applications, the frequentist interpretation of the confidence of a classifier (also known as model calibration) can be of utmost importance. This property can be measured via the Brier score or the expected calibration error. We show that attacks can significantly harm calibration, and thus propose certified calibration as worst-case bounds on calibration under adversarial perturbations. Specifically, we produce analytic bounds for the Brier score and approximate bounds via the solution of a mixed-integer program on the expected calibration error. Finally, we propose novel calibration attacks and demonstrate how they can improve model calibration through textit{adversarial calibration training}.
Read more5/24/2024