DART: A Solution for Decentralized Federated Learning Model Robustness Analysis

Read original: arXiv:2407.08652 - Published 7/12/2024 by Chao Feng, Alberto Huertas Celdr'an, Jan von der Assen, Enrique Tom'as Mart'inez Beltr'an, G'er^ome Bovet, Burkhard Stiller
Total Score

0

DART: A Solution for Decentralized Federated Learning Model Robustness Analysis

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Presents DART, a solution for analyzing the robustness of decentralized federated learning models
  • Addresses challenges in ensuring model robustness in decentralized settings, where participants may be unreliable or malicious
  • Introduces a novel framework for evaluating model robustness against various attacks, including Byzantine-robust decentralized federated learning, poisoning attacks, and more

Plain English Explanation

Decentralized federated learning is a way for multiple organizations or devices to work together on training a machine learning model without sharing all their private data. However, this setup can make the model vulnerable to attacks, where some participants try to sabotage the training process.

The DART framework provides a way to analyze how robust the trained model is against different types of attacks, such as when some participants try to inject bad data or prevent the model from converging properly. By understanding the model's weaknesses, researchers and developers can then design better defenses to protect the model's reliability and performance, even in decentralized settings where not all participants can be fully trusted.

Technical Explanation

The DART framework consists of several key components:

  1. Attack Simulator: Allows researchers to simulate different attack scenarios, such as extreme model poisoning or Byzantine-robust attacks, in a decentralized federated learning environment.

  2. Robustness Evaluation: Provides metrics and methods to quantify the model's resilience against the simulated attacks, measuring factors like accuracy, convergence speed, and stability.

  3. Countermeasure Design: Enables the exploration and testing of defense strategies, such as secure aggregation or adaptive participant selection, to improve the model's robustness.

The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of DART through experiments on real-world federated learning tasks, showing how it can identify vulnerabilities and guide the development of more secure decentralized learning systems.

Critical Analysis

The DART framework represents an important step forward in understanding and addressing the security challenges of decentralized federated learning. By providing a structured approach to evaluating model robustness, it can help researchers and developers identify and mitigate potential threats before deploying these systems in real-world applications.

However, the paper also acknowledges some limitations of DART. For example, it does not yet address more complex attack scenarios, such as decentralized sporadic federated learning, where participants may join and leave the network intermittently. Further research is needed to extend the framework's capabilities and ensure its applicability to a wider range of decentralized learning environments.

Conclusion

The DART framework is a valuable tool for analyzing the robustness of decentralized federated learning models. By simulating various attack scenarios and evaluating the model's resilience, it can help researchers and developers design more secure and trustworthy distributed machine learning systems. As the field of decentralized federated learning continues to evolve, frameworks like DART will be crucial for ensuring the reliability and integrity of these collaborative learning models, even in the face of potential adversaries.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

DART: A Solution for Decentralized Federated Learning Model Robustness Analysis
Total Score

0

DART: A Solution for Decentralized Federated Learning Model Robustness Analysis

Chao Feng, Alberto Huertas Celdr'an, Jan von der Assen, Enrique Tom'as Mart'inez Beltr'an, G'er^ome Bovet, Burkhard Stiller

Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising approach to address privacy concerns inherent in Machine Learning (ML) practices. However, conventional FL methods, particularly those following the Centralized FL (CFL) paradigm, utilize a central server for global aggregation, which exhibits limitations such as bottleneck and single point of failure. To address these issues, the Decentralized FL (DFL) paradigm has been proposed, which removes the client-server boundary and enables all participants to engage in model training and aggregation tasks. Nevertheless, as CFL, DFL remains vulnerable to adversarial attacks, notably poisoning attacks that undermine model performance. While existing research on model robustness has predominantly focused on CFL, there is a noteworthy gap in understanding the model robustness of the DFL paradigm. In this paper, a thorough review of poisoning attacks targeting the model robustness in DFL systems, as well as their corresponding countermeasures, are presented. Additionally, a solution called DART is proposed to evaluate the robustness of DFL models, which is implemented and integrated into a DFL platform. Through extensive experiments, this paper compares the behavior of CFL and DFL under diverse poisoning attacks, pinpointing key factors affecting attack spread and effectiveness within the DFL. It also evaluates the performance of different defense mechanisms and investigates whether defense mechanisms designed for CFL are compatible with DFL. The empirical results provide insights into research challenges and suggest ways to improve the robustness of DFL models for future research.

Read more

7/12/2024

Byzantine-Robust Decentralized Federated Learning
Total Score

0

Byzantine-Robust Decentralized Federated Learning

Minghong Fang, Zifan Zhang, Hairi, Prashant Khanduri, Jia Liu, Songtao Lu, Yuchen Liu, Neil Gong

Federated learning (FL) enables multiple clients to collaboratively train machine learning models without revealing their private training data. In conventional FL, the system follows the server-assisted architecture (server-assisted FL), where the training process is coordinated by a central server. However, the server-assisted FL framework suffers from poor scalability due to a communication bottleneck at the server, and trust dependency issues. To address challenges, decentralized federated learning (DFL) architecture has been proposed to allow clients to train models collaboratively in a serverless and peer-to-peer manner. However, due to its fully decentralized nature, DFL is highly vulnerable to poisoning attacks, where malicious clients could manipulate the system by sending carefully-crafted local models to their neighboring clients. To date, only a limited number of Byzantine-robust DFL methods have been proposed, most of which are either communication-inefficient or remain vulnerable to advanced poisoning attacks. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm called BALANCE (Byzantine-robust averaging through local similarity in decentralization) to defend against poisoning attacks in DFL. In BALANCE, each client leverages its own local model as a similarity reference to determine if the received model is malicious or benign. We establish the theoretical convergence guarantee for BALANCE under poisoning attacks in both strongly convex and non-convex settings. Furthermore, the convergence rate of BALANCE under poisoning attacks matches those of the state-of-the-art counterparts in Byzantine-free settings. Extensive experiments also demonstrate that BALANCE outperforms existing DFL methods and effectively defends against poisoning attacks.

Read more

7/16/2024

Leveraging MTD to Mitigate Poisoning Attacks in Decentralized FL with Non-IID Data
Total Score

0

Leveraging MTD to Mitigate Poisoning Attacks in Decentralized FL with Non-IID Data

Chao Feng, Alberto Huertas Celdr'an, Zien Zeng, Zi Ye, Jan von der Assen, Gerome Bovet, Burkhard Stiller

Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL), a paradigm for managing big data in a privacy-preserved manner, is still vulnerable to poisoning attacks where malicious clients tamper with data or models. Current defense methods often assume Independently and Identically Distributed (IID) data, which is unrealistic in real-world applications. In non-IID contexts, existing defensive strategies face challenges in distinguishing between models that have been compromised and those that have been trained on heterogeneous data distributions, leading to diminished efficacy. In response, this paper proposes a framework that employs the Moving Target Defense (MTD) approach to bolster the robustness of DFL models. By continuously modifying the attack surface of the DFL system, this framework aims to mitigate poisoning attacks effectively. The proposed MTD framework includes both proactive and reactive modes, utilizing a reputation system that combines metrics of model similarity and loss, alongside various defensive techniques. Comprehensive experimental evaluations indicate that the MTD-based mechanism significantly mitigates a range of poisoning attack types across multiple datasets with different topologies.

Read more

10/3/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

Decentralized Federated Learning: A Survey and Perspective

Liangqi Yuan, Ziran Wang, Lichao Sun, Philip S. Yu, Christopher G. Brinton

Federated learning (FL) has been gaining attention for its ability to share knowledge while maintaining user data, protecting privacy, increasing learning efficiency, and reducing communication overhead. Decentralized FL (DFL) is a decentralized network architecture that eliminates the need for a central server in contrast to centralized FL (CFL). DFL enables direct communication between clients, resulting in significant savings in communication resources. In this paper, a comprehensive survey and profound perspective are provided for DFL. First, a review of the methodology, challenges, and variants of CFL is conducted, laying the background of DFL. Then, a systematic and detailed perspective on DFL is introduced, including iteration order, communication protocols, network topologies, paradigm proposals, and temporal variability. Next, based on the definition of DFL, several extended variants and categorizations are proposed with state-of-the-art (SOTA) technologies. Lastly, in addition to summarizing the current challenges in the DFL, some possible solutions and future research directions are also discussed.

Read more

5/7/2024